Reproducibility of black blood dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in aortic plaques of atherosclerotic rabbits

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 191-198

  Calcagno, Claudia ^a   Vucic, Esad ^a   Mani, Venkatesh ^a,b   Goldschlager, Gregg ^a   Fayad, Zahi A ^a,b  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Atherosclerosis; DCE MRI; Neovascularization; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; AORTA ATHEROSCLEROSIS; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; BLACK BLOOD DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MALE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REMISSION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; ABDOMINAL AORTA; ANIMAL; AORTA; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; DIAGNOSTIC USE; DISEASE MODEL; EVALUATION STUDY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RABBIT;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ANIMALS; AORTA; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; AREA UNDER CURVE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; GADOLINIUM DTPA; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; RABBITS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 77954133526     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22225     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL, et al. Harrison's principles of internal medicine, 17th ed. Chapter 218. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008.
2. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 2006;367:1747-1757.
3. Hurks R, Peeters W, Derksen WJ, et al. Biobanks and the search for predictive biomarkers of local and systemic outcome in atherosclerotic disease. Thromb Haemost 2009;101:48-54.
4. Davies MJ, Richardson PD, Woolf N, Katz DR, Mann J. Risk of thrombosis in human atherosclerotic plaques: role of extracellular lipid, macrophage, and smooth muscle cell content. Br Heart J 1993;69:377-381. (Pubitemid 23171108)
5. Moreno PR, Falk E, Palacios IF, Newell JB, Fuster V, Fallon JT. Macrophage infiltration in acute coronary syndromes. Implications for plaque rupture. Circulation 1994;90:775-778.
6. Kerwin W, Hooker A, Spilker M, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of neovasculature volume in carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Circulation 2003;107:851-856. (Pubitemid 36241043)
7. Kerwin WS, O'Brien KD, Ferguson MS, Polissar N, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C. Inflammation in carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging study. Radiology 2006;241:459-468. (Pubitemid 44632892)
8. Kerwin WS, Oikawa M, Yuan C, Jarvik GP, Hatsukami TS. MR imaging of adventitial vasa vasorum in carotid atherosclerosis. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:507-514. (Pubitemid 351348221)
9. Rudd JH, Davies JR, Weissberg PL. Imaging of atherosclerosis - can we predict plaque rupture? Trends Cardiovasc Med 2005;15:17-24.
10. Rudd JH, Warburton EA, Fryer TD, et al. Imaging atherosclerotic plaque inflammation with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Circulation 2002;105:2708-2711.
11. Davies JR, Rudd JH, Weissberg PL. Molecular and metabolic imaging of atherosclerosis. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1898-1907.
12. Davies JR, Rudd JH, Weissberg PL, Narula J. Radionuclide imaging for the detection of inflammation in vulnerable plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47(8 Suppl):C57-68.
13. Zhang Z, Machac J, Helft G, et al. Non-invasive imaging of atherosclerotic plaque macrophage in a rabbit model with F-18 FDG PET: a histopathological correlation. BMC Nucl Med 2006;6:3.
14. Ogawa M, Magata Y, Kato T, et al. Application of 18F-FDG PET for monitoring the therapeutic effect of antiinflammatory drugs on stabilization of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1845-1850.
15. Rudd JH, Myers KS, Bansilal S, et al. Atherosclerosis inflammation imaging with 18F-FDG PET: carotid, iliac, and femoral uptake reproducibility, quantification methods, and recommendations. J Nucl Med 2008;49:871-878.
16. Calcagno C, Cornily JC, Hyafil F, et al. Detection of neovessels in atherosclerotic plaques of rabbits using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and 18F-FDG PET. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008;28:1311-1317.
17. Galbraith SM, Lodge MA, Taylor NJ, et al. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis. NMR Biomed 2002;15:132-142.
18. Padhani AR, Hayes C, Landau S, Leach MO. Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic MRI of normal human tissues. NMR Biomed 2002;15:143-153. (Pubitemid 34213404)
19. Jackson A, Jayson GC, Li KL, et al. Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in newly presenting glioma. Br J Radiol 2003;76:153-162. (Pubitemid 36553239)
20. Roberts C, Issa B, Stone A, Jackson A, Waterton JC, Parker GJ. Comparative study into the robustness of compartmental modeling and model-free analysis in DCE-MRI studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23:554-563.
21. Yankeelov TE, DeBusk LM, Billheimer DD, et al. Repeatability of a reference region model for analysis of murine DCE-MRI data at 7T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:1140-1147.
22. Rudd JH, Myers KS, Bansilal S, et al. (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation is highly reproducible: implications for atherosclerosis therapy trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:892-896. (Pubitemid 47268746)
23. Eliasziw M, Young SL, Woodbury MG, Fryday-Field K. Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther 1994;74:777-788. (Pubitemid 24245119)
24. Saam T, Hatsukami TS, Yarnykh VL, et al. Reader and platform reproducibility for quantitative assessment of carotid atherosclerotic plaque using 1.5T Siemens, Philips, and General Electric scanners. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:344-352.
25. El Aidi H, Mani V, Weinshelbaum KB, et al. Cross-sectional, prospective study of MRI reproducibility in the assessment of plaque burden of the carotid arteries and aorta. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2009;6:219-228.