Technical decomposition approach of critical to quality characteristics for Product Design for Six Sigma

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 325-339

  He, Yihai ^a   Tangb, Xiaoqing ^a   Changa, Wenbing ^a  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Critical to quality characteristics; Decomposition; Design for Six Sigma; Key parameter

Indexed keywords

AXIOMATIC DESIGN; CAR BODIES; COMPUTATION ALGORITHM; CRITICAL TO QUALITIES; CRITICAL TO QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS; CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS; DECOMPOSITION APPROACH; DECOMPOSITION PROCESS; DESIGN FOR SIX SIGMA; EVOLUTION MODELS; FUZZY TECHNIQUES; KEY PARAMETERS; MATRIX; NOISE VIBRATION HARSHNESS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; RELATIONAL TREES; ROUGH SET; SYSTEMATIC PROCESS;

COMPUTATION THEORY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; TREES (MATHEMATICS); WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 77954117628     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.1077     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hahn GJ. Six sigma: 20 key lessons learned. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2005;21:225-233.
2. Montgomery DC, Woodall WH. An overview of six sigma. International Statistical Review 2008;76(3):329-346.
3. Creveling CM, Slutsky JL, Antis D Jr. Design for Six Sigma in Technology and Product Development. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.
4. Antony J, Banuelas Coronado R. Design for six sigma. Manufacturing Engineer 2002;81(1):24-26.
5. Berryman ML. DFSS and big payoffs. Six Sigma Forum Magazine 2002;2(1):25-28.
6. El-Haik BS. Manufacturing and design for six sigma (X-FSS). D Eng Thesis, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Graduate Professional Programs, 2002.
7. Mader DP (SigmaPro Inc.). DFSS and your current design process. Quality Progress 2003;36(7):88-89.
8. Smith LR. Ford North American truck, six sigma and the evolution of quality in product development. Six Sigma Forum Magazine 2001;1(1):1-4.
9. Franza RM, Chakravorty SS. Design for six sigma (DFSS): A case study. PICMET Proceedings, Portland, OR, U. S. A., 5-9 August 2007; 1982-1.89.
10. Brady JE. Six sigma literature: A review and agenda for future research. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2006;22:335-367.
11. Shahin A. Design for Six Sigma (DFSS): Lessons learned from world-class companies. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage 2008;4(1):48-59.
12. Alp N, Yaworsky M, Kazemersky P. The identification of critical-to-quality (CTQ) characteristics by using the quality function deployment (QFD). Proceedings of National Conference of the American-Society- for-Engineering-Management, Huntsville, AL, 11-13 October 2001;402-4.6.
13. Reid RD. Characteristic management. Quality Progress 2003;36:71-73.
14. Juran JM. Quality Handbook. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1999.
15. Suh NP. Designing-in of quality through axiomatic design. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 1995;44:256-264.
16. Arccidiacono G, Campatelli G. Reliability improvement of a diesel engine using the FMETA approach. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2004;20:143-154.
17. Srikesh G, Robert BS. Failure mode identification through Clustering analysis. Quality and Reliability International 2004;20:511-526.
18. Geneto AM, Redonodo A. Rough sets and maintenance in a production line. Expert Systems 2003;20(5):271-279.
19. Zeng HL. Intelligent Computing. Chongqing University Press: Chongqing, 2004.
20. Facchinetti G. Note on ranking fuzzy triangular numbers. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 1998;13:613-622.
21. Braglia M. Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure node, effects and criticality analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2003;19:425-443.
22. Fredrik E. Improving system by combining axiomatic design, quality control tools and designed experiments. Research in Engineering Design 2000;12:204-219.
23. Zhang CY. Weighted mining and empirical analysis on the evaluation of development level of regional economy. Journal of Hainan Normal University (Natural Science) 2004;17(2):99-105.
24. Buyukozkan G. Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 2004;19:443-461. Authors' biographies