Use of Habitats as Surrogates of Biodiversity for Efficient Coral Reef Conservation Planning in Pacific Ocean Islands;Uso de Hábitats como Sustitutos de la Biodiversidad para la Conservación Eficiente de Arrecifes de Coral

Conservation Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 541-552

  Dalleau, Mayeul ^a   Andréfouët, Serge ^a,h   Wabnitz, Colette C C ^b   Payri, Claude ^a   Wantiez, Laurent ^c   Pichon, Michel ^d   Friedman, Kim ^e,f   Vigliola, Laurent ^e,g   Benzoni, Francesca ^h  

^a INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (New Caledonia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LA NOUVELLE CALÉDONIE   (New Caledonia)

^d MUSEUM OF TROPICAL QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^e SECRETARIAT OF THE PACIFIC COMMUNITY   (New Caledonia)

^f DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION   (Australia)

^g IRD Centre de Bretagne   (France)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Accumulation curves; Biodiversity surrogacy; Marine protected area; Millennium coral reef mapping project; Remote sensing; Richness congruence; Wallis

Indexed keywords

ALGAL COMMUNITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CORAL REEF; ENDEMIC SPECIES; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT TYPE; MARINE PARK; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; REMOTE SENSING; SITE SELECTION; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ALGA; ANIMAL; ANTHOZOA; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FISH; INVERTEBRATE; METHODOLOGY; PACIFIC ISLANDS; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ALGAE; ANIMALS; ANTHOZOA; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; FISHES; INVERTEBRATES; PACIFIC ISLANDS; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

WALLIS AND FUTUNA; WALLIS ISLANDS;

ALGAE; ANTHOZOA; INVERTEBRATA; PISCES;

EID: 77954155611     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01394.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Altmoos, M., and K. Henle. 2007. Differences in characteristics of reserve network selection using population data versus habitat surrogates. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:113-135.
2. Andelman, S. J., and W. F. Fagan. 2000. Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97:5954-5959.
3. Andréfouët, S. 2008. Coral reef habitat mapping using remote sensing: a user vs producer perspective. Implications for research, management and capacity building. Journal of Spatial Science 53:113-129.
4. Andréfouët, S., and G. Dirberg. 2005. Cartographie et inventaire du système récifal de Wallis, Futuna et alofi par imagerie satellitaire Landsat 7 ETM+ et orthophotographies aériennes àhauterésolution spatiale. Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Centre de Nouméa, New-Caledonia, and Service de L'Environnement de Wallis et Futuna, Wallis and Futuna.
5. Andréfouët, S., et al. 2003. Multi-site evaluation of IKONOS data for classification of tropical coral reef environments. Remote Sensing of Environment 88:128-143.
6. Andréfouët, S., F. E Muller-Karger, J. A. Robinson, C. J. Kranenburg, D. Torres-Pulliza, S. A. Spraggins, and B. Murch. 2006. Global assessment of modern coral reef extent and diversity for regional science and management applications: a view from space. Proceedings of 10th International Coral Reef Symposium 1:1732-1745.
7. Balmford, A., and K. J. Gaston. 1999. Why biodiversity surveys are good value? Nature 398:204-205.
8. Beger, M., G. P. Jones, and P. L. Munday. 2003. Conservation of coral reef biodiversity: a comparison of reserve selection procedures for corals and fishes. Biological Conservation 111:53-62.
9. Beger, M., S. A. McKenna, and H. P. Possingham. 2007. Effectiveness of surrogate taxa in the design of coral reef reserve systems in the Indo-Pacific. Conservation Biology 21:1584-1593.
10. Bellwood, D. R., T. P. Hughes, C. Folke, and M. Nystrom. 2004. Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429:827-833.
11. Conservation on Biological Diversity (CBD). 2006. Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its eighth meeting (Decision VIII/15, Annex IV). Curitiba, Brazil. Available from http://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/COP-08dec-en.pdf (accessed September 2009).
12. Ferrier, S. 2002. Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? Systematic Biology 51:331-363.
13. Friedlander, A., J. Sladek Nowlis, J. A. Sanchez, R. Appeldoorn, P. Usseglio, C. McCormick, S. Bejarano, and A. Mitchell-Chui. 2003. Designing effective marine protected areas in Seaflower Biosphere Reserve, Colombia, based on biological and sociological information. Conservation Biology 17:1769-1784.
14. Garson, J., and S. Sarkar 2002. Surrogacy 1.1 manual. University of Texas Biodiversity and Biocultural Conservation Laboratory, Austin.
15. Kareiva, P. 2006. Conservation biology: beyond marine protected areas. Current Biology 16:R533-R535.
16. Kendall, M. G. 1938. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30:81-93.
17. Kremen, C. A., et al. 2008. Aligning conservation priorities across taxa in Madagascar with high-resolution planning tools. Science 320:222-226.
18. Kronen, M., E. Tardy, P. Boblin, L. Chapman, F. Lasi, K. Pakoa, L. Vigliola, K. Friedman, F. Magron, and S. Pinca. 2009. Wallis and Futuna country report: profiles and results from survey work at Vailala, Halalo, Leava and Vele (August to December 2005, and March 2006). Pacific Regional Oceanic and Coastal Fisheries Development Programme (PROCFish/C/CoFish). Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie: Secrétariat Général de la Communauté du Pacifique/Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Noumea, New Caledonia. Available from http://www.spc.int/coastfish/Sections/reef/PROCFish_Web/Countries/Countr yReports.aspx?CountryCode=WF (accessed September 2009).
19. Howard, P. C., P. Viskanic, T. R. B. Davenport, F. W. Kiyenyi, M. Baltzer, and C. J. Dickinson. 1998. Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394:472-475.
20. Lubchenco, J., S. R. Palumbi, S. D. Gaines, and S. Andelman. 2003. Plugging a hole in the ocean: The emerging science of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13:S3-S7.
21. Lund, M. P., and C. Rahbek. 2002. Cross taxon congruence in complementarity and conservation of temperate biodiversity. Animal Conservation 5:163-171.
22. Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27:209-220.
23. Margules, C. R., and R. L. Pressey. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243-253.
24. Mellin, C., S. Andréfouët, M. Kulbicki, M. Dalleau, and L. Vigliola. 2009. Remote sensing and fish-habitat relationships in coral reef ecosystems: review and pathways for systematic multi-scale hierarchical research. Marine Pollution Bulletin 58:11-19.
25. Mumby, P. J., K. Broad, D. R. Brumbaugh, C. P. Dahlgren, A. R. Harborne, A. Hastings, K. E. Holmes, C. V. Kappel, F. Micheli, and J. N. Sanchirico. 2008. Coral reef habitats as surrogates of species, ecological functions, and ecosystem services. Conservation Biology 22:941-951.
26. N'Yeurt, A. D. R., and C. E. Payri. 2004. A preliminary annotated checklist of the marine algae and seagrasses of the Wallis Islands (French Overseas Territory of Wallis and Futuna), South Pacific. Australian Systematic Botany 17:367-397.
27. Payri, C.E., M.Pichon, F.Benzoni, A.D.R.N'Yeurt, H.Verbruggen, and S. Andréfouët. 2002. Contribution àl'étudedelabiodiversité dans les récifs coralliens de Wallis: scléractiniaires et macrophytes. Rapport Atelier Marin Wallis. Institut de Recherche pour le Dévelopement, New Caledonia.
28. Roberts, C. M., et al. 2003. Application of ecological criteria in selecting marine reserves and developing reserve networks. Ecological Applications 13:S215-S228.
29. Rodrigues, A. S. L., and T. N. Brooks. 2007. Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: the effectiveness of surrogates. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 38:713-737.
30. Sale, P. F. 2008. Management of coral reefs: where we have gone wrong and what we can do about it. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56:805-809.
31. Sarkar, S., C. Pappas, J. Garson, A. Aggarwal, and S. Cameron. 2004. Place prioritization for biodiversity conservation using probabilistic surrogate distribution data. Diversity and Distributions 10:125-133.
32. Sarkar, S., J. Justus, T. Fuller, C. Kelley, J. Garson, and M. Mayfield. 2005. Effectiveness of environmental surrogates for the selection of conservation area networks. Conservation Biology 19:815-825.
33. Sarkar, S., et al. 2006. Biodiversity conservation planning tools: Present status and challenges for the future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31:123-159.
34. Stevens, T., and R. M. Connolly. 2004. Testing the utility of abiotic surrogates for marine habitat mapping at scales relevant to management. Biological Conservation 119:351-362.
35. Wabnitz, C. C. C., S. Andréfouët, D. Torres-Pulliza, F. E. Muller-Karger, and P. A. Kramer. 2008. Regional-scale seagrass habitat mapping in the Wider Caribbean region using Landsat sensors: applications to conservation and ecology. Remote Sensing of Environment 112:3455-3467.
36. Wabnitz, C. C. C., S. Andréfouët, and F. E. Muller-Karger. 2009. Measuring progress towards global marine conservation targets. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, doi: 10.1890/080109.
37. Ward, T. J., M. A. Vanderklift, A. O. Nicholls, and R. A. Kenchington. 1999. Selecting marine reserves using habitats and species assemblages as surrogates for biological diversity. Ecological Applications 9:691-698.
38. Williams, P. H., C. R. Margules, and D. W. Hilbert. 2002. Data requirements and data sources for biodiversity priority area selection. Journal of Biosciences 27:327-338.
39. Williams, J. T., L. Wantiez, C. Chauvet, R. Galzin, M. Harmelin-Vivien, E. Jobet, M. Juncker, G. Mou-Tham, S. Planes, and P. Sasal. 2006. Checklist of the shorefishes of Wallis Islands (Wallis and Futuna French Territories, south-central Pacific). Cybium 30:247-260.