Butterfly conservation in Australia: The importance of community participation

Journal of Insect Conservation

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 305-311

  New, T R ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 77954086060     PISSN: 1366638X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-009-9252-z     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Craig JL, Saunders DA, Mattiske EM (1996) Effective conservation requires people networked for action. In: Saunders DA, Craig JL, Mattiske EM (eds) Nature conservation 4. The role of networks. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, pp 653-660.
2. Greenslade P (1999) What entomologists think about listing species for protection. In: Ponder W, Lunney D (eds) The other 99%. The conservation and biodiversity of invertebrates. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 345-349.
3. Masters BK (1996) Why community networks fail: the role of public servants and the community. In: Saunders DA, Craig JL, Mattiske EM (eds) Nature conservation 4. The role of networks. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, pp 199-204.
4. Mjadwesch R, Nally S (2008) Emergency relocation of a purple copper butterfly colony during roadworks: successes and lessons learnt. Ecol Manag Restor 9: 100-109.
5. Moore SA (1996) The role of trust in social networks: formation, function and fragility. In: Saunders DA, Craig JL, Mattiske EM (eds) Nature conservation 4. The role of networks. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, pp 148-154.
6. Nally S (2003) Community involvement in the conservation of endangered purple copper butterfly Paralucia spinifera Edwards & Common (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Rec S Aust Mus Monogr Ser 7: 217-224.
7. New TR (2009) Insect species conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Potter C, Moore M (1996) The National Threatened Species Network; an active community link. In: Saunders DA, Craig JL, Mattiske EM (eds) Nature conservation 4. The role of networks. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, pp 528-533.
9. Sands D (2008) Conserving the Richmond birdwing butterfly over two decades: where to next? Ecol Manag Restor 9: 4-16.
10. Sands DPA, New TR (2002) The action plan for Australian butterflies. Environment Australia, Canberra.
11. Sands DPA, New TR (2003) Coordinated invertebrate surveys in Australia's National Parks; an important tool in refining invertebrate conservation management. Rec S Aust Mus Monogr Ser 7: 203-207.
12. Sands DPA, Scott S (2002) The Richmond birdwing butterfly (Ornithoptera richmondia [Gray]): its natural history and progress towards recovery. In: Sands D, Scott S (eds) Conservation of birdwing butterflies SciComEd Pty & THECA. Chapel Hill, Brisbane, pp 32-47.
13. Sands DPA, Scott SE, Moffatt R (1997) The threatened Richmond birdwing butterfly (Ornithoptera richmondia [Gray]). Mem Mus Vict 56: 449-453.
14. Saunders DA, Craig JL, Mattiske EM (eds) (1996) Nature conservation 4. The role of networks. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton.
15. Scott S (2002) School and community participation in the Richmond Birdwing conservation project. In: Sands D, Scott S (eds) Conservation of birdwing butterflies SciComEd Pty & THECA. Chapel Hill, Brisbane, pp 185-193.
16. Williams S (1996) Community involvement in the species recovery process: insights into successful partnerships. In: Stephens S, Maxwell S (eds) Back from the brink. Refining the threatened species recovery process. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, pp 87-96.
17. Yen AL, Butcher RJ (1997) An overview of the conservation status of non-marine invertebrates in Australia. Environment Australia, Canberra.