Gender mainstreaming in education at the level of field operations: The case of CARE USA's indicator framework

Compare

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 441-458

  Miske, Shirley ^a   Meagher, Margaret ^b   DeJaeghere, Joan ^c  

^a Miske Witt and Associates Inc   (United States)

^b CARE USA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender equality indicators; Gender mainstreaming; NGO educational operations

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954076136     PISSN: 03057925     EISSN: 14693623     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2010.490367     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aikman, S., and E. Unterhalter. 2005. Introduction. In Beyond access: Transforming policy and practice for gender equality in education, ed. S. Aikman and E. Unterhalter, 1-14. Oxford: Oxfam.
2. CARE. 2005. Patsy Collins Trust Fund Initiative CARE Cambodia: Bending Bamboo detailed implementation plan. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: CARE Cambodia.
3. CARE. 2008. Patsy Collins Trust Fund Initiative Bending Bamboo Phase II: Working with the Constraints to education for marginalized girls. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: CARE Cambodia.
4. CARE USA. 2001. CARE USA's revised gender policy. Atlanta, GA: CARE USA.
5. CARE USA. 2005. Basic and girls' education: A 10-year review. Atlanta, GA: CARE USA.
6. CARE USA. 2006a. Summary report. Paper presented at the PCTFI Cohort One Workshop, December 4-5, in Cairo, Egypt.
7. CARE USA. 2006b. The courage to change: Confronting the limits and unleashing the potential of CARE's programming for women. Synthesis report: Phase 2. Atlanta, GA, USA: CARE International Strategic Impact Inquiry on Women's Empowerment.
8. CARE USA. 2007. CARE's global gender equity and diversity journey - A historical timeline 1993-2007. Atlanta, GA: CARE USA.
9. CARE USA. 2008a. Perspectives: Using a broad-based approach to conduct a comprehensive situational analysis. A field guide based on lessons learned and advice from CARE Offices implementing programs to address the marginalization of girls. Atlanta, GA: CARE USA.
10. CARE USA. 2008b. Educating marginalized girls - A cross-site comparison of situation analysis findings using a common indicator framework: CARE's Patsy Collins Trust Fund Initiative Cohort 1 - Cambodia, Honduras, Mali, and Tanzania. Unpublished paper, CARE USA, Atlanta, GA.
11. Dunne, M. 2009. Gender as an entry point for addressing social exclusion and multiple disparities in education. Technical paper presented at the UNGEI Global Advisory Committee Technical Meeting, May 27, in New York.
12. Hannan, C. 2004. Gender mainstreaming: A key strategy for promoting gender equality at national level. Presented at the UN-ESCAP high-level intergovernmental meeting to review regional implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action and its regional and global outcomes, September 7-10, in Bangkok, Thailand.
13. Kabeer, N. 1999a. Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. In Gender, poverty and well-being, ed. S. Razavi, 27-55. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
14. Kabeer, Naila. 1999b. The conditions and consequences of choice: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. UNRISD discussion paper no. 108, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva.
15. Leach, F. 2003. Practising gender analysis in education. Oxford: Oxfam.
16. Mannathoko, C. 2008. Promoting education quality through gender-friendly schools. In Girls' education in the 21st century: Gender equality, empowerment and economic growth, ed. M. Tembon, and L. Fort, 127-42. Washington, DC: World Bank.
17. March, C., I. Smyth, and M. Mukhopadhyay. 1999. A guide to gender frameworks. Oxford: Oxfam.
18. Maslak, M. 2008. Introduction. In The structure and agency of women's education, ed. M. Maslak, xiii-xxviii. Albany: State University of New York Press.
19. Mehra, R., and G.R. Gupta. 2006. Gender mainstreaming: Making it happen. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women.
20. Mikkelson, B., T. Freeman, B. Keller, et al. 2002. Mainstreaming gender equality: Sida's support for the promotion of gender equality in partner countries. Stockholm: Swedish International Development and Cooperation Agency.
21. Miske, S. 2008. Whose knowledge? Whose frameworks? Advancing the equity agenda through gender and education frameworks. Invited paper presented at the annual meeting of the Comparative and International Education Society, Gender Committee Symposium Panel 'Gender frameworks: Oversold or highly useful?, March 18, in New York.
22. Moser, C., and A. Moser. 2005. Gender mainstreaming since Beijing: A review of successes and limitations in international institutions. Gender and Development 13, no. 2: 11-22.
23. Narayan, D. 2001. 'Consultations with the poor' from a health perspective. Development 44, no. 1: 15-21.
24. Narayan, Deepa, ed. 2005. Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives. Washington, DC: World Bank.
25. Office of the Special Adviser on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2009. Intergovernmental mandates on gender mainstreaming. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/gendermainstreaming.htm.
26. Pigozzi, M. 2006. What is the 'quality of education'?: A UNESCO perspective. In Cross-national studies of the quality of education: Planning their design and managing their impact, ed. K. Ross and I. Jurgens Genevois, 40-51. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
27. Rao, A., and D. Kelleher. 2005. Is there life after gender mainstreaming? Gender and Development 13, no. 2: 57-69.
28. Rowlands, J. 1995. Empowerment examined. Development in Practice 5, no. 2: 101-7.
29. Silova, I. 2004. Gender review in education: Georgia. Unpublished paper, UNICEF, New York.
30. Style, E. 2000. Curriculum as window and mirror. In Professional development guide for educators (Vol. 1), ed. P. Gorski, G.T. Shin, and M. Green, 75-82. Washington, DC.: National Education Association.
31. Subrahmanian, R. 2007. Gender in primary and secondary education: A handbook for policy-makers and other stakeholders. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
32. UNESCO. 2004. EFA global monitoring report 2003/4. Gender and education for all: The leap to equality. Paris: UNESCO.
33. UNESCO. 2007. Synthesis report on GENIA and the gender focal point mechanism. Unpublished document, UNESCO, Bangkok.
34. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). 2001. Defining quality in education. Working paper series, UNICEF, New York.
35. United Nations. 2001, August. Gender mainstreaming: Strategy for promoting gender equality, 1. New York: Office of the Special Advisor on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women, United Nations.
36. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2004. A concept note, UNDP, New York.
37. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). n.d. Concept note on the use of gender sensitive qualitative indicators for monitoring implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action. http://www.unescap.org/esid/GAD/Events/High-level%20meeting%20Sep%20 2004/Final%20note%20qualitative%20indicators%20-%20Meena.pdf.
38. United Nations Economic and Social Council. 1997. Coordination of the policies and activities of the specialized agencies and other bodies of the United Nations system: Mainstreaming the gender perspective into all policies and programmes in the United Nations system: Report of the Secretary-General. United Nations Economic and Social Council 1997 Substantive Session, U.N. Doc. E/1997/66.
39. United States Agency for International Development (USAID). 2007. Gender equality in education: A dynamic framework. Washington, DC: MSI International. http:// www.usaid.gov/our_work/cross-cutting_programs/wid/ed/equate.html.
40. Unterhalter, E. 2005. Fragmented frameworks? Researching women, gender, education, and development. In Beyond access: Transforming policy and practice for gender equality in education, ed. S. Aikman and E. Unterhalter, 15-25. Oxford: Oxfam.
41. Wilson, D. 2003. Human rights promoting gender equality in and through education. Background paper for EFA Global Monitoring Report 2003/04, UNESCO, Paris.