Understanding the lessons and limitations of conservation and development;Entendiendo las lecciones y limitaciones de la conservación y el desarrollo

Conservation Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 461-469

  Oldekop, Johan A ^a   Bebbington, Anthony J ^a   Brockington, Dan ^a   Preziosi, Richard F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Common pool resource management; Conservation; Development; Land tenure; Meta analysis; Population size; Social heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION STATUS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HETEROGENEITY; LAND TENURE; META-ANALYSIS; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; POPULATION SIZE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

AFRICA; ARTICLE; CENTRAL AMERICA; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POPULATION DENSITY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; SOCIOECONOMICS; SOUTH AMERICA; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

AFRICA; ASIA, SOUTHEASTERN; CENTRAL AMERICA; COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENT; OWNERSHIP; POPULATION DENSITY; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SOUTH AMERICA;

AFRICA; CENTRAL AMERICA; SOUTH AMERICA; SOUTH ASIA; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

EID: 77954170162     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01456.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adhikari, B., and J. C. Lovett. 2006. Institutions and collective action: does heterogeneity matter in community-based resource management? Journal of Development Studies 43:426-445.
2. Agrawal, A. 2001. Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development 29:1649-672.
3. Agrawal, A., and A. Chhatre. 2006. Explaining success on the commons: community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya. World Development 34:149-166.
4. Agrawal, A., and S. Goyal. 2001. Group size and collective action: thirdparty monitoring in common-pool resources. Comparative Political Studies 34:63-93.
5. Agrawal, A., and E. Ostrom. 2001. Collective action, property rights, and decentralisation in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics and Society 29:485-514.
6. Agrawal, A., and G. N. Yadama. 1997. How do local institutions mediate market and population pressures on resources? Forest Panchayats in Kumaon, India. Development and Change 28:435-465.
7. Balooni, K., V. Ballabh, and M. Inoue. 2007. Declining instituted collective management practices and forest quality in the central Himalayas. Economic and Political Weekly 21 April:1443-1452.
8. Banana, A. Y., and W. Gombya-Ssembajjwe. 2000. Successful forest management: the importance of security of tenure and rule enforcement in Ugandan forests. Pages 87-98 in C. Gibson, M. McKean, and E. Ostrom, editors People and forests: communities, institutions and the governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
9. Becker, C. D., and C. C. Gibson. 2000. The lack of institutional supply: why a strong local community in western Ecuador fails to protect its forest. Pages 135-162 in C. Gibson, M. McKean, and E. Ostrom, editors. People and forests: communities, institutions and the governance. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
10. Becker, C. D., and R. Leon. 2000. Indigenous institutions and forest condition: lessons from the Yuracare. Pages 163-191 in C. Gibson, M. McKean and E. Ostrom, editors. People and forests: communities, institutions and the governance. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
11. Brockington, D., and K. Schmidt-Soltau. 2004. The social and environmental impacts of wilderness and development. Oryx 38:140-142.
12. Brockington, D., R. Duffy, and J. Igoe. 2008. Nature unbound. Conservation, capitalism and the future of protected areas. Earthscan, London.
13. Brooks, J. S., M. A. Franzen, C. M. Holmes, M. N. Grote, and M. Burgerhoff Mulder. 2006. Testing hypotheses for the success of different conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 20:1528-1538.
14. Bruner, A. G., R. E. Gullison, R. E. Rice, and G. A. B. da Fonseca. 2001. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291:125-128.
15. DeFries, R., A. Hansen, A. C. Newton, and M. C. Hansen. 2005. Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the past twenty years. Ecological Applications 15:19-26.
16. Gautam, A. P., and G. P. Shivakoti. 2005. Conditions for successful local collective action in forestry: some evidence from the hills of Nepal. Society and Natural Resources 18:153-171.
17. Geist, H. J., and E. F, Lambin, 2002. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 52:143-150.
18. Gibson, C. C., J. T. Williams, and E. Ostrom. 2005. Local enforcement and better forests. World Development 33:273-284.
19. Hayes T. M. 2006. Parks, people, and forest protection: an institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Development 34:2064-2075.
20. Hutton, J., W. M. Adams, and J. C. Murombedzi. 2005. Back to the barriers? Changing narratives in biodiversity conservation. Forum for Development Studies NUPI 2005:341-370.
21. Jackson, W. J., R. M. Tamrakar, S. Hunt, and K. R. Shepherd. 1998. Land-use changes in two middle hills districts of Nepal. Mountain Research Development 18:193-212.
22. Johnson, C. 2001. Community formation and fisheries conservation in southern Thailand. Development and Change 32:951-974.
23. Johnson, K. A., and K. C. Nelson. 2004. Common property and conservation: the potential for effective communal forest management within a national park in Mexico. Human Ecology 32:703-733.
24. Kabir, M. E., and E. L. Webb. 2006. Saving a forest: the composition and structure of a deciduous forest under community management in northeast Thailand. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 54:239-260.
25. Kijtewachakul, N., G. P. Shivakoti, and E. L Webb. 2004. Forest health, collective behaviours, and management. Environmental Management 33:620-636.
26. Liu, J., et al. 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513-1516.
27. Mena, C. F., R. E Bilsborrow, and M. E. McClain. 2006. Socioeconomic drivers of deforestation in the northern Ecuadorian Amazon. Environmental Management 37:802-815.
28. Myers, N., R. A Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. da Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853-858.
29. Nagendra, H. 2002. Tenure forest conditions: community forestry in the Nepal Terai. Environmental Conservation 29:530-539.
30. Nagendra, H., M. Karmacharya, and B. Karna. 2005. Evaluating forest management in Nepal: views across space and time. Ecology and Society 10:24-40.
31. Nelson, F., and A. Agrawal. 2008. Patronage or participation? Community-based natural resource management reform in sub-Saharan Africa. Development and Change 39:557-585.
32. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
33. Ostrom, E. 1999. Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Sciences 2:493-535.
34. Ostrom, E., T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E. U. Weber. 2002. The drama of the commons, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
35. Pandit, B. H., and G. B. Thapa. 2003. A tragedy of non-timber forest resources in the mountain commons of Nepal. Environmental Conservation 30:283-292.
36. Paule Dalle, S., S. de Blois, J. Caballero, and T. Johns. 2006. Integrating analysis of local land-use regulations, cultural perception and land-use/land-cover data for assessing the success of communitybased conservation. Forest Ecology and Management 222:370-383.
37. Pimm, S. L., G. J. Russell, J. L. Gittleman, and T. M. Brooks. 1995. The future of biodiversity. Science 296:347-350.
38. Poteete, A. R., and E. Ostrom. 2004. Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: the role of institutions in forest management. Development and Change 35:435-461.
39. Poteete, A. R., and E. Ostrom. 2008. Fifteen years of empirical research on collective action in natural resource management: struggling to build large-n databases based on qualitative research. World Development 36:176-195.
40. Ragin, C. C. 1987. The comparative method, University of California Press, California.
41. Ragin, C. C., K. A. Drass, and S. Davey. 2006. Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.0. Tucson Arizona, Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
42. Rudel, T. K. 2005. Tropical forests: regional paths of destruction and regeneration in the late 20th century, Columbia University Press, New York.
43. Rudel, T. K. 2008. Meta-analysis of case studies: a method for studying regional and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 18:18-25.
44. Salafsky, N., H. Cauley, G. Balachander, B. Cordes, J. Parks, C. Margoluis, S. Bhatt, C. Encarnacíon, D. Russel, and R. Margoluis. 2001. A systematic test of an enterprise strategy for community-based biodiversity and conservation. Conservation Biology 15:1585-1595.
45. Sauer, J., and J. M. Abdallah. 2007. Forest diversity, tobacco production and resource management in Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics 9:421-439.
46. Somanathan, E., R. Prabhakar, and B. Singh Mehta. 2005. Does decentralization work? Forest conservation in the Himalaya. Bureau for Research and Economic Analysis of Development. Bureau for Research and Economic Analysis of Development Working Paper No. 096. Duke University Durham, North Carolina.
47. Sunderland, T. C. H., C. Ehringhaus, and B. M. Campbell. 2008. Conservation and development in tropical forest landscapes: a time to face the trade-offs? Environmental Conservation 34:276-279.
48. Terborgh, J. 2000. The fate of tropical forests: a matter of stewardship. Conservation Biology 14:1358-1361.
49. Tucker, C. M. 1999. Private versus common property forests: forest condition and tenure in a Honduran community. Human Ecology 27:201-230.
50. Tucker, C. M., J. C. Randolph, and E. J. Castellanos. 2007. Institutions, biophysical factors and history: an integrative analysis of private and common property forests in Guatemala and Honduras. Human Ecology 35:259-274.
51. Varughese, G., and E. Ostrom. 2001. The contested role of heterogeneity in collective action: some evidence from community forestry in Nepal. World Development 29:747-765.