Polyethylene glycol antiglobulin tube versus gel microcolumn: Influence on the incidence of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions and delayed serologic transfusion reactions

Transfusion

Volumn 50, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1444-1452

  Winters, Jeffrey L ^a,b   Richa, Elie M ^a,b   Bryant, Sandra C ^a,b   Tauscher, Craig D ^a,b   Bendix, Brenda J ^a,b   Stubbs, James R ^a,b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERYTHROCYTE ANTIBODY; IMMUNOGLOBULIN ANTIBODY; MACROGOL;

ANTIBODY DETECTION; ANTIBODY SCREENING; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION REACTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DELAYED HEMOLYTIC TRANSFUSION REACTION; DELAYED SEROLOGIC TRANSFUSION REACTION; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; GEL; GEL MICROCOLUMN TECHNIQUE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MACROGOL ANTIGLOBULIN TUBE TECHNIQUE; SEROLOGY;

ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; ANTIGEN-ANTIBODY REACTIONS; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; COOMBS' TEST; FEMALE; HEMOLYSIS; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

EID: 77954336592     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02609.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Mollison PL, Engelfriet CP, Contreras M. Blood transfusion in clinical medicine. 10th ed.
2. Ness PM, Shirey RS, Thoman SK, Buck SA. The differentiation of delayed serologic and delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions: incidence, long-term serologic findings, and clinical significance. Transfusion 1990 30 : 688 93.
3. Taswell HF, Pineda AA, Moore SB. Hemolytic transfusion reactions: frequency and clinical and laboratory aspects. In : Bell CA, editor. A seminar on immune-mediated cell destruction.
4. Pineda AA, Taswell HF, Brzica SM. Delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction. An immunologic hazard of blood transfusion. Transfusion 1978 18 : 1 7.
5. Moore SB, Taswell HF, Pineda AA, Sonnenberg CL. Delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions. Evidence of the need for an improved pretransfusion compatibility test. Am J Clin Pathol 1980 74 : 94 7.
6. Vamvakas EC, Pineda AA, Reisner R, Santrach PJ, Moore SB. The differentiation of delayed hemolytic and delayed serologic transfusion reactions: incidence and predictors of hemolysis. Transfusion 1995 35 : 26 32.
7. Pineda AA, Vamvakas EC, Gorden LD, Winters JL, Moore SB. Trends in the incidence of delayed hemolytic and delayed serologic transfusion reactions. Transfusion 1999 39 : 1097 103.
8. Nance SJ, Garratty G. A new potentiator of red blood cell antigen-antibody reactions. Am J Clin Pathol 1987 87 : 633 5.
9. Ortho Clinical Diagnostics. ID-MTS gel test procedure manual. Version 3.0. Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics.
10. Roback JD, Combs MR, Grossman BJ, Hillyer CD, editors. Technical manual. 16th ed.
11. Lapierre Y, Rigal D, Adam J, Josef D, Meyer F, Greber S, Drot C. The gel test: a new way to detect red cell antigen-antibody reaction. Transfusion 1990 30 : 109 13.
12. Bromilow IM. Gel techniques in blood group serology. Med Lab Sci 1992 49 : 129 32.
13. Judd WJ, Steiner EA, Knafl PC, Masters C. The gel test: use in the identification of unexpected antibodies to blood group antigens. Immunohematology 1998 14 : 59 62.
14. Casina TS. In search of the Holy Grail: comparison of antibody screening methods. Immunohematology 2006 22 : 196 202.
15. Novaretti MC, Silveria EJ, Filho EC, Dorlhiac-Llacer PE, Chamone DA. Comparison of tube and gel techniques for antibody identification. Immunohematology 2000 16 : 138 41.
16. Combs MR, Bredehoeft SJ. Selecting an acceptable and safe antibody detection test can present a dilemma. Immunohematology 2001 17 : 86 9.