Optimizing the compacity of ceramic membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 360, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 483-492

  Ghidossi, R ^a   Carretier, E ^b   Veyret, D ^c   Dhaler, D ^d   Moulin, P ^b  

^a ISVV   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^d Site St Maurice de Beynost   (France)

Author keywords

Ceramic membrane; CFD; Compacity; Optimization; Porous media

Indexed keywords

CFD; COMPACITY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS ANALYSIS; CUT-OFF; FILTRATION AREA; MANUFACTURING CONSTRAINT; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; OPTIMAL GEOMETRY; OPTIMIZED GEOMETRIES; PERMEATE FLOW; PERMEATE FLUX; POROUS MEDIA; SPECIFIC AREAS; VARYING PARAMETERS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOMETRY; OPTIMIZATION; POROUS MATERIALS;

CERAMIC MEMBRANES;

WATER;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOW RATE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEMBRANE FILTER; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 77954213110     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.05.050     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ghidossi R., Veyret D., Moulin P. Computational fluid dynamics applied to membranes: state of the art and opportunities. Chemical Engineering and Processing 2006, 45:437-454.
2. Pak A., Mohammadi T., Hosseinalipour S.M., Allahdini V. CFD modeling of porous membranes. Desalination 2008, 222:482-488.
3. Liu Y., Gaohong H., Xudong L., Gongkui X., Baojun L. CFD simulations of turbulent flow in baffle-filled membrane tubes. Separation and Purification Technology 2009, 67:14-20.
4. Shirazian S., Moghadassi A., Moradi S. Numerical simulation of mass transfer in gas-liquid hollow fiber membrane contactors for laminar flow conditions. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 2009, 17:708-718.
5. Berman A.S. Laminar flow in channels with porous walls. Journal of Applied Physics 1953, 24:1232-1235.
6. Terrill R.M. Laminar flow in a uniformly porous channel. Aeronautical 1964, 15:299-310.
7. Mizushina T., Takeshita S., Unno G. Study of flow in a porous tube with radial mass flux. Journal of Chemical Engineering 1971, 4:135-142.
8. Ghidossi R., Daurelle J.V., Veyret D., Moulin P., Simplified CFD approach of a hollow fiber ultrafiltration system. Chemical Engineering Journal 2006, 123:117-125.
9. Das D.B., Nassehi V., Wakeman R.J. A finite volume model for the hydrodynamics of combined free and porous flow in sub-surface regions. Advances in Environmental Research 2002, 7:35-58.
10. Springer F., Ghidossi R., Carretier E., Veyret D., Dhaler D., Moulin P. Optimisation of the ceramic membrane geometry using CFD effect of wall shear stress. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 2010, 1-4.
11. Marcos B., Moresoli C., Skorepova J., Vaughan B. CFD modeling of a transient hollow fiber ultrafiltration system for protein concentration. Journal of Membrane Science 2009, 337:136-144.
12. Dolecek P. Mathematical modelling of permeate flow in multichannel ceramic membrane. Journal of Membrane Science 1995, 100:111-119.
13. Dolecek P., Cakl J. Permeate flow in hexagonal 19-channel inorganic membrane under filtration and backflush operating modes. Journal of Membrane Science 1998, 149:171-179.
14. Friedman M., Gillis J. Viscous flow in a pipe with absorbing walls. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1967, 34:819-827.
15. Nassehi V. Modelling of combined Navier-Stokes and Darcy flows in crossflow membrane filtration. Chemical Engineering Science 1998, 53:1253-1265.