Overview of the superfund program

Reclaiming the Land: Rethinking Superfund Institutions, Methods and Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 25-47

  Farrell, Alexander E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954039072     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-48857-8_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2003a. ATSDR CEP Site Count Report. Atlanta: ATSDR Division of Toxicology.
2. -. 2003b. CERCLA Priority List of Hazardous Substances. Atlanta: ATSDR.
3. Anderson, B., C. Thompson, and W. A. Suk. 2002. "The Superfund Basic Research Program - Making a Difference: Past, Present, and Future." International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 205(1-2):137-141.
4. Andrews, R. N. L. 1999. Managing the Environment, Managing Ourselves. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5. Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials. 1998. State Cleanup Accomplishments for the Period 1993-1997. Washington, DC: ASTSWMO.
6. Baumol, W. J., and W. E. Oates. 1988. The Theory of Environmental Policy. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bove, F., Y. Shim, and P. Zeitz. 2002. "Drinking Water Contaminants and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Review." Environmental Health Perspectives 110:61-74.
8. Brown, R. S. 2001. States Put Their Money Where Their Environment Is. Washington, DC: Environmental Council of the States (ECOS).
9. Congressional Budget Office. 1994. The Total Costs of Cleaning Up Nonfederal Superfund Sites. Washington, DC.: Congressional Budget Office.
10. Dolk, H., and M. Vrijheid. 2003. "The impact of environmental pollution on congenital anomalies." British Medical Bulletin 68:25-45.
11. Environmental Law Institute. 1998. An Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50 State Study, 1998 Update. Washington, DC.
12. -. 2002. An Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50 State Study, 2001 Update. Washington, DC.
13. Science Advisory Board. 1990. Review of the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
14. Fung, A., and D. O'Rourke. 2000. "Reinventing Environmental Regulation From the Grassroots Up: Explaining and Expanding the Success of the Toxics Release Inventory." Environmental Management 25(2):115-127.
15. General Accounting Office. 1995. Superfund: Information on Current Health Risks. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
16. -. 1998a. Hazardous Waste Sites: State Cleanup Practices. Washington DC: General Accounting Office.
17. -. 1998b. Hazardous Waste: Unaddressed Risks at Many Potential Superfund Sites. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
18. -. 1999. Superfund: Progress, Problems, and Future Outlook. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
19. Hamilton, J. T. 1995. "Pollution as News - Media and Stock-Market Reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory Data." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28(1):98-113.
20. Hamilton, J. T., and W. K. Viscusi. 1999. "Calculating Risks? The Spatial and Political Dimensions of Hazardous Waste Policy." In Regulation of Economic Activity, N. L. Rose and R. Schmalensee, eds. Cambridge: MIT Press.
21. Harrison, R. M. 2003. "Hazardous Waste Landfill Sites and Congenital Anomalies: Where Do We Go From Here?" Occupational and Environmental Medicine 60(2):79-80.
22. Hays, S. P. 1987. "Beauty, Heath, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955-85." In Studies in Environment and History, D. Worster and A. Crosby, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Hird, J. A. 1994. Superfund: The Political Economy of Environmental Risk, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24. Johnson, B. L. 1999. Impact of Hazardous Waste on Human Health: Hazard, Health Effects, Equity, and Communications Issues. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.
25. Jung, C, K. Krutilla, and R. Boyd. 1996. "Incentives for Advanced Pollution Control Abatement Technology at the Industry Level: An Evaluation of Policy Alternatives." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30(1):95-111.
26. Khoury, G. A., and G. L. Diamond. 2003. "Risks to Children from Exposure to Lead in Air During Remedial or Removal Activities at Superfund Sites: A Case Study of the RSR Lead Smelter Superfund Site." Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology 13(1):51-65.
27. King, G. 2002. Letter to Michael B. Cook, Director of the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. Washington, DC: Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials.
28. Konar, S., and M. A. Cohen. 1997. "Information as Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32(1):109-124.
29. Koshland, D. E. 1991. "Toxic-Chemicals and Toxic Laws." Science 253(5023):949-949.
30. Landy, M. K., M. J. Roberts, and S. R. Thomas. 1994. The Environmental Protection Agency: Asking the Wrong Questions from Nixon to Clinton. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. National Conference of State Legislatures. 2004. "Superfund Reform Policy." Washington, DC: NCSL.
32. National Governors Association. 2003. "Policy Position: Superfund Policy." Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A). Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
33. -. 1990. National Contingency Plan. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
34. Office of Management and Budget. 2003. Performance and Management Assessments. Washington, DC.
35. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 1990. Superfund Removal Procedures Action Memorandum Guidance. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
36. -. 1998. RCRA, Superfund & EPCRA Hotline Training Module: Introduction to Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
37. Office of Technology Assessment. 1989. Coming Clean: Superfund Problems Can Be Solved. Washington, DC: U. S. Congress.
38. Orr, L. 1976. "Incentive for Innovation as the Basis for Effluent Charge Strategy." American Economic Review 66(2):441-447.
39. President of the United States. 1994. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority and Low-Income Populations.
40. -. 1999. Executive Order 13132: Federalism.
41. -. 2000. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments.
42. Probst, K. N., D. Fullerton, R. E. Litan, and P. R. Portney. 1995. Footing the Bill for Superfund Cleanup: Who Pays and How? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and RFF Press.
43. Probst, K. N. and D. M. Konisky. 2001. Superfund's Future: What Will It Cost? Washington, DC: RFF Press.
44. RCRA/CERCLA Division. 1993. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS): Process, Elements and Techniques. Edited by Office of Environmental Guidance. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Energy.
45. Sheldrake, S., and M. Stifelman. 2003. "A Case Study of Lead Contamination Cleanup Effectiveness at Bunker Hill." Science of the Total Environment 303(1-2):105-123.
46. Taylor, M. R., E. S. Rubin, and D. A. Hounshell. 2003. "Effect of Government Actions on Technological Innovation for S02 Control." Environmental Science & Technology 37(20):4527-4534.
47. Traceski, T. T. 1994. Environmental Guidance on CERCLA Removal Actions, Washington, DC: Office of Environmental Guidance.
48. -. 1995. Baseline Risk Assessment: Toxicity and Exposure Assessment and Risk Characterization. Washington, DC: Office of Environmental Policy and Assistance.
49. - Statement of the Commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services on Superfund on Behalf of the Environmental Council of the States. Washington, DC.
50. von Lindern, I., S. Spalinger, V. Petroysan, and M. von Braun. 2003. "Assessing Remedial Effectiveness Through the Blood Lead: Soil/Dust Lead Relationship at the Bunker Hill Superfund Site in the Silver Valley of Idaho." Science of the Total Environment 303(1-2):139-170.
51. Wildavsky, A. 1995. But Is It True? A Citizen's Guide to Environmental Health and Safety Issues. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.