Effects of aging parameters on formability of 6061-O alloy

Materials and Design

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 4847-4852

  Ozturk, Fahrettin ^a   Esener, Emre ^a   Toros, Serkan ^a   Picu, Catalin R ^b  

^a NIGDE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGING PARAMETER; AGING TIME; AL-MG-SI; ALUMINUM-MAGNESIUM; AUTOMOTIVE BODY; EXPANSION TESTS; R VALUE; TEXTURE DIRECTION; YIELD SURFACE;

AGE HARDENING; MAGNESIUM; MATERIALS PROPERTIES; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES;

SILICON ALLOYS;

EID: 77954145721     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.050     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Murtha S.J. New 6XXX aluminum alloy for automotive body sheet applications. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 1995, 104:657-666.
2. Parson NC, Yiu HL. Light metals. In: Campbell PG, editor. PA, USA, Warrendale TMS; 1989. p. 713-24.
3. Buha J., Lumley R.N., Crosky A.G. Microstructural development and mechanical properties of interrupted aged Al-Mg-Si-Cu alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 2006, 37A:3119-3130.
4. 2Si precipitation in an Al-Mg-Si alloy by small angle neutron scattering. J Nucl Mater 1985, 135:181-189.
5. Buha J., Lumley R.N., Crosky A.G., Hono K. Secondary precipitation in an Al-Mg-Si-Cu alloy. Acta Mater 2007, 55:3015-3024.
6. Marioara C.D., Nordmark H., Andersen S.J., Holmestad R. Post-β″ phases and their influence on microstructure ad hardness in 6xxx Al-Mg-Si alloys. J Mater Sci 2006, 41:471-478.
7. Edwards G.A., Stiller K., Dunlop G.L., Couper M.J. The precipitation sequence in Al-Mg-Si alloys. Acta Mater 1998, 46:3893-3904.
8. Burger G.B., Gupta A.K., Jeffrey P.W., Llyod D.J. Microstructural control of aluminum sheet used in automotive applications. Mater Charact 1995, 35:23-39.
9. Demir H., Gunduz S. The effects of aging on machinability of 6061 aluminum alloy. Mater Des 2009, 30:1480-1483.
10. Kim H.H., Cho S.H., Kang C.G. Evaluation of microstructure and mechanical properties by using nano/micro-indentation and nanoscratch during aging treatment of rheo-forged Al 6061 alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 2008, 485:272-281.
11. de Haas M., van Scherpenzeel S.M., de Hosson J.T.M. Grain boundary segregation and precipitation in Al alloy AA6061. Mater Sci Forum 2006, 519-21(1):467-472.
12. Doward R.C., Bouvier C. A rationalization of factors affecting strength, ductility and toughness of AA6061-type Al-Mg-Si-(Cu) alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 1998, 254:33-44.
13. Taylor B. Formability testing of sheet metals. In: metals handbook, 9th ed., vol 14; 1988. p. 877-99.
14. Hill R. Constitutive modelling of orthotropic plasticity in sheet metals. J Mech Phys Solid 1990, 38:405-417.
15. Barlat F., Lian J. Plastic behavior and stretchability of sheet metals. Part I. A yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions. Int J Plast 1989, 5:51-66.
16. Picu R.C., Vincze G., Gracio J.J., Barlat F. Effect of solute distribution on the strain rate sensitivity of solid solutions. Scripta Mater 2006, 54:71-75.
17. Chan K.C., Tong G.Q. Strain rate sensitivity of a high-strain-rate superplastic Al6061/20SiCw composite under uniaxial and equibiaxial tension. Mater Lett 2001, 51:389-395.
18. Logan RW. Implications of a " cross-rolled" yield surface approximation on deep drawing, In: NUMISHEET 96, Dearborn, MI, September 29; 1996.
19. Logan RW. Use of non-quadratic yield surfaces in design of optimal deep-draw blank geometry. In: SAE international congress and Expo Detroit, MI, February 26-29; 1996.
20. Geng L., Wagoner R.H. Role of plastic anisotropy and its evolution on springback. Int J Mech Sci 2002, 44:123-148.