Evaluation of program performance and expenditures in a report of performance measures (RPM) via a case study of two Florida county tuberculosis programs

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 373-378

  Phillips, V L ^a   Teweldemedhin, B ^b   Ahmedov, S ^c   Cobb, J ^c   McNabb, S J N ^d  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WESTAT   (United States)

^c FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (United States)

^d CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Cost effectiveness; Evaluation; Management tools; Program performance

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH EXPENDITURE; MANAGEMENT; MONITORING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PLANNING METHOD; TUBERCULOSIS;

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITY CONTROL; TUBERCULOSIS; UNITED STATES; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

BENCHMARKING; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FLORIDA; HUMANS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; TUBERCULOSIS;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77954087191     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. AbouZahr C., Boerma T. Health information systems: The foundations of public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2005, 83(8):578-583. 10.1590/S0042-96862005000800010.
2. Akubakar I., Chalkey D., McEvoy M., Stanley N., Alshafi K. Evaluating compliance with national guidelines for the clinical, laboratory and public health management of tuberculosis in a low-prevalence English district. Public Health 2006, 120:155-260. 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.07.002.
3. Anderson L.M., Brownson R.C., Fullilove M.T., Teutsch S.M., Novick L.F., Fielding J., et al. Evidence-based public health policy and practice: Promises and limits. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005, 28(5S). 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.02.014.
4. Author, (2004). Applying a new conceptual framework to evaluate tuberculosis surveillance and action performance and measure the costs, Hillsborough County, Florida, 2002.
5. Black W.C. The cost-effectiveness plane: A graphic representation of cost-effectiveness plan. Medical Decision Making 1990, 10(3):212-214. 10.1177/0272989X9001000308.
6. Corso L.C., Wiesner P.J., Halverson P.K., Brown C.K. Using the essential services as a foundation for performance measurement and assessment of local public health systems. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 2000, 6(5):1-18.
7. Diex-Roux A.V. Multilevel analysis in public health research. Annual Review of Public Health 2000, 21:171-192. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.171.
8. Drummond M.F., Sculpher M.J., Torrance G.W., O'Brien B.J., Stoddart G.J. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. 3rd ed.
9. Ending neglect: The elimination of tuberculosis in the United States. Committee on the Elimination of Tuberculosis in the United States 2000, National Academy Press, Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC. L. Geiter (Ed.).
10. Gillespie K.N., Kurz R.S., McBride T., Schmitz H.H. Competencies for public health finance: An initial assessment and recommendations. Journal of Public Health Management 2004, 10(5):458-466.
11. Green R.S., Newman F.L. Total quality management principles promote increased utilization of client outcome data in behavioral health care. Evaluation and Program Planning 1999, 22(2):179-182.
12. Prevention effectiveness: A guide to decision analysis and economic evaluation 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford. A.C. Haddix, S.M. Teutsch, P.A. Corso (Eds.).
13. Hepburn V.A., Eger R., Kim J., Slade C. Structuring a framework for public health performance-based budgeting: A Georgia case study. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice 2007, 13(2):173-179.
14. Honore P.A., Amy B.W. Public health finance: Advancing a field of study thorough public health systems research. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 2005, 11(6):571-573.
15. Institute of Medicine The future of public health 1988, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
16. Livingood W.C., Coughlin S., Bowman W., Bryant T., Goldhagen J. Application of economic impact analysis to a local public health agency and its " academic health department" Public Health Reports 2007, 122:27-36.
17. Mackie P., Sims F. Cost and value: Everything or nothing?. Public Health 2006, 120(4):281-282. 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.02.001.
18. Newcomer K.E. Using performance measurement to improve public and nonprofit programs. New Directions for Evaluation, 75 1997, Josey-Bass Publications, San Francisco.
19. Public Health Foundation Measuring state expenditures. Research and Measurement in Public Health 1995, 11(6):58-73.
20. Schalock R.L., Bonham G.S. Measuring outcomes and managing for results. Evaluation and Program Planning 2003, 26(3):229-235. 10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00027-2.
21. Sturm R. Evidence-based health policy versus evidence-based medicine. Psychiatry Services 2002, 53(12):1499.
22. Subramanian S., Ekwueme D.U., Gardner J.G., Bapat B., Kramer C. Identifying and controlling for program-level differences in comparative cost analysis: Lessons from the economic evaluation of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Evaluation and Program Planning 2008, 31:136-144. 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.02.002.
23. Turnock B.J., Handler A., Hall W., Potsic S., Nalluri R., Vaughn E.H. Local health department effectiveness in addressing the core functions of public health. Public Health Reports 1994, 109(5):653-658.
24. United States Department of Energy. (1996). Implementation guide for use with independent and management assessment requirements of 10cfr part 830.120 and DOE 5700.6C quality assurance. DOE G414 1:1.