Improving Prediction of Work Performance Through Frame-of-Reference Consistency: Empirical evidence using openness to experience

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 230-235

  Pace, Victoria L ^a   Brannick, Michael T ^b  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954104375     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: 14682389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00506.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Amabile TM. The social psychology of creativity 1983, New York, NY, Springer-Verlag
2. Barrick MR, Mount MK. The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 1991, 44:1-26.
3. Bing MN, Whanger JC, Davison HK, VanHook JB. Incremental validity of the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores: A replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology 2004, 89:150-157.
4. Costa PT, McCrae RR. Revised NEO personality inventory and NEO five-factor inventory professional manual 1992, Odessa, FL, Psychological Assessment Resources
5. Griffin B, Hesketh B. Why openness to experience is not a good predictor of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2004, 12:243-251.
6. Hogan R, Roberts BW. Introduction: Personality and industrial and organizational psychology. Personality psychology in the workplace 2001, 3-16. Roberts BW, Hogan R. (Eds.), Washington, DC, American Psychological Association
7. Holtz BC, Ployhart RE, Dominguez A. Testing the rules of justice: The effects of frame-of-reference and pre-test validity information on personality test responses and test perceptions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2005, 13:75-86.
8. Hunthausen JM, Truxillo DM, Bauer TN, Hammer LB. A field study of frame-of-reference effects on personality test validity. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88:545-551.
9. Hurtz GM, Donovan JJ. Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 2000, 85:869-879.
10. Lievens F, De Corte W, Schollaert E. A closer look at the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores and validity. Journal of Applied Psychology 2008, 93:268-279.
11. Mischel W. Personality and assessment 1968, New York, NY, Wiley
12. Morgeson FP, Campion MA, Dipboye RL, Hollenbeck JR, Murphy K, Schmitt N. Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology 2007, 60:683-729.
13. Pace VL. 2005, Unpublished master's thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa
14. Robie C, Schmit MJ, Ryan AM, Zickar MJ. Effects of item context specificity on the measurement equivalence of a personality inventory. Organizational Research Methods 2000, 3:348-365.
15. Salgado JF. The five-factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology 1997, 82:30-43.
16. Schmidt FL, Hunter JE, McKenzie RC, Muldrow TW. Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology 1979, 64:609-626.
17. Schmit MJ, Ryan AM, Stierwalt SL, Powell AB. Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology 1995, 80:607-620.
18. Tett RP, Jackson DN, Rothstein M. Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology 1991, 44:703-742.
19. Viswesvaran C, Deller J, Ones DS. Personality measures in personnel selection: Some new contributions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2007, 15:354-358.