Absolute pitch in boreal chickadees and humans: Exceptions that test a phylogenetic rule

Learning and Motivation

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 156-173

  Weisman, Ronald G ^a   Balkwill, Laura Lee ^a   Hoeschele, Marisa ^b   Moscicki, Michele K ^b   Bloomfield, Laurie L ^b   Sturdy, Christopher B ^b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Absolute pitch; Animals; Boreal chickadees; Frequency range; Humans; Music; Pitch chroma; Pitch height; Songbirds

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954143146     PISSN: 00239690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2010.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Athos E.A., Levinson B., Kisler A., Zemansky J., Bostrom A., Freimer N., et al. Dichotomy and perceptual distortions in absolute pitch ability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104:14795-14800.
2. Bakan R.J. Clinical measurement of speech and voice 1987, Little, Brown, New York.
3. Conover W.J., Iman R.L. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. American Statistician 1981, 35:124-129.
4. Cynx J., Nottebohm F. Role of gender, season, and familiarity in discrimination of conspecific song by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 1992, 89:1368-1371.
5. Cynx J. Auditory frequency generalization and a failure to find octave generalization in a songbird, the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology 1993, 107:140-146.
6. Dabelsteen T, Pedersen S.B. Correspondence between messages in the full song of the blackbird (Turdus merula) and meanings to territorial males, as inferred from responses to computerized modifications of natural song. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 1985, 69:149-165.
7. Emlen S.T. An experimental analysis of the parameters of bird song eliciting species recognition. Behaviour 1972, 41:130-171.
8. Emmerich D.S., Ellermeier W., Butensky B. A re-examination of the frequency discrimination of random-amplitude tones, and a test of Henning's modified energy-detector model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1989, 85:1653-1659.
9. Falls J.B. Properties of bird song eliciting responses from territorial males. Proceedings of the XIII International Ornithological Congress 1963, 13:259-271.
10. Farabaugh S.M., Linzenbold A., Dooling R.J. Vocal plasticity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): Evidence for social factors in the learning of contact calls. Journal of Comparative Psychology 1994, 108:81-92.
11. Hailman J.P. The organization of major vocalizations in the Paridae. Wilson Bulletin 1989, 101:305-343.
12. Hulse S.H., Cynx J. Relative pitch perception is constrained by absolute pitch in songbirds (Mimus, Molothrus, and Sturnus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 1985, 99:176-196.
13. Huron D., Kinney D., Precoda K. Influence of pitch height on the perception of submissiveness and threat in musical passages. Empirical Musicology Review 2006, 1:170-177.
14. Lee T.T.Y., Charrier I., Bloomfield L.L., Weisman R.G., Sturdy C.B. Frequency-range discriminations and absolute pitch in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus), mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli), and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Journal of Comparative Psychology 2006, 120:217-228.
15. Levitin D.J., Rogers S.E. Absolute pitch: Perception, coding, and controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 3:26-33.
16. Levitin D.J., Zatorre R.J. On the nature of early music training and absolute pitch: A reply to Brown, Sachs, Cammuso, and Folstein. Music Perception 2003, 21:105-110.
17. Lohr B., Weisman R., Nowicki S. The role of pitch cues in song recognition by Carolina chickadees (Parus carolinensis). Behaviour 1994, 130:1-15.
18. MacDougall-Shackleton S.A., Hulse S.H. Concurrent absolute and relative pitch processing by european starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology 1996, 110:139-146.
19. Mercado E., Orduña I., Nowak J.M. Auditory categorization of complex sounds by rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 2005, 119:90-98.
20. Moore B.C.J. An introduction to the psychology of hearing 1989, Academic Press, London. 3rd ed.
21. Morton E. Sound symbolism and its role in non-human vertebrate communication. Sound symbolism 1994, 348-365. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. L. Hinton, J. Nichols, J. Ohala (Eds.).
22. Nelson D.A. Feature weighting in species song recognition by the field sparrow Spizella pusilla. Behaviour 1988, 106:158-181.
23. Nelson D.A. The importance of invariant and distinctive features in species recognition of bird song. Condor 1989, 91:120-130.
24. Nelson D.A. Song frequency as a cue for recognition of species and individuals in the field sparrow Spizella pusilla. Journal of Comparative Psychology 1989, 103:171-176.
25. Njegovan M., Hillhorst B., Ferguson S., Weisman R. A motor driven feeder for operant training in song birds. Behaviour, Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 1994, 26:26-27.
26. Nowicki S., Mitani J.C., Nelson D.A., Marler P. The communicative significance of tonality in birdsongs: Responses to songs produced in helium. Bioacoustics 1989, 2:35-46.
27. Page S.C., Hulse S.H., Cynx J. Relative pitch perception in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): Further evidence for an elusive phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1989, 15:137-146.
28. Phillmore L., Sturdy C.B., Weisman R. Does reduced social contact affect discrimination of distance cues and individual vocalizations?. Animal Behaviour 2003, 65:911-922.
29. Popper K. Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach 1979, Oxford University Press, London. revised ed.
30. Puts D.A., Hodges C., Cárdenas R., Gaulin S.J. Men's voices as dominance signals: Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evolution and Human Behavior 2007, 28:340-344.
31. Shepard R.N. Geometrical approximations of the structure of musical pitch. Psychological Review 1982, 89:305-333.
32. Takeuchi A.H., Hulse S.H. Absolute pitch. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 113:345-361.
33. Thompson W.L. Song recognition by territorial male Buntings (Passerina). Animal Behaviour 1969, 17:658-663.
34. Tinbergen N. On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 1965, 20:410-433.
35. Ward W.D., Burns E.M. Absolute pitch. The psychology of music 1982, 431-451. Academic Press, New York. D. Deutsch (Ed.).
36. Weary D.M., Lemon R.E., Date E.M. Acoustic features used in song discrimination by the veery. Ethology 1986, 72:199-213.
37. Weisman R.G., Ratcliffe L. Absolute and relative pitch processing in black-capped chickadees, Parus atricapillus. Animal Behaviour 1989, 38:685-692.
38. Weisman R., Njegovan M., Sturdy C.B., Phillmore L., Coyle J., Mewhort D. Frequency range discriminations: Special and general abilities in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology 1998, 112:244-258.
39. Weisman R.G., Njegovan M., Williams M.T., Cohen J., Sturdy C.B. A behavior analysis of absolute pitch perception. Behavioral Processes 2004, 66:289-307.
40. Weisman R.G., Williams M.T., Cohen J.S., Njegovan M.G., Sturdy C.B. The comparative psychology of absolute pitch. Comparative cognition: Experimental explorations of animal intelligence 2006, 71-86. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. T. Zentall, E. Wasserman (Eds.).
41. Wright A.A., Rivera J.J., Hulse S.H., Shyan M., Neiworth J.J. Music perception and octave generalization in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:291-307.
42. Wunderle J.M. Components of song used for species recognition in the common yellowthroat. Animal Behaviour 1979, 27:982-996.
43. Zatorre R.J. Absolute pitch: A model for understanding the influence of genes and development on neural and cognitive function. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:692-695.