Geophysical-geochemical investigation of fire-prone landfills

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 787-798

  Frid, Vladimir ^a   Doudkinski, Dmitri ^a   Liskevich, Gady ^a   Shafran, Efim ^a   Averbakh, Arie ^a   Korostishevsky, Nikolay ^a   Prihodko, Larisa ^a  

^a Ashdod   (Israel)

Author keywords

Electrical resistivity tomography; Fire gas mapping; Gas composition; Landfill

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICAL IMAGING; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRODE ARRAYS; GAS COMPOSITION; GAS COMPOSITIONS; GEOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATIONS; GEOCHEMICAL METHODS; GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY; LANDFILL GAS; SUBSURFACE TEMPERATURE; TEMPERATURE ANOMALY;

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; FIRES; GASES; SURVEYS; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; TOMOGRAPHY; WASTE DISPOSAL;

LAND FILL;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON MONOXIDE; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; ELECTRODE; FIRE; GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY; GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY; HYDROGEN SULFIDE; LANDFILL; MAPPING METHOD; METHANE; OXYGEN; TEMPERATURE ANOMALY; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 77954066415     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-009-0216-0     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Abu-Zeid N, Bianchini G, Santarato G, Vaccaro C (2004) Geochemical characterization and geophysical mapping of landfill leachates: the Marozzo canal case study (NE Italy). Environ Geol 45: 439-447. doi: 10. 1007/s00254-003-0895-x.
2. Aristodemou E, Thomas-Betts A (2000) DC resistivity and induced polarisation investigations at a waste disposal site and its environments. J Appl Geophys 44: 275-302. doi: 10. 1016/S0926-9851(99)00022-1.
3. Bernstone C, Dahlin T, Ohlsson T, Hogland W (2000) DC-resistivity mapping of internal landfill structures: two pre-excavation surveys. Env Geol 39(3-4): 360-368. doi: 10. 1007/s002540050015.
4. Dahlin T, Zhou B (2004) A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophys Prospect 52: 379-398. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2478. 2004. 00423. x.
5. Depountis N, Harris C, Davies MCR, Koukis G, Sabatakakis N (2005) Application of electrical imaging to leachate plume evolution studies under in situ and model conditions. Environ Geol 47: 907-914. doi: 10. 1007/s00254-004-1219-5.
6. El-Fadel M, Findikakis A, Leckie J (1977) Environmental impacts of solid waste landfilling. J Environ Manag 50: 1-25. doi: 10. 1006/jema. 1995. 0131.
7. Ezersky M (2008) Geoelectric structure of the Ein Gedi sinkhole occurrence site at the Dead Sea shore in Israel. J Appl Geophys 64: 56-69. doi: 10. 1016/j. jappgeo. 2007. 12. 003.
8. Ettala M, Rahkonen P, Rossi E, Mangs J, Keski-Rahkonen O (1996) Landfill fires in Finland. Waste Manag Res 14: 377-384.
9. Frid V, Liskevich G, Doudkinski D, Korostishevsky N (2008) Evaluation of landfill disposal boundary by means of electrical resistivity imaging. Environ Geol 53: 1503-1508. doi: 10. 1007/s00254-007-0761-3.
10. 2 emission rate estimations in landfills. Sci Total Environ 3 8 9: 522-531.
11. Hogland W, Marques M (2003) Physical, biological and chemical processes during storage and spontaneous combustion of waste fuel. Resour Conversat Recycl 40: 53-69. doi: 10. 1016/S0921-3449(03)00025-9.
12. Lanini S, Aguilar O, Lafebvre X, Ballansat G (1997) Temperature increase in landfills during the aerobic period. In: Proc Sardinia'97 (6th international landfill symposium), CISA, Environmental Sanitary Engineering Centre, Imola, Italy, pp 121-126.
13. Levitte D, Yechiely Y (2003) Dispersion and rate of ground water from the Hadera landfill solid waste. Isr Geol Survey report. 24 (in Hebrew).
14. Loke MH (2000) Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies A practical guide to 2D and 3D surveys. p 61, http://wwwheritagegeophysicscom/images/lokenotepdf.
15. Martinho E, Almeida F (2006) 3D behaviour of contamination in landfill sites using 2D resistivity/IP imaging: case studies in Portugal. Environ Geol 49: 1071-1078. doi: 10. 1007/s00254-005-0151-7.
16. Mondelli G, Giacheti HL, Boscov MEG, Elis VR, Hamada J (2007) Geoenvironmental site investigation using different techniques in a municipal solid waste disposal site in Brazil. Environ Geol 52: 871-887. doi: 10. 1007/s00254-006-0529-1.
17. Oygard Y, Mage A, Gjengedal E, Svane T (2005) Effect of an uncontrolled fire and the subsequent fire fight on the chemical composition of landfill leachate. Waste Manag 25: 712-718. doi: 10. 1016/j. wasman. 2004. 11. 008.
18. Soupios P, Papadopoulos I, Kouli M, Georgaki I, Vallianatos F, Kokkinou E (2006) Investigation of waste disposal areas using electrical methods: a case study from Chania, Crete, Greece. Environ Geol 51: 1249-1261. doi: 10. 1007/s00254-006-0418-7.
19. Soupios P, Papadopoulos N, Papadopoulos I, Kouli M, Vallianatos F, Sarris A, Manios T (2007) Application of integrated methods in mapping waste disposal areas. Environ Geol 53: 661-675. doi: 10. 1007/s00254-007-0681-2.
20. Stearns RP, Peyotan GS (1984) Identifying and controlling landfill sites. Waste Manag Res 2: 309.
21. United States Fire Administration (2002): Landfill fires, their magnitude, characteristics, and mitigation. Federal Emergency Management, Agency United States Fire Administration, National Fire Data Center. p 1-31.
22. Zhou W, Beck BF, Adams AL (2002) Effective electrode array in mapping karst hazards in electrical resistivity tomography. Env Geol 42: 922-928. doi: 10. 1007/s00254-002-0594-z.
23. Zume JT, Tarhule A, Christenson S (2006) Subsurface imaging of an abandoned solid waste landfill site in Norman, Oklahoma. Ground Water Monit Remediat 26(2): 62-69. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1745-6592. 2006. 00066. x.