A life cycle greenhouse gas emissions perspective on liquid fuels from unconventional Canadian and US fossil sources

International Journal of Global Warming

Volumn 1, Issue 1-3, 2009, Pages 160-178

  McKellar, Jennifer M ^a   Charpentier, Alex D ^a   Bergerson, Joule A ^b   MacLean, Heather L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

coal to liquids; CTL; gas to liquids; GHG; global warming; greenhouse gas; GTL; LCA; life cycle assessment; oil sands; oil shale; transportation fuels

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954302337     PISSN: 17582083     EISSN: 17582091     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJGW.2009.027087     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. 2 Consultants Inc. (2005) Documentation for Natural Resources Canada’s GHGenius Model 3.0, Prepared for Natural Resources Canada, 15 September.
2. (S and T)2 Consultants Inc. (2006) The Addition of Palm Oil Biodiesel and Coal Derived FT Distillate to GHGenius, Prepared for Natural Resources Canada, 15 May.
3. (S and T)2 Consultants Inc. (2007) 2007 Crude Oil Production Update for GHGenius, Prepared for Natural Resources Canada, 30 March.
4. Alberta Chamber of Resources (ACR) (2004) Oil Sands Technology Roadmap – Unlocking the Potential, 30 January.
5. Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (AEUB) (2005) ‘Alberta’s reserves 2004 and supply/demand outlook/overview 2005’, Statistical Series 2005–98.
6. Bartis, J.T. (2007) ‘Testimony: policy issues for oil shale development’, Presented Before the House Natural Resources Committee, Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, RAND Corporation: Santa Monica, California, 17 April, http://rand.org/pubs/testimonies/2007/RAND_CT279.pdf (accessed 28 April 2008).
7. Bartis, J.T., LaTourrette, T., Dixon, L., Peterson, D.J. and Cecchine, G. (2005) Oil Shale Development in the United States: Prospects and Policy Issues, RAND Corporation: Santa Monica, California.
8. Bergerson, J. and Keith, D. (2006) ‘Life cycle assessment of oil sands technologies’, Alberta Energy Futures Workshop Paper, http://www.iseee.ca/files/iseee/ABEnergyFutures-11.pdf.
9. Brandt, A.R. (2007) ‘Converting Green River oil shale to liquid fuels with the Alberta Taciuk Processor: energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions’, Working paper, 1 June, http://abrandt.berkeley.edu/shale/Brandt%20_ATP_Energy_and_Emissions_dist.pdf.
10. Brandt, A.R. and Farrell, A.E. (2007) ‘Scraping the bottom of the barrel: greenhouse gas emission consequences of a transition to low-quality and synthetic petroleum resources’, Climatic Change, Vol. 84, pp.241–263.
11. Canadian Centre for Energy Information (Centre for Energy) (2007) ‘Energy facts & statistics, Canada’, http://www.centreforenergy.com/FactsStats/statistics.asp?template=5,0 (accessed 6 May 2008).
12. ecoENERGY Carbon Capture and Storage Task Force, The (ecoENERGY) (2008) ‘Canada’s fossil energy future, the way forward on carbon capture and storage’, 9 January, Report to: The Minister of Alberta Energy, The Minister of Natural Resources Canada.
13. Farrell, A.E. and Brandt, A.R. (2006) ‘Risks of the oil transition’, Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 1, pp.1–6.
14. Farrell, A.E., Sperling, D., Arons, S.M., Brandt, A.R., Delucchi, M.A., Eggert, A., Haya, B.K., et al. (2007) ‘A low-carbon fuel standard for California Part 1: technical analysis’, UC Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Center, UCB-ITS-TSRC-RR-2007–2, 29 May, http://repositories.cdlib.org/its/tsrc/UCB-ITS-TSRC-RR-2007.
15. Flint, L. (2004) Bitumen & Very Heavy Crude Upgrading Technology — A Review of Long Term R&D Opportunities, LENEF Consulting Limited, Calgary, Alberta, 31 March.
16. GHGenius Model Ver. 3.11, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON, http://www.ghgenius.ca.
17. Gray, D., White, C., Tomlinson, G., Ackiewicz, M., Schmetz, E. and Winslow, J. (2007) Increasing Security and Reducing Carbon Emissions of the U.S. Transportation Sector: A Transformational Role for Coal with Biomass, DOE/NETL-2007/1298, 24 August, Prepared for the Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory and the Department of Defense, Air Force.
18. Greene, D.L. (1999) An Assessment of Energy and Environmental Issues Related to the Use of Gas-to-Liquid Fuels in Transportation, ORNL/TM-1999/258, Prepared by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corp. for the US Department of Energy.
19. Greenhouse Gas, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) Model Version 1.8b, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, http://www.transportation.anl.gov/software/GREET.
20. Jamieson, A. and McManus, G. (2007) ‘GTL production will partially ease regional diesel, naphtha imbalances’, Oil & Gas Journal, Vol. 105, pp.49–53.
21. Lee, S. (2007a) ‘Clean liquid fuels from coal’, in S. Lee, J.G. Speight and S.K. Loyalka, Handbook of Alternative Fuel Technologies, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
22. Lee, S. (2007b) ‘Shale oil from oil shale’, in S. Lee, J.G. Speight and S.K. Loyalka, Handbook of Alternative Fuel Technologies, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
23. Marland, G. (1983) ‘Carbon dioxide emission rates for conventional and synthetic fuels’, Energy, Vol. 8, pp.981–992.
24. McCulloch, M., Raynolds, M. and Wong, R. (2006) Carbon Neutral 2020 — A Leadership Opportunity in Canada’s Oil Sands, Pembina Institute, Calgary, Alberta, October.
25. 2evolved from oil shale’, Fuel Processing Technology, Vol. 53, pp.41–47.
26. Sundquist, E.T. and Miller, G.A. (1980) ‘Oil shales and carbon dioxide’, Science, Vol. 208, pp.740–741.
27. United States Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (US EERE) (2007a) ‘Coal to liquids production’, http://www.eere.energy.gov/afdc/fuels/emerging_coal_liquids_production.html (accessed 6 May 2008).
28. United States Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (US EERE) (2007b) ‘Gas to liquids benefits’, http://www.eere.energy.gov/afdc/fuels/emerging_gas_liquids_benefits.html (accessed 9 April 2008).
29. United States Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (US EERE) (2007c) ‘Gas to liquids production’, http://www.eere.energy.gov/afdc/fuels/emerging_gas_liquids_production.html (accessed 9 April 2008).
30. United States Department of Energy, The Energy Information Administration (US EIA) (2007) ‘Coal reserves current and back issues’, http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/reserves/reserves.html (accessed 6 May 2008).
31. United States Department of Energy, The Energy Information Administration (US EIA) (2008a) ‘Country energy profiles, top world oil consumers, 2006’, http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/country/index.cfm (accessed 27 April 2008).
32. United States Department of Energy, The Energy Information Administration (US EIA) (2008b) ‘Natural gas reserves summary as of Dec. 31’, http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_enr_sum _dcu_NUS_a.htm (accessed 6 May 2008).
33. United States Department of Energy, The Energy Information Administration (US EIA) (2008c) ‘Sales of distillate fuel oil by end use, U.S., annual’, http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_821dst_dcu_nus_a.htm (accessed 28 May 2008).
34. United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Minerals, Realty and Resource Protection Directorate and Argonne National Laboratory (US BLM and Argonne) (2008a) ‘Oil shale & tar sands programmatic EIS information center, oil shale/tar sands guide, about oil shale’, http://ostseis.anl.gov/guide/oilshale/index.cfm (accessed 26 March 2008).
35. United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Minerals, Realty and Resource Protection Directorate and Argonne National Laboratory (US BLM and Argonne). (2008b) ‘Oil shale & tar sands programmatic EIS information center, oil shale/tar sands guide, about tar sands’, http://ostseis.anl.gov/guide/tarsands/index.cfm (accessed 28 May 2008).
36. Wang, M., Weber, T., Finizza, A. and Wallace, J.P., III (2001) ‘Volume 1, Well-to-wheel energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems, North American analysis, Executive summary report’, General Motors Corporation, Argonne National Laboratory, BP, ExxonMobil and Shell, June.
37. Williams, R.H. and Larson, E.D. (2003) ‘A comparison of direct and indirect liquefaction technologies for making fluid fuels from coal’, Energy for Sustainable Development, VII, pp.103–129.
38. Wu, M. (2008) Personal Communication, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, 8 April.
39. Conversion of coal to Fischer-Tropsch diesel, based on GHGenius process ((S&T)2, 2006).
40. “Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation” (US EIA, 2008a)
41. Conversion of natural gas to Fischer-Tropsch diesel, based on the GHGenius process consuming “1,780 L natural gas per litre of fuel produced” ((S&T)2, 2005).