A seismic shift in U.S. federal arts policy: A tale of organizational challenge and controversy in the 1990s

Journal of Arts Management Law and Society

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 7-23

  Shockley, Gordon ^a   McNeely, Connie L ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical theory; National endowment for the arts; Pierre Bourdieu; Theodore Adorno; U.S. Cultural policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954205283     PISSN: 10632921     EISSN: 19403364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JAML.39.1.7-23     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Adorno, T. W. 1982a. Commitment. In Arato and Gebhardt 1982a, 300-318.
2. Adorno, T. W. 1982b. On the fetish-character in music and the regression of listening. In Arato and Gebhardt 1982a, 270-99.
3. Adorno, T. W. 1989. The culture industry reconsidered. Trans. A. G. Rabinbach. In Bronner and Kellner 1989a, 128-35.
4. Adorno, T. W. 1997. Aesthetic theory. Trans. R. Hullot-Kentor. Vol. 88. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
5. Arato, A., and E. Gebhardt, eds. 1982a. The essential Frankfurt School reader. New York: Continuum.
6. Arato, A., and E. Gebhardt, eds. 1982b. Esthetic theory and cultural criticism. In Arato and Gebhardt 1982a, 185-224.
7. Biddle, L. 1988. Introd. to Wyszomirski 1988b, 1-8.
8. Bolton, R. 1992. Introd. to Culture wars: Documents from the recent controversies in the arts, ed. R. Bolton, 3-26. New York: New Press.
9. Boren, S. 1994. Arts and humanities: Funding and reauthorization. Bethesda, MD: University Publications of America.
10. Boren, S. 1996. Arts and humanities: Funding and reauthorization in the 104th Congress. Bethesda, MD: University Publications of America.
11. Boren, S. 1998. Arts and humanities: Funding and reauthorization in the 105th Congress. Bethesda, MD: University Publications of America.
12. Bourdieu, P. 1980. The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
13. Bourdieu, P. 1993a. The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. In Johnson 1993b, 29-73.
14. 1993b. The production of belief: Contribution to an economy of symbolic goods. In Johnson 1993b, 74-111.
15. Bourdieu, P., and L. J. D. Wacquant, eds. 1992a. Invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
16. Bourdieu, P., and L. J. D. Wacquant, eds. 1992b. The purpose of reflexive sociology (the Chicago workshop). In Bourdieu and Wacquant 1992a, 61-216.
17. Brenson, M. 2001. Visionaries and outcasts: The NEA, Congress, and the place of the visual artist in America. New York: New Press.
18. Bronner, S. E., and D. M. Kellner, eds. 1989a. Critical theory and society: A reader. New York: Routledge.
19. Bronner, S. E., and D. M. Kellner, eds. 1989b. Introd. to Bronner and Kellner 1989a, 1-21.
20. Cargo, R. A. 1995. Cultural policy in the era of shrinking government. Policy Studies Review 14 (1-2): 215-24.
21. Cooper, J. F. 1995. Introduction to the NEA. In The national endowments: A critical symposium, ed. L. Jarvik, H. I. London, and J. F. Cooper, 55-77. Los Angeles: Second Thoughts Books.
22. Cowen, T. 1998. In praise of commercial culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
23. Danto, A. C. 1999. Bourdieu on art: Field and individual. In Shusterman 1999, 214-19.
24. DiMaggio, P. J. 2000. Social structure, institutions, and cultural goods: The case of the United States. In The politics of culture: Policy perspectives for individuals, institutions, and communities, ed. G. Bradford, M. Gary, and G. Wallach, 38-62. New York: New Press.
25. DiMaggio, P. J., and B. Pettit. 1999. Public opinion and political vulnerability: Why has the National Endowment for the Arts been such an attractive target? Working Paper 7, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton Univ.
26. Dubin, S. C. 1992. Arresting images: Impolitic art and uncivil actions. New York: Routledge.
27. Dyke, C. 1999. Bourdieuean dynamics: The American middle-class self-constructs. In Shusterman 1999, 192-213.
28. Greenwood, A. R. 1998. Appropriations for FY1999: Interior and related agencies. Bethesda, MD: University Publications of America.
29. Grenfell, M., and C. Hardy. 2007. Art rules: Pierre Bourdieu and the visual arts. New York: Berg.
30. Heclo, H. 1978. Issue networks and the executive establishment. In The new American political system, ed. A. King, 87-124. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
31. Hirschfeld, J. R. 2000. NEA and the art of pleasing Congress. CQ Weekly 58 (June 10): 1373-75.
32. Hoekstra, P. 1997. A creative and generous America: The healthy state of the arts in America and the continued failure of the National Endowment for the Arts (chairman's report). Washington, DC: House Committee on Education and the Workforce / Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation.
33. Horkheimer, M. 1982. The end of reason. In Arato and Gebhardt 1982a, 26-48.
34. Horkheimer, M. 1989. The state of contemporary philosophy. Trans. P. Wagner. In Bronner and Kellner 1989a, 25-36.
35. Hunter, J. D. 1991. Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.
36. Independent Commission. 1990. A report to Congress on the National Endowment for the Arts. Washington, DC: Independent Commission.
37. Jarvik, L., H. I. London, and J. F. Cooper. 1995. Can the NEA be fixed? Introductory comments. In The national endowments: A critical symposium, ed. L. Jarvik, H. I. London, and J. F. Cooper, 59-63. Los Angeles: Second Thoughts Books.
38. Johnson, R. 1993a. Editor's introduction: Pierre Bourdieu on art, literature and culture. In Johnson 1993b, 1-25.
39. Johnson, R. ed. 1993b. The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
40. Kimbis, T. P. 1997a. Planning to survive: How the National Endowment for the Arts restructured itself to serve a new constituency. Columbia-VLA Journal of Law and the Arts 21 (3-4): 239-72.
41. Kimbis, T. P. 1997b. Surviving the storm: How the National Endowment for the Arts restructured itself to serve a new constituency. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 27 (2): 139-58.
42. Larson, G. O. 1983. The reluctant patron: The United States government and the arts, 1943-1965. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
43. Lohmann, H. M. 1992. Adorno's Aesthetic theory. In Adorno: An introduction, ed. W. van Reijen, trans. D. Engelbrecht, 73-84. Philadelphia: Pennbridge.
44. Lowi, T. J. 1979. The end of liberalism: The second republic of the United States. 2nd ed. New York: Norton.
45. Marcuse, H. 1964. One-dimensional man. Boston: Beacon Press.
46. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1993. The public patron: Drafting a mandate for a federal arts agency (conference proceedings, June 18-19). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
47. McNeely, C. L., and G. Shockley. 2006. Deconstructing U.S. arts policy: A dialectical exposition of the excellence-access debate. Social Justice 33 (3): 45-62.
48. Miles, Steven. 2001. Social theory in the real world. London: Sage.
49. Miller, T. 2000. The National Endowment for the Arts in the 1990s: A black eye on the arts? American Behavioral Scientist 43 (6): 1429-46.
50. Moen, M. 1997. Congress and the National Endowment for the Arts: Institutional patterns and arts funding, 1965-1994. Social Science Journal 34 (2): 185-200.
51. Mulcahy, K. V. 1985. The NEA as public patron of the arts. In Art, ideology, and politics, ed. J. H. Balfe and M. J. Wyszomirski, 315-41. New York: Praeger.
52. Mulcahy, K. V. 1988. The politics of cultural oversight: The reauthorization process and the National Endowment for the Arts. In Wyszomirski 1988b, 63-86.
53. National Endowment for the Arts. 1997. National Endowment for the Arts: 1997 annual report. Washington, DC: Office of Communications.
54. National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569 (1998).
55. Piccone, P. 1982. Gen. introd. to Arato and Gebhardt 1982a, ix-xxi.
56. Shusterman, R., ed. 1999. Bourdieu: A critical reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
57. USGPO. 1995. National Endowment for the Arts Chairman Jane Alexander's testimony on FY96 Department of Interior and related agencies appropriations. Washington, DC: Federal Document Clearing House.
58. Wacquant, L. J. D. 1992. Toward a social praxeology: The structure and logic of Bourdieu's sociology. In Bourdieu and Wacquant 1992a, 1-60.
59. Wyszomirski, M. J. 1988a. Budgetary politics and legislative support: The arts in Congress. In Wyszomirski 1988b, 9-33.
60. Wyszomirski, M. J. ed. 1988b. Congress and the arts. New York: American Council for the Arts.
61. Wyszomirski, M. J. 1988c. Congress, presidents, and the arts: Collaboration and struggle. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 499:125-35.
62. Wyszomirski, M. J. 1995. The politics of arts policy: Subgovernment to issue network. In America's commitment to culture: Government and the arts, ed. K. V. Mulcahy and M. J. Wyszomirski, 47-73. Boulder, CO: Westview.
63. Wyszomirski, M. J. 1997. Through the policy window: The context of cultural policy. Arts Education Policy Review 98 (5): 9-12.
64. Zeigler, J. W. 1994. Arts in crisis: The National Endowment for the Arts versus America. Chicago: Chicago Review Press, A Capella.