The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences

Child Development

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 480-486

  Veenstra, Rene ^a   Lindenberg, Siegwart ^a   Munniksma, Anke ^a   Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CHILD; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; MALE; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIOMETRIC STATUS; VICTIM;

CHILD; CRIME VICTIMS; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; MALE; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REJECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIOMETRIC TECHNIQUES;

EID: 77954260119     PISSN: 00093920     EISSN: 14678624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01411.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Barkow, J. H. (1989). Darwin, sex, and status: Biological approaches to mind and culture. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
4. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human-motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
5. Buhrmester, D. (1990). Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. Child Development, 61, 1101-1111.
6. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental change in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147-163.
7. Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2007). Same-gender and cross-gender peer acceptance and peer rejection and their relation with bullying and helping among preadolescents: A goal-framing approach. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1377-1389.
8. Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2008). Beyond the class norm: Bullying behavior of popular adolescents and its relation to peer acceptance and rejection. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1289-1299.
9. Espelage, D. L., Mebane, S. E., & Adams, R. S. (2004). Empathy, caring, and bullying: Toward an understanding of complex associations. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 37-61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Guerra, N. G., Huesmann, L. R., & Spindler, A. (2003). Community violence exposure, social cognition, and aggression among urban elementary school children. Child Development, 74, 1561-1576.
11. Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2004). Aggressive victims, passive victims, and bullies: Developmental continuity or developmental change? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 17-38.
12. Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279-309.
13. Hodges, E. V. E., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 94-101.
14. Huberman, B. A., Loch, C. H., & Önçüler, A. (2004). Status as a valued resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 103-114.
15. Jarvinen, D. W., & Nicholls, J. G. (1996). Adolescents' social goals, beliefs about the causes of social success, and satisfaction in peer relations. Developmental Psychology, 32, 435-441.
16. Lindenberg, S. (2001). Social rationality versus rational egoism. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 635-668). New York: Plenum.
17. Lindenberg, S. (2006). Prosocial behavior, solidarity, and framing processes. In D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, & S. Lindenberg (Eds.), Solidarity and prosocial behavior. An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 23-43). Berlin: Springer.
18. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Luthar, S. S., & McMahon, T. J. (1996). Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlates. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 581-603.
20. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes. Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
21. MacDonald, K. (1992). Warmth as a developmental construct: An evolutionary analysis. Child Development, 63, 753-773.
22. Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119-1134.
23. O'Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437-452.
24. Oldehinkel, A. J., Rosmalen, J. G. M., Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., & Ormel, J. (2007). Being admired or being liked: Classroom social status and depressive problems in early adolescent girls and boys. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 417-427.
25. Olthof, T., & Goossens, F. A. (2008). Bullying and the need to belong: Early adolescents' bullying-related behavior and the acceptance they desire and receive from particular classmates. Social Development, 17, 24-46.
26. Olweus, D. (1996). The Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen.
27. Ormel, J., Lindenberg, S., Steverink, N., & Vonkorff, M. (1997). Quality of life and social production functions: A framework for understanding health effects. Social Science and Medicine, 45, 1051-1063.
28. Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys: Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47, 142-163.
29. Pendell, S. D. (2002). Affection in interpersonal relationships: Not just "a fond or tender feeling." Communication Yearbook, 26, 70-115.
30. Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. (2000). Aggression and sociometric status among peers: Do gender and type of aggression matter? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 17-24.
31. Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies' status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 57-67.
32. Smith, D. A., & Brame, R. (2003). Tobit models in social science research. Some limitations and a more general alternative. Sociological Methods & Research, 31, 364-388.
33. Tobin, J. (1953). Estimation for relationships with limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26, 24-36.
34. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B. J. H., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: Testing a dual perspective theory. Child Development, 78, 1843-1854.