Impact of restrictive fluid balance focused to increase lung procurement on renal function after kidney transplantation

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 2352-2356

  Miñambres, Eduardo ^a   Rodrigo, Emilio ^b   Ballesteros, Maria Angeles ^a   Llorca, Javier ^c,d   Ruiz, Juan Carlos ^b   Fernandez Fresnedo, Gema ^b   Vallejo, Ana ^a   González Cotorruelo, Julio ^b   Arias, Manuel ^b,c  

^a Service of Intensive Care   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MARQUÉS DE VALDECILLA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

^d CIBER EPIDEMIOLOGÍA Y SALUD PÚBLICA CIBERESP   (Spain)

Author keywords

brain dead donors; central venous pressure; delayed graft function; fluid management; graft survival

Indexed keywords

HYPERTENSIVE FACTOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEATH; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; FEMALE; FLUID BALANCE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LUNG TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORGAN PERFUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; URINE VOLUME; WATER DEPRIVATION; DONOR; ELECTROLYTE BALANCE; EVALUATION STUDY; FOLLOW UP; KIDNEY; KIDNEY FUNCTION TEST; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TIME; TRANSPLANTATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LUNG TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN PRESERVATION; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS; WATER-ELECTROLYTE BALANCE;

EID: 77954323360     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq054     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Rosengard BR, Feng S, Alfrey EJ et al. Report of the Crystal City meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor. Am J Transplant 2002; 2: 701-711
2. Roche AM, James M. Fluid therapy in organ transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2007; 12: 281-286
3. Straznicka M, Follette DM, Eisner MD et al. Aggressive management of lung donors classified as unacceptable: excellent recipient survival one year after transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124: 250-258 Available at: http://www.ont.es/infesp/Paginas/DocumentosdeCon-senso.aspx
4. Peeters P, Vanholder R. Therapeutic interventions favorably influencing delayed and slow graft function in kidney transplantation: mission impossible? Transplantation 2008; 85: S31-S37
5. Carlier M, Squifflet JP, Pirson Y et al. Confirmation of the crucial role of the recipient's maximal hydration on early diuresis of the human cadaver renal allograft. Transplantation 1983; 36: 455-456
6. Port FK, Bragg-Gresham JL, Metzger RA et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1281-1286
7. Real Decreto 2070/1999, de 30 de diciembre, por el que se regulan las actividades de obtención y utilización clínica de órganos humanos y la coordinación territorial en materia de donación y trasplante de órganos y tejidos. BOE 3/2000 de 4-1-2000, p. 179-190
8. Halloran PF, Hunsicker LG. Delayed graft function: state of the art, November 10-11, 2000. Summit meeting, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA. Am J Transplant 2001; 1: 115-120
9. Govani MV, Kwon O, Batiuk TD et al. Creatinine reduction ratio and 24-hour creatinine excretion on posttransplant day two: simple and objective tools to define graft function. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 1645-1649
10. Rodrigo E, Ruiz JC, Piñera C et al. Creatinine reduction ratio on post-transplant day two as criterion in defining delayed graft function. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 1163-1169
11. Cecka JM. The OPTN/UNOS Renal Transplant Registry. Clin Transpl 2005; 1-16
12. Hariharan S, Johnson CP, Bresnahan BA et al. Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 605-612
13. Christie JD, Edwards LB, Aurora P et al. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-fifth official adult lung and heart/lung transplantation report\2008. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008; 27: 957-969
14. Miñambres E, Llorca J, Suberviola B et al. Early outcome after single vs bilateral lung transplantation in older recipients. Transplant Proc 2008; 40: 3088-3089
15. Miñambres E, Zurbano F, Naranjo S et al. Mortality analysis of patients undergoing lung transplantation for emphysema. Arch Bronco-neumol 2009; 45: 335-340
16. Mulligan MS, Shearon TH, Weill D et al. Heart and lung transplantation in the United States, 1997-2006. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 977-987
17. Sung RS, Galloway J, Tuttle-Newhall JE et al. Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 1997-2006. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 922-934
18. Orens JB, Boehler A, de Perrot M et al. Pulmonary Council, International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. A review of lung transplant donor acceptability criteria. J Heart Lung Transplant 2003; 22: 1183-1200
19. Angel LF, Levine DJ, Restrepo MI et al. Impact of a lung transplantation donor-management protocol on lung donation and recipient outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174: 710-716
20. Abdelnour T, Rieke S. Relationship of hormonal resuscitation therapy and central venous pressure on increasing organs for transplant. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009; 28: 480-485
21. Giral M, Bertola JP, Foucher Y et al. Effect of brain-dead donor resuscitation on delayed graft function: results of a monocentric analysis. Transplantation 2007; 83: 1174-1181
22. Zukowski M, Bohatyrewicz R, Krawczyk AA. Influence of selected factors on occurrence of delayed kidney graft function: a multivariate analysis. Transplant Proc 2007; 39: 2704-2706
23. Pinsky MR. Hemodynamic monitoring over the past 10years. Crit Care 2006; 10: 117
24. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet J et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 17-60
25. Del Río F, Escudero D, De La Calle B et al. Evaluation and maintenance of the lung donor. Med Intensiva 2009; 33: 40-49