Methods of electronic examination applied to students of Electronics: Comparison of results with the conventional (paper-and-pencil) method

WEBIST 2006 - 2nd International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, Proceedings

Volumn SEBEG, Issue EL/-, 2006, Pages 305-311

  Tsiakas, Panagiotis ^a   Stergiopoulos, Charalampos ^a   Kaitsa, Maria ^a   Triantis, Dimos ^a   Fragoulis, Ioannis ^a   Ninos, Konstantinos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST ATTICA   (Greece)

Author keywords

"e education"; "e examination"; Computerized testing systems; E learning; Electronic evaluation; Electronic examination; New technologies in education; Self evaluation

Indexed keywords

E-EDUCATION; E-EXAMINATION; ELECTRONIC EVALUATION; ELECTRONIC EXAMINATION; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; SELF EVALUATION; TESTING SYSTEMS;

E-LEARNING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INSTRUMENTS; TEACHING; TECHNOLOGY; WORLD WIDE WEB;

STUDENTS;

EID: 77954119943     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Ali N.S., Hodson-Carlton K., and Ryan M., 2004, Students' perceptions of online learning: Implications for teaching, Nurse Educator, 29, 111-115.
2. Bigum C., 1997, Teachers and computers. In control or being controlled? Australian Journal of Education, 41 (3), 247-261.
3. Bloom K.C., and Hough M.C., 2003, Student satisfaction with technology-enhanced learning. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 21, 241-246.
4. Buchanan T., 2002, Online assessment: Desirable or dangerous? Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 33, 148-154.
5. Bull, J., Conole, G., Davis, H.C., White, S., Sclater, N. 2002, Rethinking assessment through learning technologies. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE2002) Vol 1, 8-11 Dec 2002, Auckland, New Zealand. Auckland: UNITEC Institute of Technology
6. DeBord K.A., Aruguete M.S., and Muhlig J., 2004, Are computer-assisted teaching methods effective? Teaching of Psychology, 31, 65-68.
7. Dede C., 2000, Emerging Technologies and Distributed Learning in Higher Education. In: D. Hanna, ed., Higher Education in an Era of Digital Competition: Choices and Challenges, New York, 2000, New York: Atwood, 71-92.
8. Epstein J.,Klinkenberg W.D., Wiley D., and McKinley L., 2001, Insuring sample equivalence across Internet and paper-and-pencil assessments, Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 339-346.
9. Fox R. & Herrmann A., 1997, Designing study materials in new times: Changing distance education. In: T. Evans, V. Jakupec & D. Thompson, eds, Research in Distance Education, 1997, Geelong. Geelong: Deakin University Press, 34-44.
10. Fox R., 2002, Online technologies changing university practices, In: A. Herrmann & M. M. Kulski, eds, Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching, 2-4 February 2000, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA. Perth: Curtin University of Technology, 235-41.
11. Howard C., Schenk K., & Discenza R., 2004, Distance Learning and University Effectiveness: Changing Educational Paradigms for Online learning, London: Information Science Publishing (Idea Group Inc.).
12. Thomas P.G., 2003, Evaluation of Electronic Marking of Examinations, In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2003), 30 June - 2 July 2003, Thesaloniki, Greece. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 50-54.
13. Triantis D., Stavrakas I., Tsiakas P., Stergiopoulos C., Ninos D., 2004, A pilot application of electronic examination applied to students of electronic engineering: Preliminary results. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 1, 26-30.
14. Tsiakas P., Stergiopoulos C., Kaitsa M., Triantis D., 2005, New technologies applied in the educational process in the T.E.I. of Athens. The case of "e-education" platform and electronic examination of students. Results. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 2, 192-196.