Imperfect use? ICT provisions and human decisions: An Introduction to the special issue on ICT adoption and user choices

Information Society

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 243-246

  Herold, David Kurt ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Adoption; Creative use; ICTs; Society; Usage disjunctures

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954287570     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2010.489497     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Akiyoshi, M., and H. Ono. 2008. The diffusion of mobile Internet in Japan. The Information Society 24:292-303.
2. Apple, Inc. 2010. Get a Mac. Apple. http://www.apple.com/getamac (accessed February 16, 2010).
3. Borgmann, A. 1992. Crossing the postmodern divide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Brown, S. A., V. Venkatesh, and H. Bala. 2006. Household technology use: Integrating household life cycle and the model of adoption of technology in households. The Information Society 22:205-18.
5. Cassidy, E. J. 1998. Preface: Virtual futures. In Virtual futures: Cyberotics, technology and post-human pragmatism, ed. J. B. Dixon and E. J. Cassidy, ix-xii. New York: Routledge.
6. Dinello, D. 2005. Technophobia: Science fiction visions of posthuman technology. Austin: University of Texas Press.
7. Goggin, G., and C. Newell. 2007. The business of digital disability. The Information Society 23: 159-68.
8. Haddon, L. 2005. Introduction. In Everyday innovators: Researching the role of users in shaping ICT's, ed. L. Haddon, E. Mante, B. Sapio, K.-H. Kommonen, L. Fortunati, and A. Kant, 1-16. Dordrecht: Springer.
9. Haddon, L., E. Mante, B. Sapio, K.-H. Kommonen, L. Fortunati, and A. Kant, eds. 2005. Everyday innovators: Researching the role of users in shaping ICT's. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
10. Heath, P., and N. Bell. 2006. The changing world of home technology: A Microsoft case study. The Information Society 22:251-59.
11. Jones, S. E. 2006. Against technology: From the Luddites to Neo- Luddism. New York: Routledge.
12. Kashi, J. 2009. Hi-Tech in the law office: Everything you need to know about buying Digital Cameras. Alaska Bar Rag 33:16-18.
13. Kroker, A. 2001. The possessed individual: Technology and the postmodern. Montreal: New World Perspectives and CTheory Books.
14. Lamb, R., and R. Kling. 2003. Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly 27:197-236.
15. Ling, R. 2008. Should we be concerned that the elderly don't text? The Information Society 24:334-41.
16. McCarthy, J., and P. Wright. 2004. Technology as experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Postman, N. 1993. Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage.
18. Prensky, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9(5):1-6.
19. Rutsky, R. L. 1999. Electronic mediations, Vol. 2, High techne: Art and technology from the machine aesthetic to the posthuman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20. Sassen, S. 2002. The megahertz myth, Apple, AMD and Intel. Hardware Analysis, January 10. http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/ content/article/1465 (accessed February 16, 2010).
21. Shah, A., 2010. HP's Smartbook may battle it out with Apple's iPad. PC World, February 13. http://www.pcworld.com/article/189253/ hps smartbook may battle it out with apples ipad.html (accessed February 16, 2010).
22. Speirs, F. 2010. Future shock. Blog, January 29. http://speirs.org/blog/ 2010/1/29/future-shock.html (accessed February 15, 2010).
23. Suchman, L. A. 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Thorpe, L. J., F. Nagumo, and K. Ike. 1998. The HDTV camcorder and the march to marketplace reality. Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers 107: 164-77.
25. Tobias, J. 2007. Accessibility and Product Ecosystems. The Information Society 23:183-86.
26. Wilding, R. 2009. Refugee youth, social inclusion, and ICTs: Can good intentions go bad? Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 7: 159-74.