Incorporating local knowledge(s) in health promotion

Critical Public Health

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 211-222

  Smith, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Accountability; Governance; Health promotion; Local knowledge; Participation; Performance measurement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COOPERATION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTUITION; KNOWLEDGE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; RESPONSIBILITY;

EID: 77954136412     PISSN: 09581596     EISSN: 14693682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09581590902906187     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abele, F., 2007. Between respect and control: traditional indigenous knowledge in Canadian public policy. In: M. Orsini and M. Smith, eds. Critical Policy Studies. Vancouver: UBC Press, 233-256.
2. Battiste, M. and Youngblood Henderson, J., 2000. Protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage: a global challenge. Saskatoon: Purich Publishing.
3. Baum, F.E., 1993. Healthy cities and change: social movement or bureaucratic tool? Health Promotion International, 8, 31-40.
4. Bopp, M. and Bopp, J., 2004. Welcome to the swamp: addressing community capacity in ecohealth research and intervention. EcoHealth, 1, 24-34.
5. Campbell, H. and Marshall, C., 2000. Public involvement and planning: looking beyond the one to the many. International Planning Studies, 5, 321-344.
6. Clarke, J., 2004. Changing welfare, changing states: new directions in social policy. London: Sage.
7. Code, L., 1991. What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
8. Dixon, J., 1995. Community stories and indicators for evaluating community development. Community Development Journal, 30, 327-336.
9. Fischer, F., 2000. Citizens, experts, and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Durham: Duke University Press.
10. Gaventa, J. and Cornwall, A., 2001. Power and knowledge. In: P. Reason and H. Bradbury, eds. Handbook of action research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 70-80.
11. Gibson, K., O'Donnell, S., and Rideout, V., 2007. The project-funding regime: complications for community organizations and their staff. Canadian Public Administration, 50, 411-435.
12. Gilligan, C., 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D., 2004. Why deliberative democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
14. Haahr, J.H., 2004. Open co-ordination as advanced liberal government. Journal of European Public Policy, 11, 209-230.
15. Hampshire, K., Hills, E., and Iqbal, N., 2005. Power relations in participatory research and community development: a case study from Northern England. Human Organization, 64, 340-349.
16. Heritage, Z. and Dooris, M., 2003. Community participation and empowerment. In: A. Tsouros and J.L. Farrington, eds. WHO healthy cities in Europe: a compilation of papers on progress and achievements. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 51-66.
17. Heron, J. and Reason, P., 2001. The practice of cooperative inquiry: research'with' rather than 'on' people. In: P. Reason and H. Bradbury, eds. Handbook of Action Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 179-188.
18. Ilcan, S. and Basok, T., 2004. Community government: voluntary agencies, social justice, and the responsibilization of citizens. Citizenship Studies, 8, 129-144.
19. Kawakami, A.J., et al., 2008. Improving the practice of evaluation through indigenous values and methods: decolonizing evaluation practice-returning the gaze from Hawai'i and Aoteoroa. In: N.L. Smith and P.R. Brandon, eds. Fundamental issues in evaluation. New York: The Guilford Press, 219-242.
20. King, C.S., 2000. Talking beyond the rational. American Review of Public Administration, 30, 271-291.
21. Labonte, R., 1999. Mutual accountability in partnerships: health agencies and community groups. Promotion & Education, VI, 3-8.
22. Labonte, R., Feather, J., and Hills, M., 1999. A story/dialogue method for health promotion knowledge development and evaluation. Health Education Research, 14, 39-50.
23. Laforest, R. and Phillips, S., 2007. Citizen engagement: rewiring the policy process. In: M. Orsini and M. Smith, eds. Critical policy studies. Vancouver: UBC Press, 67-90.
24. Minkler, M., 2000. Using participatory action research to build healthy communities. Public Health Reports, 115, 191-197.
25. Nelson, A., et al., 2008. Engagement, but for what kind of marriage? Community members and local planning authorities. Community Development Journal, 43, 37-51.
26. Oakley, A., 2000. Experiments in knowing: gender and method in the social sciences. New York: The New Press.
27. O'Connor, M., et al., 1998. Women and health promotion: a feminist participatory model,. In: W.E. Thurston, J.D. Sieppert and V.J. Wiebe, eds. Doing health promotion research: the science of action. Calgary, AB: University of Calgary, Health Promotion Research Group, 63-80.
28. Parkinson, J., 2004. Why deliberate? The encounter between deliberation and new public managers. Public Administration, 82, 377-395.
29. Patton, M.Q., 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Power, M., 1997. The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Putland, C., Baum, F., and MacDougall, C., 1997. How can health bureaucracies consult effectively about their policies and practices? Some lessons from an Australian study. Health Promotion International, 12, 299-309.
32. Robertson, A. and Minkler, M., 1994. New health promotion movement: a critical examination. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 295-312.
33. Rose, N., 1993. Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society, 22, 283-299.
34. Sandercock, L., 2003. Cosmopolis II: Mongrel cities of the twenty-first century. London: Continuum Books.
35. Sanderson, I., 1999. Participation and democratic renewal: from 'instrumental' to 'commu- nicative rationality'? Policy & Politics, 27, 325-341.
36. Scott, J., 1998. Seeing like a state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37. Stevenson, H.M. and Burke, M., 1991. Bureaucratic logic in new social movement clothing: the limits of health promotion research. Health Promotion International, 6, 281-289.
38. Taylor, D., 2005. Governing through evidence: participation and power in policy evaluation. Journal of Social Policy, 34, 601-618.
39. Torgerson, D., 2003. Democracy through policy discourse. In: M.A. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, eds. Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 113-138.
40. Tronto, J., 1993. Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
41. VanderPlaat, M., 1997. Emancipatory politics, critical evaluation and government policy. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 12, 143-162.
42. Veenstra, G. and Lomas, J., 1999. Home is where the governing is: social capital and regional health governance. Health & Place, 5, 1-12.
43. Wainwright, H., 1993. A new kind of knowledge for a new kind of state. In: G. Albo, D. Langille and L. Panitch, eds. A different kind of state? Popular power and democratic administration. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
44. Webb, S., 2000. Feminist methodologies for social researching. In: D. Burton, ed. Research training for social scientists: a handbook for post-graduate researchers. London: Sage, 33-48.
45. White, G., 2006. Cultures in collision: traditional knowledge and Euro-Canadian governance processes in northern land-claim boards. Arctic, 59, 401-414.
46. Wismer, S., 1999. From the ground up: quality of life indicators and sustainable community development. Feminist Economics, 5, 109-114.
47. World Health Organization, 1986. Ottawa charter for health promotion. Available from: http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/ottawa_charter_hp.pdf
48. Young, I.M., 1987. Impartiality and the civic public. In: S. Benhabib and D. Cornell, eds. Feminism as critique. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 57-76.