Liquid modernity and power: A dialogue with Zygmunt Bauman1

Journal of Power

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 111-130

  Bauman, Zygmunt ^a   Haugaard, Mark ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Civilization; Consumption; Culture; Elites; Liquid modernity; Power

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954272356     PISSN: 17540291     EISSN: 17540305     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17540290802227536     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adorno, T., and Horkheimer, M., 1997 [1972]. Dialectic of enlightenment. London: Verso.
2. Arnold, M., 1993 [1869]. Culture and anarchy. Cambridge University Press.
3. Arnold, M., 2007 [1873]. Literature and dogma. London: Ramsey Press.
4. Bauman, Z., 1999 [1972]. Culture as praxis. London: Sage.
5. Bauman, Z., 2004. Stalin. Cultural Studies: Critical Methodologies, 4(1): 3-11.
6. Bauman, Z., 2006. Liquid fear. Cambridge: Polity.
7. Bourdieu, P., 1986. Distinction. London: Routledge.
8. Burnham, J., 1941. The managerial revolution. New York: Day.
9. Chomsky, N., 2002. On the nature of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 117.
10. Clegg, S., 1989. Frameworks of power. London: Sage.
11. Crozier, M., 1964. The bureaucratic phenomenon. University of Chicago Press.
12. Elias, N., 1994. The civilizing process: The development of manners. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Febvre, L., 1942. Le problème de l’incroyance au XVIe siècle. Paris: A. Michel.
14. Foucault, M., 1970. The order of things. London: Routledge, 113.
15. French, P., 2007/2008. A Hootenanny New Year to All. Observer, Television, 30 December 2007 - 5 January 2008, 6.
16. Fry, S., 2007. Welcome to dork talk. Guardian Weekend, 27 October. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,2198814,00.html
17. Gellner, E., 1983. Nations and nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity.
19. Giddens, A., 1990. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
20. Kirketerp, S.B., 2007. The loving organization. Futureorientation, March, 58-59.
21. Lukes, S., 2005. Power: A radical view. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Mann, T., 1994 [1901]. Buddenbrooks. London: Everyman.
23. Mathiesen, T., 1997. The viewer society. Michel Foucault’s panoptican revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 215-234.
24. McSmith, A. 2007. Cultural elite does not exist, academics claim. Independent [online], 20 December. Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/cultural-elite-does-notexist-academics-claim-766178.html, accessed 8 March 2008.
25. Peterson, R.A., 2005. Changing arts audiences: Capitalizing on omnivorousness. Presented at a workshop at the University of Chicago, 14 October.
26. Petersen, R.A. and Simkus, A., 1992. How musical tastes mark occupational status groups. In M. Lamont and M. Fournier, eds. Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality. University of Chicago Press.
27. Scheler, S., 1997 [1955]. Resentyment i Moralnośćutt. Warsaw: Czytelnik. Originally published as Das Ressentiment im Aufbau der Moralen. In Gesammelte Werke, vol. 3. University of Bern.
28. Steiner, G., 1975. Extraterritorial. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 174.
29. The Guardian [online], 30 December 2007. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/dec/30/climatechange.carbonemissions.
30. Tocqueville, A., 1961 [1835/1840]. Democracy in America, 2 vols. Translated by H. Reeve. New York: Schocken.
31. Weber, M., 2001. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Routledge.