Understanding metadata and metadata schemes

Metadata: A Cataloger's Primer

Volumn 9780203051238, Issue , 2012, Pages 17-36

  Greenberg, Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Data structures; Information resources; Metadata; Metadata schemes; Modal (metadata objectives and principles domains architectural layout) framework

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954103273     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1300/J104v40n03_02     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Ann Arbor Accords: Principles and Criteria for an SGML Document Type Definition (DTD) for Finding Aids. (1996). http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/FindingAids/EAD/accords.html.
2. Caplan, P. 1995. You call it com, we call it syntax-independent metadata for document-like-objects. The Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 6 (94): http://info.Iib.uh.edu/pr/v6/n4/capl6n4.html/.
3. Caplan, P. 2003. Metadata Fundamentals for All Libraries. Chicago: American Library Association.
4. Carpenter, M. 1985. Statement of the Principles: International Conference on Cataloguing Principles, Paris, October, 1961, Editor’s Introduction. in Svenonius, E. and Carpenter, M. (Eds), Foundations of Cataloging: A Source Book. Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited, p. 176-178.
5. CIMI Consortium. 2001. CIMI Consortium for the Computer Interchange of Museum Information. Guide to Best Practice: Dublin Core, Version 1.1. http://www.cimi.org/old_site/documents/meta_bestprac_v 1_1_210400.pdf.
6. Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata, Part 1: Biological Data Profile. 1999. Biological Data Working Group Federal Geographic Data Committee and USGS Biological Resources Division, http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/documents/standards/biodata/biodatap.html.
7. Cutter, C. A. 1904. Rules for a Dictionary Catalog, 4th ed., (rewritten). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
8. Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) Codebook DTD. 2000. http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/DDI/CODEBOOK.TXT.
9. Design Principles for Text Encoding Guidelines: TEI ED PI. 1988 [rev. January 1990]. (The Poughkeepsie Principles were original published November, 13, 1987. The original publication is not accessible on the Web.)
10. DIG35 Specification: Metadata for Digital Images, Version 1.0. 2000. Digital Imaging Group, Inc. http://www.bgbm.fu-berlin.de/TDWG/acc/Documents/DIG35-vl.0-Sept00.pdf.
11. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1: Reference Description. 2003. http://www.dublincore.org/documents/2003/06/02/dces/.
12. Duval, E., Hodgins, W., Sutton, S., and Weibel, S. 2002. Metadata Principles and Practicalities. D-Lib Magazinehttp://www.dlib.org/dlib/april02/weibel/04weibel.html.
13. Encoded Archival Description Tag Library, Version 2002. 2002. Prepared and Maintained by the Encoded Archival Description Working Group of the Society of American Archivists and the Network Development and MARC Standards Office of the Library of Congress.
14. Federal Geographic Metadata Committee. 1998. Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (CSDGM). http://fgdc.er.usgs.gov/metadata/csdgm/.
15. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records [final report]. 1997. Recommended by the IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records; International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, IFLA Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC Programme. Frankfurt Am Main: IFLA UBCIM. http://www.ifla.Org/VII/s 13/frbr/frbr.htm.
16. Gateway to Educational Materials (GEM) Element Set. 1999. http://www.geminfo.org/Workbench/Metadata/GEM_Element_List.html [last modified 2001].
17. Gilliland-Swetland, A. 2000. Defining metadata, in M. Baca (ed.), Introduction to Metadata: Pathways to Digital Information.Los Angles, CA: Getty Information Institute. http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/intrometadata/2_articles/index. html.
18. Government Information Locator Service (GILS). 1997. http://www.gils.net/prof_v2.html.
19. Greenberg, I. 2001. A quantitative categorical analysis of metadata elements in image applicable metadata schemas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology52: 917-914.
20. Greenberg, I. 2003. Metadata and the World Wide Web. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, pp. 1876-1888. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
21. Heery, R. 1996. Review of metadata formats. Program, 30: 345-373.
22. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. 1963. Report: International Conference on Cataloguing Principles, Paris, 9th-18th October, 1961. London: Organizing Committee of the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles, p. 91-96.
23. Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood, eds., and translators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lagoze, C., Lynch, C. A., and Daniel, R. 1996. The Warwick Framework: A container architecture for aggregating sets of metadata. Available at: http://cs-tr.cs.comell.edu:80/Dients/Repository/2.0/Body/ncstrl.comell%2fTR96-1593/html.
25. Mathematical Markup Language (MathML™) 1.01 Specification W3C Recommendation. 1999. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-MathML/.
26. Milstead, I. and Feldman, S. 1999. Metadata: Cataloging by any other name. Online25-31. Also available at: http://www.onlineinc.com/onlinemag/OLl 999/milstead 1.html.
27. MODS Version 3.0. 2003. http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-0.xsd.
28. Moen, W. E., and Benardino, P. 2003. Assessing metadata utilization: An analysis of MARC content designation use. in Sutton, S., Greenberg, J., and Tennis, I. eds. 2003 Dublin Core Conference: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice-Metadata Research and Applications. DC-2003: Proceedings of the International DC MI Conference and Workshop. September 28-October 2, 2003, Seattle, Washington. Syracuse, NY: Information Institute of Syracuse.
29. RDF Site Summary 1.0 Specification (RSS). 2000. http://www.egroups.com/files/rss-dev/specification.html#.
30. RLG and Preservation. 1998. Working Group on Preservation Issues of Metadata Final Report, http://www.rlg.org./preserv/presmeta.html.
31. Smiraglia, R. P. 2001. The Nature of A Work': Implications for the Organization of Knowledge. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.
32. Smiraglia, R. P. and Leazer, G. H. 1999. Derivative bibliographic relationships: the work rel ation ship in a global bibliographic database. Journal of the A merican Society for Information Science50: 493-504.
33. Sperberg-McQueen, C. M. and Bumard, L. eds. 2002. TEIP4: Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange. Text Encoding Initiative Consortium. XML Version: Oxford, Providence, Charlottesville, Bergen.
34. Visual Resource Association Core Categories for Visual Resources (VRA CORE), version 2.0 1997. http://www.oberlin.edu/~art/vra/wc 1.html.
35. VRA Core Categories, Version 3.0.2000. Visual Resources Association Data Standard Committee, http://www.vra web.org/vracore3.htm [last modified 2002].
36. Weibel, S. and Hakala, J. 1998. A report on the workshop and subsequent developments. D-Lib Magazine:http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february98/02weibel.html.
37. Weibel, Stuart. 1995. Metadata: The foundations of resource description. D-Lib Magazine. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/July95/07weibel.html.
38. Weihs, J. ed. 1998. The Principles and Future of AACR2: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR2. Chicago: American Library Association.
39. Woodley, M. 2000. Metadata standards crosswalks. in Baca, M. ed., Introduction to Metadata: Pathways to Digital Information. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Information Institute. http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/intrometadata/3 _cro s swalks/index. html.
40. Woodley, M. S., Clement, G. and Winn, P. 2003. DCMI Glossary. http://dublincore.org/documents/2003/08/26/usageguide/glossary.shtml [last update, April 2004].
41. Zeng, M. L. 1999. Metadata elements for object description and representation: A case report from a digitized historical fashion collection project. Journal of the American Society for Information Science50: 1193-1208.