Interspecific space partitioning during the foraging activity of two syntopic species of Messor harvester ants

Journal of Biological Research

Volumn 13, Issue , 2010, Pages 3-12

  Solida, Luigi ^a   Scalisi, Michele ^b   Fanfani, Alberto ^a   Mori, Alessandra ^c   Grasso, Donato A ^c  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b Ministero Istruzione Universitá e Ricerca   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Ellenberg bio indication model; Messor minor; Messor wasmanni; Spatial strategies; Syntopic species

Indexed keywords

FORMICIDAE; MESSOR; MESSOR MINOR; MESSOR WASMANNI;

EID: 77954147658     PISSN: 1790045X     EISSN: 1790045X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Acosta FJ, Lopez FL, Serrano JM, 1995. Dispersed versus central-place foraging: intra- and intercolonial competition in the strategy of trunk trail arrangement of a harvester ant. American naturalist, 145: 389-411.
2. Adams ES, 1998. Territory size and shape in fire ants: a model based on neighbourhood interactions. Ecology, 79: 1125-1134.
3. Adams ES, 2001. Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Annual review of ecology and systematics, 32: 277-303.
4. Adams ES, 2003. Experimental analysis of territory size in a population of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Behavioral ecology, 14: 48-53.
5. Adams ES, Tschinkel WR, 2001. Mechanisms of population regulation in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta: an experimental study. Journal of animal ecology, 70: 335-369.
6. Adler FR, Gordon DM, 2003. Optimization, conflict, and nonoverlapping foraging ranges in ants. American naturalist, 162: 529-543.
7. Baroni Urbani C, 1971. Catalogo delle specie di formiche d'Italia. Memorie della societd entomologica italiana, 50: 1-287.
8. Baroni Urbani C, 1991. Evolutionary aspects of foraging efficiency and niche shift in two sympatric seed-harvesting ants (Messor) (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Ethology, ecology & evolution, 1: 75-79.
9. Bernard F, 1968. Les fourmis. Masson et Cie Editerurs, Paris.
10. Bernstein RA, Gobbel M, 1979. Partitioning of space in communities of ants. Journal of animal ecology, 48: 931-942.
11. Both C, Visser ME, 2003. Density dependence, territoriali-ty, and divisibility of resources: from optimality models to population processes. American naturalist, 161: 326-336.
12. Brown MJF, 1999. Nest relocation and encounters between colonies of the seed-harvesting ant Messor Andrei. In-sectes sociaux, 46: 66-70.
13. Brown MJF, Gordon DM, 2000. How resources and encounters affect the distribution of foraging activity in a seed-harvesting ant. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 47: 195-203.
14. Cerdá X, 2001. Behavioural and physiological traits to thermal stress tolerance in two Spanish desert ants. Etologia, 9: 15-27.
15. Cerdá X, Retana J, Cros S, 1997. Thermal disruption of transitive hierarchies in Mediterranean ant communities. Journal of animal ecology, 66: 363-374.
16. Cerdá X, Dahbi A, Retana J, 2002. Spatial patterns, temporal variability, and the role of multi-nest colonies in a monogynous Spanish desert ant. Ecological entomology, 27: 7-15.
17. Clark PJ, Evans FC, 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in population. Ecology, 35: 445-453.
18. Cushman JH, Martinsen GD, Mazeroll AI, 1988. Density-and size-dependent spacing of ant nests: evidence for intraspecific competition. Oecologia, 77: 522-525.
19. Czechowski W, 1975. Bionomics of Formica (Coptoformi-ca) pressilabris. Annales zoologici, 33: 273-285.
20. Davidson DW, 1977. Foraging ecology and community organization in desert seed-eating ants. Ecology, 58: 725-737.
21. Detrain C, Pasteels JM, 2000. Seed preferences of the harvester ant Messor barbarus in a Mediterranean mosaic grassland. Sociobiology, 35: 35-48.
22. Dietrich B, Wehner R, 2003. Sympatry and allopatry in two desert ant sister species: how do Cataglyphis bicolor and C. savignyi coexist? Oecologia, 136: 63-72.
23. Donnelly K, 1978. Simulations to determine the variance and edge-effect of total nearest neighbour distance. In: Hodder I, ed. Simulation studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press: 91-95.
24. Ellenberg H, 1979. Zeigerwerte der Gefäßpflanzen Mitte-leuropas (Indicator values of vascular plants in Central Europe). Scripta geobotanica, 9: 1-122.
25. Ewald J, 2003. The sensitivity of Ellenberg indicator values to the completeness of vegetation relevés. Basic applied ecology, 4: 507-513.
26. Fanelli G, 1998. Dasypyrum villosum vegetation in the territory of Rome. Atti accademia nazionale Lincei, rendi-conti scienze fisiche é naturali, 9: 155-176.
27. Fanfani A, Nardi G, Folletto A, Tinelli A, 2006. Elenco (checklist) degli organismi segnalati nella Tenuta Pre-sidenziale di Castelporziano. In: Scarascia Mugnoz-za GT, ed. Il Sistema Ambientale della Tenuta Presi-denziale di Castelporziano. Accademia delle Scienze, Scritti e Documenti XXXVII, 3: 1607-1842.
28. Fisher JB, 1954. Evolution and bird sociality. In: Huxley J, Hardy AC, Ford EB, eds. Evolution as a process. Allen & Unwin, London: 71-83.
29. Gordon DM, 1984. The harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex ba-dius) midden: refuse or boundary? Ecological entomology, 9: 403-412.
30. Gordon DM, 1989. Ants distinguish neighbors from strangers. Oecologia, 81: 198-200.
31. Gordon DM, 1991. Behavioral flexibility and the foraging ecology of seed-eating ants. American naturalist, 138: 379-411.
32. Gordon DM, 1992. How colony growth affects forager intrusion between neighboring harvester ant colonies. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 31: 417-427.
33. Gordon DM, 1995. The development of ant colony's foraging range. Animal behaviour, 49: 649-659.
34. Gordon DM, 2002. The regulation of foraging activity in red harvester ant colonies. American naturalist, 159: 509-518.
35. Gordon DM, Kulig AW, 1996. Founding, foraging, and fighting: colony size and the spatial distribution of harvester ant nests. Ecology, 77: 2393-2409.
36. Grasso DA, Mori A, Le Moli F, 1999. Recruitment and trail communication in two species of Messor ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Italian journal of zoology, 66: 373-378.
37. Grasso DA, Mori A, Le Moli F, 2000. The use of anal spots for nest-area marking in Messor ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect social life, 3: 61-66.
38. Grasso DA, Mori A, Giovannotti M, Le Moli F, 2004. Interspecific interference behaviours by workers of the harvesting ant Messor capitatus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ethology, ecology & evolution, 16: 197-207.
39. Grasso DA, Sledge MF, Le Moli F, Mori A, Turillazzi S, 2005. Nest-area marking with faeces: a chemical signature that allows colony-level recognition in seed harvesting ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insectes sociaux, 52: 36-44.
40. Harkness RD, Isham V, 1988. Relations between nests of Messor wasmanni in Greece. Insectes sociaux, 35: 1-18.
41. Harrison JS, Gentry JB, 1981. Foraging pattern, colony distribution, and foraging range of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. Ecology, 62: 1467-1473.
42. Hölldobler B, 1976. Recruitment behavior, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 1: 3-44.
43. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO, 1990. The Ants. Belknap Press, Cambrige, MA.
44. Johnson RA, 2000. Habitat segregation based on soil texture and body size in the seed-harvester ants Pogono-myrmex rugosus and P. barbatus. Ecological entomology, 25: 403-412.
45. Krebs JR, Davies NB, 1984. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Second edition. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England.
46. Langen TA, Tripet F, Nonacs P, 2000. The red ant the black: habituation and the dear-enemy phenomenon in two desert Pheidole ants. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 48: 285-292.
47. Levings S, Traniello JFA, 1981. Territoriality, nest dispersion, and community structure in ants. Psyche, 88: 265-319.
48. López F, Acosta FJ, Serrano JM, 1993. Responses of the trunk routes of a harvester ant to plant density. Oecologia, 93: 109-113.
49. López F, Acosta FJ, Serrano JM, 1994. Guerrilla vs. phalanx strategies of resource capture: growth and structural plasticity in the trunk trail system of the harvester ant Messor barbarus. Journal of animal ecology, 63: 127-138.
50. Morehead SA, Feener DH Jr, 1998. Foraging behavior and morphology: seed selection in the harvester ant genus, Pogonomyrmex. Oecologia, 114: 548-555.
51. Morrell LJ, Kokko H, 2003. Adaptive strategies of territory formation. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 54: 385-395.
52. Morrell LJ, Kokko H, 2005. Bridging the gap between mechanistic and adaptive explanations of territory formation. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 57: 381-390.
53. Pignatti S, Bianco PM, Fanelli G, Guarino R, Petersen J, Tescarollo P, 2001. Reliability and effectiveness of Ellenberg's indices in checking flora and vegetation changes induced by climatic variations. In: Walter JR, Burga CA, Edwards PJ, eds. Fingerprints of climate changes: adapted behaviour and shifting species ranges. Kluwer Accademy/Plenum Publishers, New York and London: 281-304.
54. Pinzari F, Trinchera A, Benedetti A, Sequi P, 2001. Defining soil quality in Mediterranean forest systems: mi-crobial biomass activity. In: Scarascia Mugnozza GT, ed. Il Sistema Ambientale della Tenuta Presidenziale di Castelporziano. Accademia Nazionale delle Scienze, Scritti e Documenti XXVI, 1: 45-58.
55. Pirk GI, Lopez de Casenave J, 2006. Diet and seed removal rates by the harvester ants Pogonomyrmex rastratus and Pogonomyrmex pronotalis in the central Monte desert, Argentina. Insectes sociaux, 53: 119-125.
56. Poldi B, Mei M, Rigato F, 1994. Hymenoptera Formicidae. In: Minelli A, Ruffo S, La Poesta S, eds. Checklist delle specie della fauna italiana. Calderini, Bologna: 1-10.
57. Pulliam HR, Brand MR, 1975. The production and utilization of seeds in plains grassland of southeaster Arizona. Ecology, 56: 1158-1166.
58. Rissing SW, Wheeler J, 1976. Foraging responses of Vero-messor pergandei to change in seed production. Pan-Pacific entomologist, 52: 63-72.
59. Ryti RT, Case TJ, 1986. Overdispersion of ant colonies: a test of hypotheses. Oecologia, 69: 446-453.
60. Savolainen R, Vepsäläinen K, 1988. A competition hierarchy among boreal ants: impact on resource partitioning and community structure. Oikos, 51: 135-155.
61. Schoener TW, 1974. Resources partitioning in ecological communities. Science, 185: 27-39.
62. Smith AT, Dobson SF, 1994. A technique for evaluation of spatial data using asymmetrical weighted overlap values. Animal behaviour, 48: 1285-1292.
63. Solida L, Grasso DA, Celant A, Fanfani A, Mori A, Le Moli F, 2007. Foraging activity in two species of Mes-sor harvester ants: preliminary data on size-matching and diet breadth. Redia, 90: 71-73.
64. Stamps JA, Krishnan VV, 2001. How territorial animals compete for divisible space: a learning-based model with unequal competitiors. American naturalist, 157: 154-169.
65. Traniello JFA, Robson SK, 1995. Trail and territorial communication in social insects. In: Cardé RT, Bell WJ, eds. Chemical Ecology of Insects 2. Chapman & Hall, New York: 241-286.
66. Tschinkel WR, 1993. Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta during one annual cycle. Ecological monographs, 63: 425-457.
67. Tschinkel WR, Adams ES, Macom T, 1995. Territory area and colony size in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Journal of animal ecology, 64: 473-480.
68. Willott SJ, Compton SG, Incoll LD, 2000. Foraging, food selection and worker size in the seed harvesting ant Messor bouvieri. Oecologia, 125: 35-44.