Minimal curvature trajectories: Riemannian geometry concepts for slow manifold computation in chemical kinetics

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 229, Issue 18, 2010, Pages 6512-6533

  Lebiedz, Dirk ^a,b   Reinhardt, Volkmar ^b,c   Siehr, Jochen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c SEW EURODRIVE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Chemical kinetics; Curvature; Model reduction; Nonlinear optimization; Riemannian geometry; Slow invariant manifold

Indexed keywords

CURVE FITTING; GEOMETRY; KINETICS; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; TIME MEASUREMENT;

CURVATURE; DIFFERENT TIME SCALE; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION SYSTEMS; FAST MODE; MODEL REDUCTION; NON-LINEAR OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMIZATION CRITERIA; RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY; SLOW INVARIANT MANIFOLDS; SLOW MANIFOLDS;

TRAJECTORIES;

EID: 77954145214     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Warnatz J., Maas U., Dibble R.W. Combustion: Physical and Chemical Fundamentals, Modeling and Simulation, Experiments, Pollutant Formation 2006, Springer, Berlin.
2. Lebiedz D., Kammerer J., Brandt-Pollmann U. Automatic network coupling analysis for dynamical systems based on detailed kinetic models. Phys. Rev. E 2005, 72:041911.
3. Gorban A.N., Karlin I.V. Invariant Manifolds for Physical and Chemical Kinetics. Lecture Notes in Physics 2005, vol. 660. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
4. Maas U., Pope S.B. Simplifying chemical kinetics: intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space. Combust. Flame 1992, 88:239-264.
5. Bykov V., Gol'dshtein V., Maas U. Simple global reduction technique based on decomposition approach. Combust. Theor. Model. 2008, 12(2):389-405.
6. Lam S. Singular perturbation for stiff equations using numerical methods. Recent Advances in the Aerospace Sciences 1985, 3-20. Plenum Press, New York and London.
7. Lam S.H., Goussis D.A. The CSP method for simplifying kinetics. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1994, 26:461-486.
8. Davis M.J., Skodje R.T. Geometric investigation of low-dimensional manifolds in systems approaching equilibrium. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111:859-874.
9. Fraser S.J. The steady state and equilibrium approximations: a geometrical picture. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88:4732-4738.
10. Nguyen A.H., Fraser S.J. Geometrical picture of reaction in enzyme kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 91:186-193.
11. Chiavazzo E., Gorban A.N., Karlin I.V. Comparison of invariant manifolds for model reduction in chemical kinetics. Commun. Comput. Phys. 2007, 2(5):964-992.
12. Gorban A., Karlin I., Zinovyev A. Invariant grids: method of complexity reduction in reaction networks. Complexus 2005, 2:110-127.
13. Gear C.W., Kaper T.J., Kevrekidis I.G., Zagaris A. Projecting to a slow manifold: singularly perturbed systems and legacy codes. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 2005, 4(3):711-732.
14. Zagaris A., Gear C.W., Kaper T.J., Kevrekidis Y.G. Analysis of the accuracy and convergence of equation-free projection to a slow manifold. ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 2009, 43(4):757-784.
15. Keck J.C., Gillespie D. Rate-controlled partial-equilibrium method for treating reacting gas mixtures. Combust. Flame 1971, 17:237-241.
16. Z. Ren, S. Pope, Species reconstruction using pre-image curves, in: Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 30, 2005, pp. 1293-1300.
17. Ren Z., Pope S.B., Vladimirsky A., Guckenheimer J.M. The invariant constrained equilibrium edge preimage curve method for the dimension reduction of chemical kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124:114111.
18. S. Delhaye, L.M.T. Somers, J.A. van Oijen, L.P.H. de Goey, Simulating transient effects of laminar diffusion flames using flamelet libraries, in: Proceedings of the Third European Combustion Meeting, ECM, 2007.
19. van Oijen J.A., de Goey L.P.H. Modelling of premixed laminar flames using flamelet-generated manifolds. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2000, 161:113-137.
20. Mease K.D., Bharadwaj S., Iravanchy S. Timescale analysis for nonlinear dynamical systems. J. Guidance, Control Dyn. 2003, 26(2):318-330.
21. Mitsos A., Oxberry G.M., Barton P.I., Green W.H. Optimal automatic reaction and species elimination in kinetic mechanisms. Combust. Flame 2008, 155(1-2):118-132.
22. Al-Khateeb A.N., Powers J.M., Paolucci S., Sommese A.J., Diller J.A., Hauenstein J.D., Mengers J.D. One-dimensional slow invariant manifolds for spatially homogenous reactive systems. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131(2):024118.
23. Gear C.W., Kevrekidis I.G. Constraint-defined manifolds: a legacy code approach to low-dimensional computation. J. Sci. Comput. 2005, 25(1/2):17-28.
24. Adrover A., Creta F., Giona M., Valorani M. Stretching-based diagnostics and reduction of chemical kinetic models with diffusion. J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 225:1442-1471.
25. Lebiedz D. Computing minimal entropy production trajectories: an approach to model reduction in chemical kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120(15):6890-6897.
26. Lebiedz D., Reinhardt V., Kammerer J. Novel trajectory based concepts for model and complexity reduction in (bio)chemical kinetics. Model Reduction and Coarse-graining Approaches for Multi-scale Phenomena 2006, 343-364. Springer, Berlin. A.N. Gorban, N. Kazantzis, I.G. Kevrekidis, C. Theodoropoulos (Eds.).
27. Reinhardt V., Winckler M., Lebiedz D. Approximation of slow attracting manifolds in chemical kinetics by trajectory-based optimization approaches. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112(8):1712-1718.
28. Goldstein H. Classical Mechanics 1980, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. second ed.
29. Kondepudi D., Prigogine I. Modern Thermodynamics 1998, WILEY-VCH Verlag, GmbH, Weinheim.
30. Gorban A.N., Karlin I.V., Zinovyev A.Y. Constructive methods of invariant manifolds for kinetic problems. Phys. Rep. 2004, 396:197-403.
31. Valorani M., Najm H.N., Goussis D.A. CSP analysis of a transient flame-vortex interaction: time scales and manifolds. Combust. Flame 2003, 134(1-2):35-53.
32. Shaik O.S., Kammerer J., Gorecki J., Lebiedz D. Derivation of a quantitative minimal model from a detailed elementary-step mechanism supported by mathematical coupling analysis. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123:234103.
33. Powell M. A fast algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization calculations. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1978, vol. 630:144-157. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. A. Dold, B. Eckmann (Eds.).
34. Bock H.G. Randwertproblemmethoden zur Parameteridentifizierung in Systemen nichtlinearer Differentialgleichungen. Bonner Mathematische Schriften 1987, vol. 183. University of Bonn.
35. H.G. Bock, K.J. Plitt, A multiple shooting algorithm for direct solution of optimal control problems, in: Proceedings of the Ninth IFAC World Congress, Budapest, Pergamon, Oxford, 1984.
36. J. Nocedal, S.J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering, second ed., Springer, New York, 2006.
37. Bock H.G. Numerical treatment of inverse problems in chemical reaction kinetics. Springer Series in Chemical Physics 1981, vol. 18:102-125. Springer, Heidelberg. K.H. Ebert, P. Deuflhard, W. Jäger (Eds.).
38. J. Albersmeyer, H. Bock, Sensitivity generation in an adaptive BDF-method, in: H. Bock, E. Kostina, X. Phu, R. Rannacher (Eds.), Modeling, Simulation and Optimization of Complex Processes: Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Scientific Computing, March 6-10, 2006, Hanoi, Vietnam, Springer, 2008, pp. 15-24.
39. Bauer I., Finocchi F., Duschl W.J., Gail H.-P., Schlöder J.P. Simulation of chemical reactions and dust destruction in protoplanetary accretion disks. Astron. Astrophys. 1997, 317:273-289.
40. Leineweber D.B., Bauer I., Bock H.G., Schlöder J.P. An efficient multiple shooting based reduced SQP strategy for large-scale dynamic process optimization. Part I: theoretical aspects. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2003, 27:157-166.
41. Leineweber D.B., Schäfer A., Bock H.G., Schlöder J.P. An efficient multiple shooting based reduced SQP strategy for large-scale dynamic process optimization. Part II: Software aspects and applications. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2003, 27:167-174.
42. Diehl M., Bock H.G., Schlöder J.P. A real-time iteration scheme for nonlinear optimization in optimal feedback control. SIAM J. Contr. Opt. 2005, 43(5):1714-1736.
43. Diehl M., Bock H.G., Schlöder J.P., Findeisen R., Nagy Z., Allgöwer F. Real-time optimization and nonlinear model predictive control of processes governed by differential-algebraic equations. J. Process. Contr. 2002, 12(4):577-585.
44. Einstein A. Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Ann. Phys. Leipzig 1916, 49:769-822.
45. Weinhold F. Metric geometry of equilibrium thermodynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 63(6):2479-2483.
46. S. Shahshahani, A new mathematical framework for the study of linkage and selection, Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 17 (211).
47. Bloch E.D. A First Course in Geometric Topology and Differential Geometry 1997, Birkhäuser, Boston.
48. do Carmo M.P. Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces 1976, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
49. Kühnel W. Differential Geometry 2006, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
50. J. Stoer, R. Bulirsch, Introduction to Numerical Analysis, Texts in Applied Mathematics, vol. 12, third ed., Springer, New York, 2002.
51. Squire W., Trapp G. Using complex variables to estimate derivatives of real functions. SIAM Rev. 1998, 40(1):110-112.
52. Singh S., Powers J.M., Paolucci S. On slow manifolds of chemically reactive systems. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117(4):1482-1496.
53. Chiavazzo E., Karlin I.V. Quasi-equilibrium grid algorithm: geometric construction for model reduction. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227(11):5535-5560.
54. Maas U., Warnatz J. Simulation of thermal ignition processes in two-dimensional geometries. Z. Phys. Chem. N.F. 1989, 161:61-81.
55. Brad R.B., Tomlin A.S., Fairweather M., Griffiths J.F. The application of chemical reduction methods to a combustion system exhibiting complex dynamics. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2007, 31:455-463.