At home abroad: The presidential election of 2004, the politics of American social policy and what European readers might make of these subjects

Social Policy Review 17: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 125-146

  Marmor, Theodore ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954057768     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (13)

1. Barone, M. (2005) ‘Eyes on the future’, US News and World Report, vol 138, no 3, p 36.
2. Caplan, C. and Brangan, N. (2000) ‘The status of Medicare Part A and Part B trust funds: the trustees’ year 2000 reports (revised)’, AARP Public Policy Institute, April (www.research.aarp.org/health/dd45r_funds.pdf).
3. Center for Medicare Advocacy (2004) ‘Will the Medicare Act of 2003 really do that? Myths and realities about the new law’, 1 April, Williamantic, CT: Center for Medicare Advocacy.
4. de Gier, E., de Swaan, A. and Ooijens, M. (eds) (2004) Dutch welfare reform in an expanding Europe: The neighbours’ view, Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis Publishers.
5. Greenberg, S. (2004) ‘Solving the paradox of2004: why Americans wanted change but voted for continuity’, Unpublished memorandum, 9 November, p 1.
6. Hickey, R. (2005) ‘A battle progressives can win: Bush’s privatisation splinters Republicans and unites Democrats’, The American Prospect, 1 February, pp A4-5.
7. Le Bourdais, C. (2004) ‘New century, new risks’, Conference presentation, ‘New century, new risks: challenges for social development in Canada’, McGill University, 18 November.
8. Marmor, T.R. (2000) The politics of Medicare (2nd edn), New Jersey, NJ: Aldine.
9. Marmor, T.R. (2004) ‘The presidential election, US social policy and whether Canadians should care’, Policy Options, vol 26, no 1, pp 37-41.
10. Marmor, T.R. and Hacker, J.S. (2005) ‘Medicare reform and social insurance: the clashes of 2003 and their potential fallout’, Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics, vol 5, no 1, pp 475-89.
11. Marmor, T.R. and Mashaw, J. (2005) ‘Private ownership, collective default: the Bush proposals for social security are about dismantling the current system — and not saving it’, Newday, 10 January, pp A31-32.
12. Martin, P and Nadeau, R. (2004) ‘La victoire de Bush n’annonce pas une mainmise republicaine sur la Maison-Blanche’, Policy Options, vol 26, no 1, pp 42-7.
13. Scully, T. (2004) Personal interview with the author, 19 July, Washington, DC.