Comparative pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamic modeling on three brands of 10% enrofloxacin oral formulations in broiler chickens

International Journal of Poultry Science

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 273-277

  Gberindyer, Fidelis Aondover ^a   Wannang, Noel ^b   Akwuobu, Chinedu Adive ^a  

^a University of Agriculture   (Nigeria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JOS   (Nigeria)

Author keywords

Brands; Chickens; Enrofloxacin; Pharmacodynamic; Pharmacokinetic; Resistance

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 77954265721     PISSN: 16828356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2010.273.277     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anadon, A., M.R. Martinez-Larranaga, M.J. Diaz and P. Bringas, 1995. Pharmacokinetics and residues of enrofloxacin in chickens. Am. J. Vet. Res., 56: 501-506.
2. Andres, F.G., A. Maria, A.R. Carlos and V. Omar, 2009. Application of microbiological assay to determine pharmaceutical equivalence of generic intravenous antibiotics. BMC Clin. Pharmacol., 9: 1-11.
3. Baggot, J.D., 2001. The physiological Basis of veterinary clinical pharmacology. 1st Edn., Blackwell, London.
4. Bryant, M.C., 1981. The assay of Antibiotics in Body Fluids. In: Laboratory Control of Antibacterial Chemotherapy. 1st Edn., John Wright, London, pp: 102-123.
5. Craig, W.A., 1993. Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial gents as a basis for determination of dosage regimens. E. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 1: 6-8.
6. Dowling, P.M., R.C. Wilson, J.W. Tyler and S.H. Duran, 1995. Pharmacokinetics of Ciprofloxacin in Ponies. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap., 18: 7-12.
7. Ehab, B., M.G. Saad, M.A. Alaeldein, F.S. Ahmad and M.A. Ahmad, 2008. Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of two norfloxacin oral dosage forms (Vapcotril-10%® and Mycomas 10%®) in healthy broiler chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 7: 289-293.
8. Gilbadi, M. and P. Perrier, 1982. Pharmacokinetics. 2nd Edn., Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York.
9. Haritova, A., H. Djeneva, L. Lashev, P. Sotirova, B. Gyurov and M. Stefanova, 2004. Pharmacokinetics and PK/PD modeling of enrofloxacin in Meleagris Gallopavo and gallus domesticus. Bulg. J. Vet. Med., 7: 139-148.
10. Kwasi, B., W.D. Black and M.E. Scott, 1999. Pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin given by oral, intravenous and intramuscular routes in broiler chickens. Canad. J. Vet. Res., 63: 193-200.
11. Lakshmi, K., 2006. Modeling success in PK/PD testing, drug discovery and development.
12. Marie, G., 2007. PK/PD Data analysis 1-basic concept. Med. Prod. Agency.
13. Meinen, J.B., J.T. McClure and E. Rosin, 1995. Pharmacokinetic of enrofloxacin in clinically normal dogs and mice drug pharmacodynamics in neutropenic mice with E. coli and Staphylococcal infections. Am. J. Vet. Res., 38: 732-749.
14. Mouton, J.W. and P.M. Tulkens, 2005. PK/PD modeling: Clinical implication. ICAAC-ISAP PK/PD workshop.
15. Posyniak, A., J. Zmudzki, J. Niedzielska and B. Biernacki, 2007. Bioequivalence study of two formulations of enrofloxacin following oral administration in chickens. Bul. Vet. Res. Inst. Pulawy, 45: 353-358.
16. Randandt, KM., M.C. Randall and M.N. Dudley, 1992. Interactions of fluoroquinolones with other drugs: Mechanisms, variability, clinical significance and management. Clin. Infect. Dis., 14: 272-284.
17. Reiko, S., T. Yusuke, K. Mitsuo, A. Naoki and S. Kihachiro, 2006. Pharmacokinetics-Pharmaco-dynamics relationship of arbekacin for treatment of patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Agent Chemother., 50: 3768-3769.
18. Sanjib, I., C.B. Chandana, M. Pritam and B. Mohan, 2005. Pharmacokinetics studies of enrofloxacin in Yak after intramuscular administration. Ir. J. Pharmacol. Therap., 4: 91-94.
19. Sumano, L.H. and O.L. Gutierrez, 2000. Problematica del uso de la enrofloxacin en la aviculture en Mexico. Vet. Mex., 2: 137-145.
20. Sumano, L.H. and O.L. Gutierrez, 2001. Strategic administration of enrofloxacin in poultry to achieve higher serum concentrations. In: Proceedings of the Fiftieth Western Poultry Disease Conference. University of California, Davis, pp: 45-48.