|
Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 205-212
|
Comparison of the quality and timeliness of vital signs data using three different data-entry devices
|
Author keywords
Accuracy and timeliness of documentation; Clinical documentation system; Mobile devices; Observational study; Vital signs documentation
|
Indexed keywords
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARTICLE;
CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DOCUMENTATION;
EDUCATION;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
EQUIPMENT;
EVALUATION;
HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM;
HUMAN;
HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;
MEDICAL RECORD;
METHODOLOGY;
MICROCOMPUTER;
NURSING ASSESSMENT;
NURSING EDUCATION;
NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH;
NURSING STAFF;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
STANDARD;
TASK PERFORMANCE;
UNITED STATES;
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
VITAL SIGN;
DEVICE FAILURE;
ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD;
EVALUATION STUDY;
PROCEDURES;
STANDARDS;
STATISTICAL BIAS;
UTILIZATION;
ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION;
COMPUTER USER TRAINING;
COMPUTERS, HANDHELD;
DOCUMENTATION;
EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE;
HUMANS;
MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED;
NURSING ASSESSMENT;
NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH;
NURSING RECORDS;
NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL;
POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS;
SOUTH CAROLINA;
TIME AND MOTION STUDIES;
VITAL SIGNS;
|
EID: 77954080240
PISSN: 15382931
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181e1df19 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (34)
|
References (15)
|