Ontology-based approach to formalization of competencies

Competencies in Organizational E-Learning: Concepts and Tools

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 185-206

  Ng, April ^a   Hatala, Marek ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954263663     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-343-2.ch008     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
2. Bejcek, A., & Pezzuti, A. (2001). Precision skilling. Retrieved June 16, 2005, from http://www.netg.com/DemoDownloads/Downloads/skilling.pdf
3. Blackmon, W., & Rehak, D. (2003). Customized learning: A Web services approach. In Proceedings of World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (Vol. 1, pp. 6-9). Downloaded from http://www.lsal.cmu.edu/lsal/expertise/papers/conference/edmedia2003/customized20030625.pdf
4. Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J. R., & Benjamins, V. R. (1999). What are ontologies, and why do we need them? Intelligent Systems and their Applications, 14(1), 20-26.
5. Dubois, D., & Rothwell, W. (2004). Competency-based or a traditional approach to training? T + D, 58(4), 46.
6. th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
7. Geerts, G. L., & McCarthy, W. E. (1999). An accounting object infrastructure for knowledge-based enterprise models. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(4), 89-94.
8. HR-XML Consortium. (2004). Competencies (measurable characteristics) recommendation.
9. Karampiperis, P., & Sampson, D. (2004). Adaptive instructional planning using ontologies. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT'04) (pp. 126-130).
10. L'Allier, J. J. (1997). Frame of reference: NETg's map to its products, their structures and core beliefs. Retrieved June 16, 2005, from http://www.netg.com/DemoDownloads/Downloads/Frame_Reference.pdf
11. Learning Technology Standards Committee of the IEEE. (2004). Draft standard for learning technology: Reusable competency definitions
12. Learning Technology Standards Committee of the IEEE. (2002). Draft standard for learning object metadata (No. IEEE 1484.12.1-2002)
13. nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Lake Publishing.
14. Martinez, M. (2002). Designing learning objects to personalize learning. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects (p. 152). Bloomington, IN: Agency for Instructional Technology.
15. Mwanza, D., & Engestrom, Y. (2005). Managing content in e-learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 453-453.
16. Najjar, J., Ternier, S., & Duval, E. (2003). The actual use of metadata in ariadne: An empirical analysis. Proceedings of 3rd annual ariadne conference, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. Retrieved from http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~stefaan/papers/ActualUseOfMetadata.pdf
17. Neven, F., & Duval, E. (2002). Reusable learning objects: A survey of LOM-based repositories.In Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on multimedia (.MULTIMEDIA'02) (pp. 291-294). Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1145/641007.641067
18. Sanchez, R., & Heene, A. (2000). Theory development for competence-based management. Stanford, CT: JAI Press.
19. Sánchez-Alonso, S., & Sicilia, M. (2005, May). Normative specifications of learning objects and learning processes: Towards higher levels of automation in standardized e-learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 36(3), 453-463,
20. Schmidt, A. (2004). Context-steered learning: The learning in process approach. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004 (pp. 684-686).
21. Shen, L., & Shen, R. (2004). Learning content recommendation service based-on simple sequencing specification. In Proceedings of Advances in Web-Based Learning: ICWL 2004: Third International Conference (pp. 363-370).
22. The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. (2004). The CA candidates' competency map: Understanding the professional competencies of CAs.
23. W3C. (2003). Web ontology language (OWL) use cases and requirements. Retrieved June 13, 2005 from http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webont-req-20030203/
24. Wiley, D. A. (2002). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects (p. 3). Bloomington, IN: Agency for Instructional Technology.
25. Woelk, D. (2002). E-learning: Semantic Web services and competency ontologies. World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications, 2002(1), 2077-2078. Retrieved from http://dl.aace.org/10523