Sex differences in perceptions of benefits and costs of mate poaching

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 441-445

  Davies, Alastair P C ^a   Shackelford, Todd K ^a   Hass, R Glen ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Infidelity; Mate poaching; Sex differences

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954243519     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bleske A.L., Shackelford T.K. Poaching, promiscuity, and deceit: Combating mating rivalry in same-sex friendships. Personal Relationships 2001, 8:407-424.
2. Buss D.M. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypothesis tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Science 1989, 12:1-49.
3. Buss D.M., Schmitt D.P. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review 1993, 100:204-232.
4. Daly M., Wilson M. Homicide 1988, Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, NY.
5. Davies A.P.C., Shackelford T.K., Hass G.R. When a " poach" is not a poach: Redefining human mate poaching and re-estimating its frequency. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2007, 36:702-716.
6. Holinger P.C. Violent deaths in the United States 1987, Guilford Press, New York.
7. Nakagawa S. A farewell to Bonferroni: The problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behavioral Ecology 2004, 15:1044-1045.
8. Parker J., Burkley M. Who»s chasing whom? The impact of gender and relationship status on mate poaching. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009, 45:1016-1019.
9. Schmitt D.P., Alcalay L., Allik J., Angleitner A., Ault L., Austers I., et al. Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: The effects of sex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person»s partner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 86:560-584.
10. Schmitt D.P., Buss D.M. Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 86:560-584.
11. Simpson J.A., Gangestad S.W. Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991, 60:870-883.
12. Sisco M., Figueredo A.J. Similarities between men and women in non-traditional aggressive sexuality: Prevalence, novel approaches to assessment and treatment applications. Journal of Sexual Aggression 2008, 14:253-266.
13. Thornhill R., Palmer C.T. A natural history of rape: Biological bases of sexual coercion 2000, MIT Press, MA.
14. Tooby J., Cosmides L. The psychological foundations of culture. The adapted mind 1992, 19-136. Oxford University Press, New York. J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, J. Tooby (Eds.).
15. Waynforth D., Dunbar R.I.M. Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: Evidence from «lonely hearts» advertisements. Behaviour 1995, 132:755-779.