CT Colonography Computer-Aided Polyp Detection. Effect on Radiologist Observers of Polyp Identification by CAD on Both the Supine and Prone Scans

Academic Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 948-959

  Summers Ronald M , R M ^a   Liu, Jiamin ^a   Rehani, Bhavya ^a   Stafford, Phillip ^a   Brown, Linda ^a   Louie, Adeline ^a   Barlow, Duncan S ^b   Jensen, Donald W ^b   Cash, Brooks ^b   Choi, J Richard ^b   Pickhardt, Perry J ^c   Petrick, Nicholas ^d  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated detection; Colon; Colon cancer; CT; Image processing; Observer performance; Virtual imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BODY POSTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPINE POSITION;

AGED; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVATION; PHYSICIANS; PRONE POSITION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPINE POSITION;

EID: 77954190892     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.03.024     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Yoshida H., Dachman A.H. Computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2004, 25:419-431.
2. Halligan S., Altman D.G., Mallett S., et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 2006, 131:1690-1699.
3. Baker M.E., Bogoni L., Obuchowski N.A., et al. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings. Radiology 2007, 245:140-149.
4. Taylor S.A., Charman S.C., Lefere P., et al. CT Colonography (CTC): investigation of the Optimum Reader Paradigm Using Computer Aided Detection Software. Radiology 2008, 246:463-471.
5. Petrick N., Haider M., Summers R.M., et al. CT colonography and computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Radiology 2008, 246:148-156.
6. Mang T., Peloschek P., Plank C., et al. Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2007, 17:2598-2607.
7. Chen S.C., Lu D.S., Hecht J.R., et al. CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999, 172:595-599.
8. Fletcher J.G., Johnson C.D., MacCarty R.L., Welch T.J., Reed J.E., Ahlquist D.A. CT colonography in 180 patients: the benefit of prone imaging. Gastroenterology 1999, 116:G1770.
9. Yong A.A., Harris J.E., Shorvon P.J. The value of prone imaging in CT pneumocolon. Clin Radiol 2000, 55:959-963.
10. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003, 349:2191-2200.
11. Summers R.M., Yao J., Pickhardt P.J., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2005, 129:1832-1844.
12. Summers R.M., Jerebko A.K., Franaszek M., et al. Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 2002, 225:391-399.
13. Jerebko A.K., Malley J.D., Franaszek M., et al. Support vector machines committee classification method for computer-aided polyp detection in CT colonography. Acad Radiol 2005, 12:479-486.
14. Li J., Huang A., Yao J., et al. Optimizing computer-aided colonic polyp detection for CT colonography by evolving the Pareto front. Med Phys 2009, 36:201-212.
15. Dorfman D.D., Berbaum K.S., Lenth R.V. Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic methodology: a bootstrap analysis. Acad Radiol 1995, 2:626-633.
16. Langsrud O. Fisher's exact test. Available at: http://www.langsrud.com/fisher.htm.
17. Siegel S., Castellan N.J. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences 1988, McGraw-Hill, New York. 2nd ed.
18. Mani A., Napel S., Paik D.S., et al. Computed tomography colonography-feasibility of computer-aided polyp detection in a " First reader" paradigm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004, 28:318-326.
19. Gur D., Bandos A.I., Cohen C.S., et al. The " laboratory" effect: comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations. Radiology 2008, 249:47-53.
20. Shiraishi J., Abe H., Engelmann R., et al. Effect of high sensitivity in a computerized scheme for detecting extremely subtle solitary pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs: observer performance study. Acad Radiol 2003, 10:1302-1311.
21. Obuchowski N.A. Sample size tables for receiver operating characteristic studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000, 175:603-608.
22. Zheng B., Leader J.K., Abrams G.S., et al. Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses. Med Phys 2006, 33:3135-3143.
23. Van Engeland S., Timp S., Karssemeijer N. Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views. Med Phys 2006, 33:3203-3212.
24. Sahiner B., Chan H.P., Hadjiiski L.M., et al. Joint two-view information for computerized detection of microcalcifications on mammograms. Med Phys 2006, 33:2574-2585.
25. Gupta S., Markey M.K. Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views. Med Phys 2005, 32:1598-1606.
26. Acar B., Napel S., Paik D.S., et al. Registration of supine and prone CT colonography data: Method and evaluation. Radiology 2001, 221. 332:332.
27. Nappi J., Okamura A., Frimmel H., et al. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography. Acad Radiol 2005, 12:695-707.
28. Huang A., Roy D., Franaszek M., et al. Teniae coli guided navigation and registration for virtual colonoscopy. Pro IEEE Visualization Conf 2005, 279-285.
29. Wang S, Van Uitert RL, Summers RM. Automated matching of supine and prone colonic polyps based on PCA and SVMs. In: Prog Biomed Optics Imaging Proceed SPIE 2008; 6915.
30. Huang A, Summers RM, Roy D. Synchronous navigation for CT colonography. In: Prog Biomed Optics Imaging Proceed SPIE 2006; 6143.
31. Zalis M.E., Barish M.A., Choi J.R., et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005, 236:3-9.