Simulation and analysis of 3-D magnetic flux leakage

IEEE Transactions on Magnetics

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1966-1972

  Dutta, Sushant M ^a   Ghorbel, Fathi H ^a   Stanley, Roderic K ^b  

^a Rice University   (United States)

^b NDE Information Consultants   (United States)

Author keywords

Flaw sizing; Lift off; Magnetic flux leakage; Nondestructive evaluation; Tangential component

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL MODEL; CRITICAL PARTS; DEFECT SHAPES; LIFT-OFF COMPENSATION; MAGNETIC DIPOLE; MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE; NON DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION; SCALE INVARIANCE; SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS; SIMULATION RESULT; SURFACE BREAKING DEFECTS; TANGENTIAL COMPONENTS;

DEFECTS; MAGNETIC STRUCTURE; MAGNETISM; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

MAGNETIC LEAKAGE;

EID: 77954243907     PISSN: 00189464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2008.2011896     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. N. Zatsepin and V. Shcherbinin, "Calculation of the magnetostatic field of surface defects. I. Field topography of defect models," Defek-toskopiya, no.5, pp. 50-59, Sep.-Oct. 1966.
2. I. Novikova and N. Miroshin, "Investigation of the fields of artificial open flaws in a uniform constant magnetic field," Defektoskopiya, no.4, pp. 95-101, Aug. 1973.
3. V. Shcherbinin and A. Pashagin, "On the volume polarization of cracks," Defektoskopiya, no.4, pp. 106-110, Jul.-Aug. 1974.
4. G. Burtsev and E. Fedorishcheva, "Simple approximation for the magnetostatic fields of surface defects and inhomogeneities," Defek-toskopiya, no.2, pp. 111-119, Mar.-Apr. 1974.
5. W. Ko and P. Francis, "Magnetic field leakage due to a surface crack," Brit. J. NDT, pp. 141-144, 1975.
6. V. Shcherbinin and A. Pashagin, "Effect of the boundaries of the specimen on the defect field," Defektoskopiya, no.2, pp. 85-89, Mar.-Apr. 1976.
7. I. Uetake and T. Saito, "Magnetic flux leakage by adjacent parallel surface slots," NDT & E Int., vol.30, no.6, pp. 371-376, 1997.
8. F. Forster, "New findings in the field of non-destructive magnetic leakage field inspection," NDT Int., vol.19, no.1, pp. 3-14, Feb. 1986.
9. C. Edwards and S. Palmer, "The magnetic leakage field of surface-breaking cracks," J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol.19, pp. 657-673, 1986.
10. C. Mandache and L. Clapham, "A model for magnetic flux leakage signal predictions," J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol.36, pp. 2427-2431, 2003.
11. K. Mandal and D. Atherton, "A study of magnetic flux-leakage signals," J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol.31, pp. 3211-3217, 1998.
12. C. Mandache, B. Shiari, and L. Clapham, "Defect separation considerations in magnetic flux leakage inspection," Insight, vol.47, no.5, pp. 289-293, May 2005.
13. M. Siebert and J. Sutherland, "Application of the circumferential component of magnetic flux leakage measurement for in-line inspection of pipelines," BJ Pipeline Inspection Services, Calgary, BC, Canada, Tech. Rep., 1999.
14. J. Wilson and G. Tian, "3D magnetic field sensing for magnetic flux leakage defect characterization," Insight, vol.48, no.6, pp. 357-359, June 2006.
15. Y. Li, J. Wilson, and G. Tian, "Experiment and simulation study of 3D magnetic field sensing for magnetic flux leakage defect characterization, " NDT & E Int., vol.40, pp. 179-184, 2007.
16. S. Dutta, F. Ghorbel, and R. Stanley, "Dipole modeling of magnetic flux leakage," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol.45, no.4, pp. 1959-1965, Apr. 2009.
17. J. Nestleroth and T. Bubenik, "Magnetic flux leakage technology for natural gas pipeline inspection," Topical Report to Gas Research Institute, Tech. Rep. GRI-00/0180, Feb. 1999 [Online]. Available: http:// www.battelle.org/pipetechnology/MFL/MFL98Main.html