Mixed linear-non-linear inversion of crustal deformation data: Bayesian inference of model, weighting and regularization parameters

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 181, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1441-1458

  Fukuda, Jun'ichi ^a   Johnson, Kaj M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Inverse theory; Probability distributions; Seismic cycle

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CRUSTAL DEFORMATION; DATA INVERSION; GEODETIC DATUM; INVERSE ANALYSIS; INVERSE PROBLEM; LEAST SQUARES METHOD; MODELING; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SMOOTHING;

EID: 77954047800     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04564.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Akaike H. Likelihood and the Bayes procedure. Bayesian Statistics 1980, 143-166. Bernardo JMDeGroot MHLindly DVSmith AFM. eds, University Press, Valencia, Spain
2. Árnadóttir T, Segall P. The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake imaged from inversion of geodetic data. J. geophys. Res. 1994, 99(B11):21 835-21 855.
3. Aster RC, Borchers B, Thurber CH. Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems 2005, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands
4. Bennett RA, Friedrich AM, Furlong KP. Codependent histories of the San Andreas and San Jacinto fault zones from inversion of fault displacement rates. Geology 2004, 32:961-964.
5. Brooks BA, Frazer LN. Importance reweighting reduces dependence on temperature in Gibbs samplers: an application to the coseismic geodetic inverse problem. Geophys. J. Int. 2005, 161:12-20.
6. Brooks BA, Foster JH, Bevis M, Frazer LN, Wolfe CJ, Behn M. Periodic slow earthquakes on the flank of Kilauea volcano, Hawai'i. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 2006, 246:207-216.
7. Carlin BP, Louis TA. Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis 2000, 2nd edn, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida
8. Du Y, Aydin A, Segall P. Comparison of various inversion techniques as applied to the determination of a geophysical deformation model for the 1983 Borah Peak earthquake. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1992, 82:1840-1866.
9. Dzurisin D. A comprehensive approach to monitoring volcano deformation as a window on the eruption cycle. Rev. Geophys. 2003, 41(1):1001. 10.1029/2001RG000107, doi
10. Fialko Y. Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San Andreas fault system. Nature 2006, 441:968-971.
11. Freymueller J, King NE, Segall P. The co-seismic slip distribution of the Landers earthquake. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1994, 84:646-659.
12. Fukahata Y, Wright TJ. A non-linear geodetic data inversion using ABIC for slip distribution on a fault with an unknown dip angle. Geophys. J. Int. 2008, 173:353-364.
13. Fukahata Y, Yagi Y, Matsu'ura M. Waveform inversion for seismic source processes using ABIC with two sorts of prior constraints: Comparison between proper and improper formulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003, 30(6):1305. 10.1029/2002GL016293, doi
14. Fukuda J, Johnson KM. A fully Bayesian inversion for spatial distribution of fault slip with objective smoothing. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2008, 98:1128-1146.
15. Fukuda J, Johnson KM, Larson KM, Miyazaki S. Fault friction parameters inferred from the early stages of afterslip following the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake. J. geophys. Res. 2009, 114:B04412. 10.1029/2008JB006166, doi
16. Funning GJ. Source parameters of large shallow earthquakes in the Alpine-Himalayan belt from InSAR and waveform modelling. 2005, PhD thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford
17. Gallagher K, Charvin K, Nielsen S, Sambridge M, Stephenson J. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling methods to determine optimal models, model resolution and model choice for Earth Science problems. Marine Petrol. Geol. 2009, 26:525-535.
18. Gamerman D. Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference 1997, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida
19. Gelman A, Carlin JS, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Bayesian Data Analysis 2004, 2nd edn, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida
20. Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice 1996, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida
21. Grandis H, Menvielle M, Roussignol M. Bayesian inversion with Markov chains. Part I. The magnetotelluric one-dimensional case. Geophys. J. Int 1999, 138:757-768.
22. Hastings WK. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 1970, 57:97-109.
23. Hilley GE, Bürgmann R, Zhang P-Z, Molnar P. Bayesian inference of plastosphere viscosities near the Kunlun Fault, northern Tibet. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32:L01302. 10.1029/2004GL021658, doi
24. Hreinsdóttir S, Freymueller JT, Fletcher HJ, Larsen CF, Bürgmann R. Coseismic slip distribution of the 2002 MW7.9 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska, determined from GPS measurements. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003, 30(13):1670. 10.1029/2003GL017447, doi
25. Johnson KM, Segall P. Imaging the ramp-décollement geometry of the Chelungpu fault using coseismic GPS displacements from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake. Tectonophysics 2004a, 378:123-139.
26. Johnson KM, Segall P. Viscoelastic earthquake cycle models with deep stress-driven creep along the San Andreas fault system. J. geophys. Res. 2004b, 109:B10403. 10.1029/2004JB003096, doi
27. Johnson KM, Hsu Y, Segall P, Yu S. Fault geometry and slip distribution of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake imaged from inversion of GPS data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2001, 28(11):2285-2288.
28. Johnson KM, Segall P, Yu SB. A viscoelastic earthquake cycle model for Taiwan. J. geophys. Res. 2005, 110:B10404. 10.1029/2004JB003516, doi
29. Johnson KM, Hilley GE, Bürgmann R. Influence of lithosphere viscosity structure on estimates of fault slip rate in the Mojave region of the San Andreas fault system. J. geophys. Res. 2007, 112:B07408. 10.1029/2006JB004842, doi
30. Jónsson S, Zebker H, Segall P, Amelung F. Fault slip distribution of the 1999 MW 7.1 Hector Mine, California, earthquake, estimated from satellite radar and GPS measurements. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2002, 92:1377-1389.
31. Khan A, Connolly JAD, Maclennan J, Mosegaard K. Joint inversion of seismic and gravity data for lunar composition and thermal state. Geophys. J. Int. 2007, 168:243-258.
32. Langbein JO. Deformation of the Long Valley Caldera, California: inferences from measurements from 1988 to 2001. J. Volc. Geotherm. Res. 2003, 127:247-267.
33. MacKay DJC. Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms 2003, Cambridge University Press, New York
34. Malinverno A. A Bayesian criterion for simplicity in inverse problem parametrization. Geophys. J. Int. 2000, 140:267-285.
35. Malinverno A. Parsimonious Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo inversion in a nonlinear geophysical problem. Geophys. J. Int. 2002, 151:675-688.
36. Malinverno A, Briggs VA. Expanded uncertainty quantification in inverse problems: Hierarchical Bayes and empirical Bayes. Geophysics 2004, 69:1005-1016.
37. Malinverno A, Leaney WS. Monte-Carlo Bayesian look-ahead inversion of walkaway vertical seismic profiles. Geophys. Prospect. 2005, 53:689-703.
38. Malinverno A, Parker RL. Two ways to quantify uncertainty in geophysical inverse problems. Geophysics 2006, 71:W15-W27.
39. Matthews MV, Segall P. Estimation of depth-dependent fault slip from measured surface deformation with application to the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. J. geophys. Res. 1993, 98(B7):12153-12163.
40. McCaffrey R. Block kinematics of the Pacific-North America plate boundary in the southwestern United States from inversion of GPS, seismological, and geologic data. J. geophys. Res. 2005, 110:B07401. 10.1029/2004JB003307, doi
41. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 1953, 21:1087-1092.
42. Mitsuhata Y, Uchida T, Murakami Y, Amano H. The Fourier transform of controlled-source time-domain electromagnetic data by smooth spectrum inversion. Geophys. J. Int. 2001, 144:123-135.
43. Monelli D, Mai PM, Jónsson S, Giardini D. Bayesian imaging of the 2000 Western Tottori (Japan) earthquake through fitting of strong motion and GPS data. Geophys. J. Int 2008, 176:135-150.
44. Mosegaard K, Sambridge M. Monte Carlo analysis of inverse problems. Inverse Problems 2002, 18:R29-R54.
45. Mosegaard K, Tarantola A. Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems. J. geophys. Res. 1995, 100(B7):12431-12447.
46. Mosegaard K, Singh S, Snyder D, Wagner H. Monte Carlo analysis of seismic reflections from Moho and the W reflector. J. geophys. Res. 1997, 102(B2):2969-2981.
47. Nishimura T. Distribution of seismic coupling on the subducting plate boundary in northeastern Japan inferred from GPS observations. Tectonophysics 2000, 323:217-238.
48. Okada Y. Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1985, 75:1135-1154.
49. Rolandone F, Dreger D, Murray M, Bürgmann R. Coseismic slip distribution of the 2003 MW 6.6 San Simeon earthquake, California, determined from GPS measurements and seismic waveform data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33:L16315. 10.1029/2006GL027079, doi
50. Sambridge M, Mosegaard K. Monte Carlo methods in geophysical inverse problems. Rev. Geophys. 2002, 40(3):1009. 10.1029/2000RG000089, doi
51. Sambridge M, Gallagher K, Jackson A, Rickwood P. Trans-dimensional inverse problems, model comparison and the evidence. Geophys. J. Int. 2006, 167:528-542.
52. Savage JC, Burford RO. Geodetic determination of relative plate motion in central California. J. geophys. Res. 1973, 78(5):832-845.
53. Schmidt D, Bürgmann R, Nadeau RM, d'Alessio M. Distribution of aseismic slip rate on the Hayward fault inferred from seismic and geodetic data. J. geophys. Res. 2005, 110:B08406. 10.1029/2004JB003397, doi
54. Schott J-J, Roussignol M, Menvielle M, Nomenjahanary FR. Bayesian inversion with Markov chains-II. the one-dimensional DC multilayer case. Geophys. J. Int 1999, 138:769-783.
55. Simons M, Fialko Y, Rivera L. Coseismic deformation from the 1999 MW 7.1 Hector Mine, California, earthquake as inferred from InSAR and GPS observations. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2002, 92:1390-1402.
56. Tarantola A. Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation 2005, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia
57. Wright TJ, Lu Z, Wicks C. Constraining the slip distribution and fault geometry of the MW 7.9, 3 November 2002, Denali fault earthquake with interferometric synthetic aperture radar and global positioning system data. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2004, 94:S175-S189.
58. Yabuki T, Matsu'ura M. Geodetic data inversion using a Bayesian information criterion for spatial distribution of fault slip. Geophys. J. Int 1992, 109:363-375.
59. Yoshioka S. Coseismic slip distribution of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake deduced from inversion analysis of GPS data. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2001, 91:1182-1189.