A comprehensive method for optical-emission computed tomography

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 55, Issue 14, 2010, Pages 3947-3957

  Thomas, Andrew ^a   Bowsher, James ^a   Roper, Justin ^a   Oliver, Tim ^a   Dewhirst, Mark ^a   Oldham, Mark ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D IMAGING; ATTENUATION CORRECTION; COMPREHENSIVE METHOD; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRECTION METHOD; EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; GELATIN PHANTOMS; HIGH RESOLUTION; QUANTITATIVE IMAGING; RECONSTRUCTED IMAGE; SOURCE STRENGTH; TISSUE SAMPLES;

FLUOROPHORES; LIGHT SOURCES; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

GELATIN; TEXAS RED; XANTHENE DERIVATIVE;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL NEOPLASM; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; LIGHT; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; NUDE MOUSE; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; FEMALE; GELATIN; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIGHT; MICE; MICE, NUDE; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; NEOPLASMS, EXPERIMENTAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL; XANTHENES;

EID: 77954293501     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/14/001     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Darrell A, Meyer H, Marias K, Brady M and Ripoll J 2008 Weighted filtered backprojection for quantitative fluorescence optical projection tomography Phys. Med. Biol. 53 3863-81
2. Hudson H M and Larkin R S 1994 Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 13 601-9
3. Kim E, Bowsher J, Thomas A S, Sakhalkar H, Dewhirst M and Oldham M 2008 Improving the quantitative accuracy of optical-emission computed tomography by incorporating an attenuation correction: application to HIF1 imaging Phys. Med. Biol. 53 5371-83
4. Lange K and Carson R 1984 EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 8 306-16
5. Oldham M, Sakhalkar H, Oliver T, Johnson G A and Dewhirst M 2008 Optical clearing of unsectioned specimens for three-dimensional imaging via optical transmission and emission tomography J. Biomed. Opt. 13 021113
6. Oldham M, Sakhalkar H, Wang Y M, Guo P, Oliver T, Bentley R, Vujaskovic Z and Dewhirst M 2007 Three-dimensional imaging of whole rodent organs using optical computed and emission tomography J. Biomed. Opt. 12 014009
7. Sharpe J, Ahlgren U, Perry P, Hill B, Ross A, Hecksher-Sorensen J, Baldock R and Davidson D 2002 Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies Science 296 541-5
8. Shepp L A and Vardi Y 1982 Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1 113-22
9. Soubret A, Ripoll J and Ntziachristos V 2005 Accuracy of fluorescent tomography in the presence of heterogeneities: study of the normalized Born ratio IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 24 1377-86
10. Vinegoni C, Razansky D, Figueiredo J L, Nahrendorf M, Ntziachristos V and Weissleder R 2009 Normalized Born ratio for fluorescence optical projection tomography Opt. Lett. 34 319-21
11. Wang Y and Wang R K 2007 Optimization of image-forming optics for transmission optical projection tomography Appl. Opt. 46 6815-20 (Pubitemid 350240444)