Dancing with postmodernity: Web 2.0+ as a new epistemic learning space

Web 2.0-Based E-Learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 343-364

  Eijkman, Henk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954236161     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-294-7.ch018     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Aldrich, C. (2006, November 20). Second Life is not a teaching tool [Web log post]. The Learning Circuits Blog. Retrieved October 12, 2008, from http://learningcircuits.blogspot.com/2006/11/second-life-is-not-teaching-tool.html
2. Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 32-44.
3. Allen, M. (1999, March). Don't be a troll! Using the Internet for successful higher education. Paper presented at Higher Education '99, Sydney.
4. Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Bristol, UK: Joint Information Systems Committee. Retrieved November 28, 2008, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
5. Beetham, H. (2007). Learners' experiences of e-learning. A briefing for the PVC Network: e-learning Special Interest Group. Bristol, UK: Joint Information Systems Committee. Retrieved September 6, 2008, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearningpedagogy/pspvcelearningsigbriefingpaperfinal.pdf
6. Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (Eds.). (2007). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning. London: Routledge.
7. Beniger, J. R. (1989). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Berman, M. (1982). All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
9. Berners-Lee, T. (2007, March 27). Giant Global Graph [Web log post]. timbl's blog. Retrieved May 23, 2008, from http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/215
10. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.
11. Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
12. Boorstin, D. J. (1980). The fertile verge: Creativity in the United States. An address given at the Carnegie Symposium on Creativity, the Inaugural Meeting of the Library of Congress Council of Scholars, November 19-20, 1980. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
13. Boyd, D. (2005). Why Web 2.0 matters: Preparing for glocalization [Web log post]. apophenia. Retrieved March 17, 2008, from http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2005/09/05/why_web20_matte.html
14. Boyd, D. (2008). None of this is real. In Karaganis, J. (Ed.), Structures of participation in digital culture (pp. 132-157). New York: Social Science Research Council.
15. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2002). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
16. Bruner, J. (2003). The narrative construction of reality. In Mateas, M., & Sengers, P. (Eds.), Narrative intelligence (pp. 41-62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Burger, T. N. (2007, January 22). Libraries facilitate open access to information with open source software. Linux.com. Retrieved August 29, 2008, from http://www.linux.com/articles/59491
18. Carter, S. M., & Little, M. (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1316-1328. doi:10.1177/1049732307306927
19. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
20. Child, M. L. (2007, February 26). Professors split on wiki debate. The Harvard Crimson. Retrieved November 6, 2008, from http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=517305
21. Chowcat, I., Phillips, B., Popham, J., & Jones, I. (2008, July) Harnessing technology: Preliminary identification of trends affecting the use of technology for learning. Coventry, UK: Becta. Retrieved January 19, 2009, from http://emergingtechnologies.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/partners/ht_trends_july08.pdf
22. Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6). Retrieved January 19, 2009, from http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2125/1972
23. Crook, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape-opportunities, challenges and tensions. Coventry, UK: Becta. Retrieved January 10, 2009, from http://research.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/web2_technologies_learning.pdf
24. Dede, C. (2008). A seismic shift in epistemology. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(3), 80-81. Retrieved January 9, 2009, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0837.pdf
25. Downes, S. (2006, October 16). Learning networks and connective knowledge. Retrieved January 9, 2009, from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper92/paper92.html
26. Eijkman, H. (2003). Online learning as curricular justice? A critical framework for higher education. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
27. Eijkman, H. (2004, November 26-28). Contingency, curriculum and solidarity: A social constructionist response to the academic divide in Australian higher education. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia Conference. Melbourne, Australia.
28. Eijkman, H. (2008). Web 2.0 as a non-foundational network-centric learning space. CampusWide Information Systems, 25(2), 93-104. doi:10.1108/10650740810866567
29. Eijkman, H. (in press). How academics view Wikipedia: Web 2.0+ and the change in academic power-knowledge arrangements. Campus-Wide Information Systems.
30. Eijkman, H., & Clarke, B. (2007). Towards a participatory learning and assessment culture in higher education: Leveraging aocial rechnologies to reframe our curricular practices. In K. Fernstrom (Ed.), Readings in technology in education: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education. Abbostsford, BC: University of the Fraser Valley.
31. Eijkman, H., & Herrmann, A. (2009, March 25-27) Beyond stereotyping: Understanding student readiness for network centric learning. Paper presented at the Defence Academies and Colleges eLearning Conference, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
32. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. (A. M. Sheridan-Smith, Trans.). London: Tavistock. (1969).
33. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (A. M. Sheridan-Smith, Trans.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. (1975).
34. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-77 (Gordeon, C., Ed.). Brighton, UK: Harvester.
35. Freedman, T. (Ed.). (2006). coming of age: An introduction to the new World Wide Web. Ilford, UK: Terry Freedman. Retrieved November 25, 2008, from http://fullmeasure.co.uk/Coming_of_age_v1-2.pdf
36. Garfinkel, S. L. (2008, November/December). Wikipedia and the meaning of truth: Why the online encyclopedia's epistemology should worry those who care about traditional notions of accuracy. Technology Review, 84-86.
37. Gee, J. P. (1999). Language, learning, and latecomers: Discourses in education. Unpublished manuscript.
38. Gee, J. P., Hull, G., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
39. Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.
40. Goldberg, K. (2000). The robot in the garden: Telerobotics and telepistemology in the age of the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Goodwin, B. C. (1999). From control to participation via a science of qualities. ReVision, 21(4), 26-35.
42. Heim, M. (1999). Transmogrification. Retrieved February 7, 2009, from http://www.mheim.com/files/transmog.pdf
43. Hinchcliffe, D. (2006, September 4). All we got was Web 1.0, when Tim Berners-Lee actually gave us Web 2.0 [Web log post]. Dion Hinchcliffe's Web 2.0 Blog. Retrieved October 8, 2009, from http://web2.socialcomputingjournal.com/all_we_got_was_web_10_when_tim_bernerslee_actually_gave_us_w.htm
44. Hruby, G. G. (2001). Sociological, postmodern, and new realism perspectives in social constructionism: Implications for literacy research. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(1), 48-62. doi:10.1598/RRQ.36.1.3
45. Huijser, H. J. (2008). Exploring the educational potential of social networking sites: The fine line between exploiting opportunities and unwelcome imposition. Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development, 5(3), 45-54. Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://sleid.cqu.edu.au/include/getdoc.php?id=708&article=199&mode=pdf
46. Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Evaluating constructivistic learning. Educational Technology, 31(9), 28-33.
47. Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: How today's Internet is killing our culture. New York: Doubleday.
48. Kenway, J., & Bullen, E. (2005). Globalizing the young in the age of desire: Some educational policy issues. In Apple, M. W., Kenway, J., & Singh, M. (Eds.), Globalizing education: Policies, pedagogies, & politics (pp. 31-43). New York: Peter Lang.
49. Lankshear, C. (2003). The challenge of digital epistemologies. Education Communication and Information, 3(2), 167-186. doi:10.1080/14636310303144
50. Lather, P. (1989, August 25-27). Deconstructing/deconstructive inquiry: Issues in feminist research methodologies. Paper presented at the New Zealand Women's Studies Association Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand.
51. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer. doi:10.4324/9780203304846
52. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Levin, D., & Arafeh, S. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved October 28, 2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2002/PIP_Schools_Internet_Report.pdf.pdf
54. Lohnes, S., & Kinzer, C. (2007). Questioning assumptions about students' expectations for technology in college classrooms. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(5). Retrieved January 12, 2009, from, http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=431
55. Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (1979).
56. Lyotard, J.-F. (1993). A svelte appendix to the postmodern question. In Political writings (pp. 25-29). (Readings, B., & Geiman, K. P., Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
57. Moody, G. (2006, February 22). Parallel universes: Open access and open source. LWN.net. Retrieved May 17, 2008, from http://lwn.net/Articles/172781/
58. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved May 17, 2008, from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
59. Owen, M., Grant, L., Sayers, S., & Facer, K. (2006). Social software and learning. Bristol, UK: Futurelab. Retrieved January 12, 2009, from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/opening_education/Social_Software_report.pdf
60. Porter, J. (1992). Audience and rhetoric: An archaeological composition of the discourse community. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
61. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63. Schiltz, M., Truyen, F., & Coppens, H. (2007). Cutting the trees of knowledge: Social software, information architecture and their epistemic consequences. Thesis Eleven, 89(1), 94-114.
64. Selwyn, N. (2007, October 16-17). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning-a critical review. Paper presented at the CERI-KERIS International Expert Meeting on ICT and Educational Performance, Cheju Island, South Korea. Retrieved March 2, 2008, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/3/39458556.pdf
65. Selwyn, N. (Ed.). (2008). Education 2.0? Designing the web for teaching and learning. London: Teaching and Learning Research Programme, Institute of Education, University of London. Retrieved January 12, 2009, from http://www.tlrp.org/tel/files/2008/11/tel_comm_final.pdf
66. Siemens, G. (2008, May 21). A seismic shift in epistemology [Web log post]. elearnspace. Retrieved January, 9, 2009, from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2008/05/21/a-seismic-shiftin-epistemology/
67. Thompson, J. (2007). Is Education 1.0 ready for Web 2.0 students? Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4). Retrieved February 11, 2008, from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=393
68. Toulmin, S. E. (1990). Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. New York: Free Press.
69. Ugoretz, J. (2006, June 9). Three stars and a chili pepper: Social software, folksonomy, and user reviews in the college context. Academic Commons. Retrieved January 12, 2009, from http://www.academiccommons.org/commons/essay/Ugoretz-social-software-folksonomy
70. Weinberger, D. (2006). The new shape of knowledge: From trees to piles of leaves [Webcast]. Retrieved January 16, 2009, from http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/?view=Webcast&ID=20051130_109
71. Welch, D. J. (2008) Virtual worlds: Moving beyond today. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(5), 12-13. Retrieved January 16, 2009, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0858.pdf
72. Wenger, E. (1998). communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
73. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.