Spaces for learners and learning: evaluating the impact of technology-rich learning spaces

New Review of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 95-107

  Roberts, Susan ^a   Weaver, Margaret ^b  

^a EDGE HILL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CUMBRIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954300788     PISSN: 13614533     EISSN: 17407834     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13614530701330380     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. American Library Association, 2004. Standards for libraries in higher education. ⟨ http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/standardslibraries.htm⟩ (accessed 27 February 2007).
2. Cowan, J., 2006. On becoming an innovative university teacher, 2nd edition, Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education.
3. Goodyear, P., 2006. Collaborative knowledge work and epistemic fluency. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Networked Learning 2006, Lancaster University, 10–12 April.
4. Higher Education Funding Council for England, 2006. Guide to post occupancy evaluation. London: University of Westminster.
5. Hunley, S. and M., Schaller, 2006. Assessing learning spaces. In Learning spaces, D., Oblinger. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE. ⟨ http://www.educause.edu/learningspaces⟩ (accessed 27 February 2007).
6. stcentury learning space design. Bristol: JISC. ⟨ http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/JISClearningspaces.pdf⟩ (accessed 27 February 2007).
7. Lancaster, F. W., 1993. If you want to evaluate your library …, 2nd edition, London: Library Association Publishing.
8. Massie, E., 2002. “ Blended learning: the magic is in the mix ”. In The ASTD e-learning handbook, Edited by: Rossett, A., Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
9. North West Academic Libraries, 2006. Designing Spaces for Learning Conference. St Martin's College, Lancaster, 8 September.
10. Payne, P., 2006. Approaches and techniques for measuring impact. Tilbury, The Netherlands: Tilburg Centre for Electronic Resources. ⟨www.ticer.nl/06carte/publicat/⟩ (access forbidden).
11. Richardson, J., 2000. Researching student learning approaches to studying in campus based and distance education, Buckingham: SRHE/OU Press.
12. Richardson, J. T. E., 2005. Students’ perceptions of academic quality and approaches to studying in distance education. British Educational Research Journal, 31 (1): 7–27.
13. Saunders, M., 2006. The presence of evaluation theory and practice in educational social development: towards an inclusive approach. London Review of Education, 4 (2): 197–215.
14. Society of College, National and University Libraries, 2006. Value and impact measurement programme: the SCONUL VAMP project. SCONUL Focus 38(Summer/Autumn): 111–12. ⟨ http://www.sconul.ac.uk/publications/newsletter/38/32.pdf⟩ (accessed 27 February 2007).
15. St Martin's College (2004) Corporate plan 2004–2009. ⟨ http://www.ucsm.ac.uk/about⟩ (accessed 27 February 2007).