A dynamic algorithm for stabilising LEDBAT congestion window

2nd International Conference on Computer and Network Technology, ICCNT 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 157-161

  Abu, Amuda James ^a   Gordon, Steven ^a  

^a THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Background file transfer; Fairness; Internet congestion control; Peer to peer applications; Transport protocol

Indexed keywords

CONGESTION CONTROL; CONGESTION WINDOW; DELAY SENSITIVE; DYNAMIC ALGORITHM; DYNAMIC CALCULATIONS; FILE SHARING APPLICATION; FILE TRANSFERS; IN-NETWORK; INTERNET CONGESTION CONTROL; PEER-TO-PEER APPLICATION; QUEUE DELAYS; STEADY STATE; TARGET DELAY; TRANSPORT PROTOCOLS;

DATA TRANSFER; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INTERNET;

INTERNET PROTOCOLS;

EID: 77954329178     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCNT.2010.37     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. F. Kelly. Mathematical modelling of the internet. In Fourth International Congress on Industrial and Applied Mathematics, July 1999.
2. P. Key, L. Massoulíe, and B. Wang. Emulating low-priority transport at the application layer: a background transfer service. In ACM SIGMETRICS, pages 118-129. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2004.
3. A. Kuzmanovic and E. W. Knightly. TCP-LP: low-priority service via end-point congestion control. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 14(4):752, 2006.
4. L. S. Brakmo and L. L. Peterson. TCP Vegas: end to end congestion avoidance on a global internet. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13(8), October 1995.
5. S. Liu, M. Vojnovic, and D. Gunawardena. Competitive and considerate congestion control for bulk-data transfers. In Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on QoS, Evanston, IL, USA, volume 9, 2007.
6. Low Extra Delay Background Transport (LEDBAT) Working Group (WG) Charter. http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/ledbat-charter.html.
7. M. Welzl. A survey of lower-than-best effort transport protocols. IETF Internet Draft, (work-in-progress), March 2009.
8. M. Allman, V. Paxson, and W. R. Stevens. TCP congestion control. RFC 2581, IETF, April 1999.
9. ns-2. Network Simulator. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam.
10. J. Postel. Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)-RFC 793, 1981.
11. R. Jain. A delay-based approach for congestion avoidance in interconnected heterogeneous computer networks. Computer Communication Review, 19(5), October 1989.
12. D. Rossi, C. Testa, S. Valenti, P. Veglia, and L. Muscariello. News from the internet congestion control world. CoRR, abs/0908.0812, August 2009. http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0812.
13. S. Shalunov. Low extra delay background transport. In IETF 75, Stockholm, July 2009.
14. S. Shalunov. Low Extra Delay Background Transport (LEDBAT). IETF Internet Draft, (work-in-progress), October 2009. http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-ietf- ledbat-congestion-00.pdf.
15. T. Tsugawa, G. Hasegawa, and M. Murata. Background TCP data transfer with inline network measurement. IEICE Transactions on Communications, 89(8):2152-2160, 2006.
16. V. Jacobson, R. Braden, and D. Borman. TCP extensions for high performance. IETF RFC 1323, May 1992.
17. M. J. Karels, and V. Jacobson. Congestion avoidance and control. ACM Computer Communication Review, 18(4):314-329, 1988.
18. A. Venkataramani, R. Kokku, and M. Dahlin. TCP Nice: A mechanism for background transfers. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 36(SI):343, 2002.