Long-term continuous flow left ventricular assist device support and end-organ function: Prospects for destination therapy

Journal of Cardiac Surgery

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 490-494

  Slaughter, Mark S ^a  

^a University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSISTED CIRCULATION; CAPILLARY FLOW; CELL FUNCTION; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MICROCIRCULATION; ORGAN PRESERVATION; REVIEW;

HEART FAILURE; HEART TRANSPLANTATION; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HUMANS; KENTUCKY; MICROCIRCULATION; MULTIPLE ORGAN FAILURE; QUALITY OF LIFE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77954353129     PISSN: 08860440     EISSN: 15408191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2010.01075.x     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Burnett CM, Duncan JM, Frazier OH, et al : Improved multiorgan function after prolonged univentricular support. Ann Thorac Surg 1993 55 (1 65 71 discussion 71.
2. Farrar DJ, Hill JD : Recovery of major organ function in patients awaiting heart transplantation with Thoratec ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant 1994 13 (6 1125 1132.
3. Reddy RC, Goldstein AH, Pacella JJ, et al : End organ function with prolonged nonpulsatile circulatory support. ASAIO J 1995 41 (3 M547 M551.
4. Long JW, Kfoury AG, Slaughter MS, et al : Long-term destination therapy with the HeartMate XVE left ventricular assist device: Improved outcomes since the REMATCH study. Congest Heart Fail 2005 11 (3 133 138.
5. Holman WL, Kormos RL, Naftel DC, et al : Predictors of death and transplant in patients with a mechanical circulatory support device: A multi-institutional study. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009 28 (1 44 50.
6. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Stevenson LW, et al : INTERMACS database for durable devices for circulatory support: First annual report. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008 27 (10 1065 1072.
7. Weslowski S : The role of the pulse in maintenance of the systemic circulation during heart lung bypass. Trans Am Soc Artif Organs 1956 1 : 84 86.
8. Baldwin RT, Radovancevic B, Conger JL, et al : Peripheral organ perfusion augmentation during left ventricular failure. A controlled bovine comparison between the intraaortic balloon pump and the Hemopump. Tex Heart Inst J 1993 20 (4 275 280.
9. Orime Y, Shiono M, Nakata K, et al : The role of pulsatility in end-organ microcirculation after cardiogenic shock. ASAIO J 1996 42 (5 M724 M729.
10. Sezai A, Shiono M, Orime Y, et al : Major organ function under mechanical support: Comparative studies of pulsatile and nonpulsatile circulation. Artif Organs 1999 23 (3 280 285.
11. Haines N, Wang S, Undar A, et al : Clinical outcomes of pulsatile and non-pulsatile mode of perfusion. J Extra Corpor Technol 2009 41 (1 P26 P29.
12. Kamdar F, Boyle A, Liao K, et al : Effects of centrifugal, axial, and pulsatile left ventricular assist device support on end-organ function in heart failure patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009 28 (4 352 359.
13. Voss B, Krane M, Jung C, et al : Cardiopulmonary bypass with physiological flow and pressure curves: Pulse is unnecessary!. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010 37 (1 223 232.
14. Letsou GV, Myers TJ, Gregoric ID, et al : Continuous axial-flow left ventricular assist device (Jarvik 2000) maintains kidney and liver perfusion for up to 6 months. Ann Thorac Surg 2003 76 (4 1167 1170.
15. Myers TJ, Bolmers M, Gregoric ID, et al : Assessment of arterial blood pressure during support with an axial flow left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009 28 (5 423 427.
16. Frazier OH, Myers TJ, Jarvik RK, et al : Research and development of an implantable, axial-flow left ventricular assist device: The Jarvik 2000 Heart. Ann Thorac Surg 2001 71 (3 Suppl S125 S132 discussion S144-S126.
17. Ji B, Undar A : An evaluation of the benefits of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures in pediatric and adult cardiac patients. ASAIO J 2006 52 (4 357 361.
18. Thalmann M, Schima H, Wieselthaler G, et al : Physiology of continuous blood flow in recipients of rotary cardiac assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005 24 (3 237 245.
19. Deng MC, Loebe M, El-Banayosy A, et al : Mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure: Effect of patient selection on outcome. Circulation 2001 103 (2 231 237.
20. Miller LW, Lietz K : Candidate selection for long-term left ventricular assist device therapy for refractory heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2006 25 (7 756 764.
21. Aaronson KD, Patel H, Pagani FD : Patient selection for left ventricular assist device therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2003 75 (6 Suppl S29 S35.
22. Pagani FD, Miller LW, Russell SD, et al : Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 54 (4 312 321.
23. Lahpor J, Khaghani A, Hetzer R, et al : European results with a continuous-flow ventricular assist device for advanced heart-failure patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010 37 (2 357 361.
24. Struber M, Sander K, Lahpor J, et al : HeartMate II left ventricular assist device; early European experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008 34 (2 289 294.
25. Strueber M, Birks, E, Jansz P, et al : Clinical results of the international HeartWare LVAS bridge to transplant trial. JHLT 2009 28 (2 Suppl S255.
26. Morshuis M, El-Banayosy A, Arusoglu L, et al : European experience of DuraHeart magnetically levitated centrifugal left ventricular assist system. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009 35 (6 1020 1027 discussion 1027-1028.
27. Radovancevic B, Vrtovec B, de Kort E, et al : End-organ function in patients on long-term circulatory support with continuous- or pulsatile-flow assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007 26 (8 815 818.
28. Russell SD, Roger JG, Milano CA, et al : Renal and hepatic function improve in advanced heart failure patients during continuous flow support with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. Circulation 2009 120 (23 2352 2357.
29. Westaby S, Siegenthaler M, Beyersdorf F, et al : Destination therapy with a rotary blood pump and novel power delivery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010 37 (2 350 356.
30. Westaby S, Banning A, Neil D, et al : Optimism derived from 7.5 years of continuous-flow circulatory support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139 (3 e45 e47.
31. Polska E, Schima H, Wieselthaler G, et al : Choroidal microcirculation in patients with rotary cardiac assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007 26 (6 572 578.
32. den Uil CA, Maat AP, Lagrand WK, et al : Mechanical circulatory support devices improve tissue perfusion in patients with end-stage heart failure or cardiogenic shock. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009 28 (9 906 911.
33. Zimpfer D, Wieselthaler G, Czerny M, et al : Neurocognitive function in patients with ventricular assist devices: A comparison of pulsatile and continuous blood flow devices. ASAIO J 2006 52 (1 24 27.
34. Petrucci RJ, Wright S, Naka Y, et al : HeartMate IICI. Neurocognitive assessments in advanced heart failure patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009 28 (6 542 549.
35. Esmore D, Kaye D, Spratt P, et al : A prospective, multicenter trial of the VentrAssist left ventricular assist device for bridge to transplant: Safety and efficacy. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008 27 (6 579 588.
36. Holman WL, Pae WE, Teutenberg JJ, et al : INTERMACS: Interval analysis of registry data. J Am Coll Surg 2009 208 (5 755 761 discussion 761-752.
37. Slaughter MS : Destination therapy: The future is arriving. Congest Heart Fail 2005 11 : 155 156.