Haemolymph defence of an invasive herbivore: Its breadth of effectiveness against predators

Journal of Applied Entomology

Volumn 134, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 439-448

  Lundgren, J G ^a   Toepfer, S ^b,c   Haye, T ^b   Kuhlmann, U ^b  

^a NORTH CENTRAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b CABI   (Switzerland)

^c CABI Europe   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Biological control; Carabidae; Diel cycle; Lycosidae; Tetramorium caespitum; Zea mays

Indexed keywords

ANT; BEETLE; BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; DEFENSE BEHAVIOR; DIEL VARIATION; FOOD WEB; FUNCTIONAL ROLE; GUILD; HERBIVORE; INVASIVE SPECIES; LARVA; MAIZE; PREDATOR; PREY LOCATION; RANGE EXPANSION; RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT; SPIDER;

CARABIDAE; DIABROTICA; FORMICIDAE; HEXAPODA; LYCOSIDAE; TETRAMORIUM CAESPITUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77954049892     PISSN: 09312048     EISSN: 14390418     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01478.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Beattie AJ, Hughes L. Ant-plant interactions. Plant-animal interactions: an evolutionary approach 2002, 211-235. MHerrera C, Pellmyr O. Ed. by, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK
2. Boevé J-L, Schaffner U. Why does the larval integument of some sawfly species disrupt so easily? The harmful haemolymph hypothesis. Oecologia 2003, 134:104-111.
3. Bowers MD. The evolution of unpalatability and the cost of chemical defense in insects. Insect chemical ecology 1992, 216-244. Roitberg BDIsman MB. Ed. by, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
4. Deffernez L, Champagne P, Verhaeghe J-C, Josens G, Loreau M. Analysis of the spatio-temporal niche of foraging grassland ants in the field. Insect. Soc. 1990, 37:1-13.
5. Dennison DF, Hodkinson ID. Structure of the predatory beetle community in a woodland soil ecosystem. V. Summary and conclusions. Pedobiologia 1984, 26:171-177.
6. Dettner K. Chemosystematics and evolution of beetle chemical defenses. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1987, 32:17-48.
7. Downie IS, Wilson WL, Abernethy VJ, McCracken DI, Foster GN, Ribera I, Murphy KJ, Waterhouse A. The impact of different agricultural land-uses on epigeal spider diversity in scotland. J. Insect Conserv. 1999, 3:273-286.
8. Drees BBM, Summerlin B, Vinson SB. Foraging activity and temperature relationship for the red imported fire ant. Southwest. Entomol. 2007, 32:149-155.
9. Duelli P, Obrist MK. In search of the best correlates for local organismal biodiversity in cultivated areas. Biodivers. Conserv. 1998, 7:297-309.
10. Duelli P, Obrist MK, Schmatz DR. Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: above-ground insects. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1999, 74:33-64.
11. Happ GM, Eisner T. Hemorrhage in a coccinellid beetle and its repellent effect on ants. Science 1961, 134:329-331.
12. Harwood JD, Yoo HJS, Rowley DL, Greenstone MH, O' Neil RJ. Differential impact of adults and nymphs of a generalist predator on an exotic invasive pest demonstrated by molecular gut-content analysis. Biol. Invasions 2009, 11:895-903.
13. Hilker M, Eschbach U, Dettner K. Occurrence of anthraquinones in eggs and larvae of several Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Naturwissenschaften 1992, 79:271-274.
14. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. The ants 1990, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA
15. de Jong PW, Holloway GJ, Brakefield PM, de VosH. Chemical defence in ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae). II. Amount of reflex fluid, the alkaloid adaline and individual variation in defence in 2-spot ladybirds (adalia bipunctata). Chemoecology 1991, 2:15-19.
16. Juen A, Traugott M. Revealing species-specific trophic links in soil food webs: molecular identification of scarab predators. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:1545-1557.
17. Laurent P, Braekman J-C, Daloze D. Insect chemical defense. Top. Curr. Chem. 2005, 240:167-229.
18. Luff ML. Diel activity patterns of some field Carabidae. Ecol. Entomol. 1978, 3:53-62.
19. Lundgren JG, Shaw JT, Zaborski ER, Eastman CE. The influence of organic transition systems on beneficial ground-dwelling arthropods and predation of insects and weed seeds. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 2006, 21:227-237.
20. Lundgren JG, Haye T, Toepfer S, Kuhlmann U. A multi-faceted haemolymph defense against predation in Diabrotica virgifera virgifera larvae. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2009a, 19:871-880.
21. Lundgren JG, Nichols S, Prischmann DA, Ellsbury MM. Seasonal and diel activity patterns of generalist predators associated with Diabrotica virgifera immatures (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2009b, 19:327-333.
22. Lundgren JG, Prischmann DA, Ellsbury MM. Analysis of the predator community of a subterranean herbivorous insect based on polymerase chain reaction. Ecol. Appl. 2009c, 19:2157-2166.
23. Müller C, Arand K. Trade-offs in oviposition choice? Food-dependent performance and defence against predators of a herbivorous sawfly. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2007, 124:153-159.
24. Nunez MA, Simberloff D, Relva MA. Seed predation as a barrier to alien conifer invasions. Biol. Invasions 2008, 10:1389-1398.
25. Park O. Concerning community symmetry. Ecology 1941, 22:164-167.
26. Parker JD, Burkepile DE, Hay ME. Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science 2006, 311:1459-1461.
27. Pasteels JM, Braekman JC, Daloze D, Ottinger R. Chemical defence in chrysomelid larvae and adults. Tetrahedron 1982, 38:1891-1897.
28. Pasteels JM, Grégoire J-C, Rowell-Rahier M. The chemical ecology of defense in arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1983, 28:263-289.
29. Pasteels JM, Daloze D, de Bisseau J-C, Termonia A, Windsor DM. Patterns in host-plant association and defensive toxins produced by neotropical chrysomeline beetles. New developments in the biology of Chrysomelidae 2004, 669-676. Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay JA, Schmitt M, Ed. by, SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands
30. Peck DC. Reflex bleeding in froghoppers (Homoptera: Cercopidae): variation in behavior and taxonomic distribution. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2000, 93:1186-1194.
31. Petre C-A, Detrain C, Boevé J-L. Anti-predator defence mechanisms in sawfly larvae of Arge (Hymenoptera, Argidae). J. Insect Physiol. 2007, 53:668-675.
32. Pfannenstiel RS. Nocturnal predators and their impact on lepidopteran eggs in annual crops: what we don't see does help us!. Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on biological control of arthropods 2005, 463-471. Hoddle MS. Ed. by, USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2005-08, Washington, USA
33. Pol R, Lopez de Casenave J. Activity patterns of harvester ants Pogonomyrmex pronotalis and Pogonomyrmex rastratus in the central Monte desert, Argentina. J. Insect Behav. 2004, 17:647-661.
34. Tallamy DW, Hibbard BE, Clark TL, Gillespie JJ. Western corn rootworm, cucurbits and cucurbitacins. Western corn rootworm: ecology and management 2005, 67-94. Vidal S, Kuhlmann U, Edwards CR, Ed. by, CAB International, Wallingford, UK
35. Toepfer S, Kuhlmann U. Constructing life-tables for the invasive maize pest Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (Col., Chrysomelidae) in Europe. J. Appl. Entomol. 2006, 130:193-205.
36. Toepfer S, Haye T, Erlandson M, Goettel M, Lundgren JG, Kleespies RG, Weber DC, Cabrera Walsh G, Peters A, Ehlers R-U, Strasser H, Moore D, Keller S, Vidal S, Kuhlmann U. A review of the natural enemies of beetles in the subtribe Diabroticina (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): implications for sustainable pest management. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2009, 19:1-65.
37. Vleiger L, Brakefield PM, Müller C. Effectiveness of the defence mechanism of the turnip sawfly, Athalia rosae (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae), against predation by lizards. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2007, 94:283-289.
38. Weber DC, Pfannenstiel RS, Lundgren JG. Diel predation pattern assessment and exploitation of sentinel prey: new interpretations of community & individual behaviors. Proceedings of the Third ISBCA 2009, Christchurch, New Zealand