Simplified electrostatic model for the thermodynamic excess potentials of binary strong electrolyte solutions with size-dissimilar ions

Molecular Physics

Volumn 108, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1435-1466

  Fraenkel, Dan ^a  

^a Eltron Research & Development Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Debye H ckel; electrolyte; ion size parameter; ionic; Poisson Boltzmann

Indexed keywords

BINARY STRONG ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS; COUNTERIONS; ELECTROLYTE ION; ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS; ELECTROLYTE SYSTEMS; ELECTROSTATIC CONTRIBUTIONS; ELECTROSTATIC ENERGIES; ELECTROSTATIC MODELS; ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL ENERGY; EXCESS FUNCTIONS; IONIC ATTRACTION; IONIC REPULSION; LINEAR COMBINATIONS; MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSIONS; MEAN IONIC ACTIVITY COEFFICIENT; POISSON-BOLTZMANN; REAL-LIFE SYSTEMS; SCREENING LENGTHS; SIZE PARAMETERS; SPHERICAL SURFACE;

BINARY MIXTURES; ELECTRIC FURNACES; ELECTROLYTES; ELECTROSTATICS; FUNCTIONS; ORE SINTER; THERMODYNAMICS;

IONS;

EID: 77954057868     PISSN: 00268976     EISSN: 13623028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00268971003716585     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. W. Sutherland, Philos. Mag. S. 6, 14, 1 (1907).
2. J.O'M. Bockris and A.K.N. Reddy, Modern Electrochemistry, 2nd edn. (Plenum Press, New York, 1998), Vol. 1, Chap. 3. Also 1st edn. (1970), Chap 3.
3. N. Davidson, Statistical Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962), Chap. 21.
4. P. Debye and E. Hückel, Physik. Z. 24, 185 (1923).
5. R.A. Robinson and R.H. Stokes, Electrolyte Solutions, 2nd edn. (Butterworths, London, 1959).
6. C.W. Davies, Ion Association (Butterworths, London, 1962).
7. H.S. Harned and B.B Owen, The Physical Chemistry of Electrolytic Solutions, 3rd edn. (Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York, 1958).
8. R.H. Fowler and E.A. Guggenheim, Statistical Thermodynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1965).
9. J.N. Butler, Ionic Equilibrium (Wiley, New York, 1998).
10. K.S. Pitzer and L. Brewer, Thermodynamics, Lewis and Randall, 2nd edn. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1961).
11. J.C. Rasaiah and H.L. Friedman, J. Chem. Phys. 48, 2742 (1968).
12. J.C. Rasaiah, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 3071 (1972).
13. H.L. Friedman, in Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry, No. 6, edited by J.O'M. Bockris and B.E. Conway (Plenum Press, New York, 1971), p. 1.
14. J.E. Mayer, J. Chem. Phys. 18, 1426 (1950).
15. W.G. McMillan Jr and J.E. Mayer, J. Chem. Phys. 13, 276 (1945).
16. J.M.G. Barthel, H. Krienke and W. Kunz, Physical Chemistry of Electrolyte Solutions, Topics in Physical Chemistry 5 (Steinkoppf, Darmstadt, 1998).
17. H.C. Andersen, in Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry, No. 11, edited by B.E. Conway and J.O'M. Bockris (Plenum Press, New York, 1975), p. 1, Chap. 1.
18. J.P. Valleau, L.K. Cohen and D.N. Card, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 5942 (1980).
19. J.C. Rasaiah and H.L. Friedman, J. Chem. Phys. 50, 3965 (1969);
20. J.C. Rasaiah, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 704 (1970);
21. M.C. Abramo, C. Caccamo, G. Malescio, G. Pizzimenti and S.A. Rogde, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 4396 (1984).
22. K.S. Pitzer and G. Mayerga, J. Phys. Chem. 77, 2300 (1973).
23. R. Triolo, L. Blum and M.A. Floriano, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 5956 (1977);
24. R. Triolo, J.R. Grigera and L. Blum, J. Phys. Chem. 80, 1858 (1976);
25. R. Triolo, L. Blum and M.A. Floriano, J. Phys. Chem. 82, 1368 (1978).
26. J.-F. Lu, Y.-X. Yu and Y.-G. Li, Fluid Phase Equilibria 85, 81 (1993).
27. W.R. Fawcett and A.C. Tikanen, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 4251 (1996);
28. A.C. Tikanen and W.R. Fawcett, J. Electroanal. Chem. 439, 107 (1997).
29. Y. Marcus, Chem. Rev. 88, 1475 (1988).
30. J.G. Kirkwood, J. Chem. Phys. 2, 767 (1934).
31. C.W. Outhwaite, J. Chem. Phys. 50, 2277 (1969);
32. C.W. Outhwaite, Mol. Phys. 27, 561 (1974).
33. M.M. Martinez, L.B. Bhuiyan and C.W. Outhwaite, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 86, 3383 (1990);
34. C.W. Outhwaite, M. Molero and L.B. Bhuiyan, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 87, 3227 (1991);
35. C.W. Outhwaite, M. Molero and L.B. Bhuiyan, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 89, 1315 (1993);
36. M. Molero, C.W. Outhwaite and L.B. Bhuiyan, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 88, 1541 (1992).
37. J.P. Valleau and L.K. Cohen, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 5935 (1980).
38. B. Forsberg, J. Ulander and R. Kjellander, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 064502 (2005).
39. M.M. Thomlinson and C.W. Outhwaite, Mol. Phys. 47, 1113 (1982).
40. βq/ε [3].) φ(r) is therefore a combination of φs arising from ρ≠0 and ρ = 0.
41. P. Atkins, Physical Chemistry, 6th edn. (Freeman, New York, 1998).
42. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 82nd edn., D.R. Lide, Editor-in-Chief (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001-2), 5-97-5-103,6-3 and references therein;
43. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 65th edn.; R.C Weast, Editor (CRC Press, Cleveland, 1984-5), F-165.
44. Properties of Aqueous Solutions of Electrolytes, I.D. Zaytzev and G.G. Aseyev, Editors; Trans. by M.A. Lazarev and V.R. Sorochenko (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1992).
45. Activity coefficient data of cyanometal complexes were taken from refs. 5 and 7, and from C.H. Brubaker Jr, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78, 5762 (1956);
46. R.A. Wynveen, J.L. Dye and C.H. Brubaker Jr, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82, 4441 (1960);
47. K.O. Groves, J.L. Dye and C.H. Brubaker Jr, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82, 4445 (1960).
48. 2 are from F. Malatesta, A. Giacomelli and R. Zamboni, J. Solution Chem. 25, 61 (1996).
49. 10 are from G Miller and A.S. Porter, Trans. Faraday Soc. 63, 335 (1967).
50. P.N. Vorontsov-Vel'yaminov and A.M. El'yashevich, Elektrokhimiya 4, 1430 (1968).
51. D.N. Card and J.P. Valleau, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 6232 (1970).
52. F. Malatesta and R. Zamboni, J. Solution Chem. 26, 61 (1996).
53. R. Buchner, T. Chen and G. Hefner, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 2365 (2004).
54. N.N. Greenwood and A. Earnshaw, Chemistry of the Elements, 2nd edn. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1997), pp. 526-529, Chap. 12.
55. T.L. Hill, An Introduction to Statistical Thermodynamics (Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1960, 1986).
56. + and ionic size being strongly dependent on the counter ion) which ends up blundering with hydration theories [5]. However, the cavity effect has a negligible contribution in a DH-type treatment anyway, since that effect applies only to β ions; as argued in the Discussion section, α ions are seen by the β ion as point charges occupying zero space in the solution and the concentration, or ionic strength, is that of α ions [3]. Besides, incorporating a cavity effect (such as in the above-mentioned Equation (18-22)) does not seem to result in satisfactory agreement with experiment [41] and like the ion hydration model, it appears to be at odds with the many γ ± vs. m curves not exhibiting minima.
57. S. Nordholm, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 5759 (1983).
58. D. Fraenkel, in preparation.