Validation of statistical shape model based reconstruction of the proximal femur-A morphology study

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 638-644

  Schumann, Steffen ^a   Tannast, Moritz ^a   Nolte, Lutz P ^a   Zheng, Guoyan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Morphology; Proximal femur; Reconstruction; Statistical shape model; Validation; X ray radiograph

Indexed keywords

CT-SCAN; GROUND TRUTH; MEASURED PARAMETERS; MORPHOMETRIC PARAMETERS; PARAMETER RANGE; PROXIMAL FEMUR; RECONSTRUCTED SURFACES; RECONSTRUCTION; RECONSTRUCTION ACCURACY; RECONSTRUCTION METHOD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SHAPE MODEL; SURFACE MODELS; SURFACE-BASED; VALIDATION STUDY;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ERRORS; MORPHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPAIR; STATISTICS; TWO DIMENSIONAL; X RAYS;

BONE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MEASUREMENT; MODEL; MORPHOMETRICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; X RAY; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; PROBABILITY; RADIOGRAPHY; VALIDATION STUDY;

FEMUR; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PROBABILITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77954033873     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barratt D.C., Chan C.S., Edwards P.J., Penney G.P., Slomczykowski M., Carter T.J., et al. Instantiation and registration of statistical shape models of the femur and pelvis using 3D ultrasound imaging. Med Image Anal 2008, 12:358-374.
2. Benameur S., Mignotte M., Parent S., Labelle H., Skalli W., de Guise J. 3D/2D registration and segmentation of scoliotic vertebrae using statistical models. Comput Med Imag Graph 2003, 27:321-337.
3. Blanz V., Mehl A., Vetter T., Seidel H.P. A statistical method for robust 3D surface reconstruction from sparse data. International symposium on 3D data processing, visualization and transmission 2004, 293-300.
4. Fleute M., Lavallée S. Building a complete surface model from sparse data using statistical shape model. Lect Notes Comput Sci 1998, 1496:879-887.
5. Rajamani K.T., Styner M.A., Talib H., Zheng G., Nolte L.P., Gonzáles Ballester M.A. Statistical deformable bone models for robust 3D surface extrapolation from sparse data. Med Image Anal 2007, 11:99-109.
6. Stindel E., Briard J.L., Merloz P., Plaweski S., Dubrana F., Lefevre C., et al. Bone morphing: 3D morphological data for total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aid Surg 2002, 7:156-168.
7. Zheng G., Gonzáles Ballester M.A., Styner M., Nolte L.P. Reconstruction of patient-specific 3d bone surface from 2d calibrated fluoroscopic images and point distribution model. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2006, 4190:25-32.
8. Zheng G., Schumann S. 3D reconstruction of a patient-specific surface model of the proximal femur from calibrated X-ray radiographs: a validation study. Med Phys 2009, 36:1155-1166.
9. Behiels G., Maes F., Vandermeulen D., Suetens P. Evaluation of image features and search strategies for segmentation of bone structures in radiographs using active shape models. Med Image Anal 2002, 6:47-62.
10. Heimann T., Meinzer H.P. Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: a review. Med Image Anal 2009, 13:543-563.
11. Lamecker H., Seebass M., Hege H.C., Deuflhard P. A 3D statistical shape model of the pelvic bone for segmentation. Proc. SPIE medical imaging 2004, 5370.
12. Tang T.S., Ellis R.E. 2D/3D deformable registration using a hybrid atlas. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2005, 3750.
13. Baldwin M.A., Langenderfer J.E., Rullkoetter P.J., Laz P.J. Development of subject-specific and statistical shape models of the knee using an efficient segmentation and mesh-morphing approach. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2009.
14. Bryan R., Nair P.B., Taylor M. Use of a statistical model of the whole femur in a large scale, multi-model study of femoral neck fracture risk. J Biomech 2009, 42:2171-2176.
15. Noble P.C., Alexander J.W., Lindahl L.J., Yew D.T., Granberry W.M., Tullos H.S. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 235:148-165.
16. Noble P.C., Box G.G., Kamaric E., Fink M.J., Alexander J.W., Tullos H.S. The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995, 316:31-44.
17. Noble P.C., Kamaric M.S., Sugano N., Matsubara M., Harada Y., Ohzono K., et al. The three-dimensional shape of the dysplastic femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 417:27-40.
18. Rubin P.J., Leyvraz P.F., Aubaniac J.M., Argenson J.N., Estève P., de Roguin B. The morphology of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992, 74-B:28-32.
19. Sugano N., Noble P.C., Kamaric E., Salama J.K., Ochi T., Tullos H.S. The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80-B:711-719.
20. Steppacher S.D., Tannast M., Werlen S., Siebenrock A. Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:782-790.
21. Mahaisavariya B., Sitthiseripratip K., Tongdee T., Bohez E.L., Sloten J.V., Oris P. Morphological study of the proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering. Med Eng Phys 2002, 24:617-622.
22. Cootes T.F., Taylor C.J., Cooper D.H., Graham J. Active shape models-their training and applications. Comput Vis Image Understand 1995, 61(2):38-59.
23. Davies R.H., Twining C.J., Cootes T.F., Waterton J.C., Taylor C.J. A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modelling. Trans Med Imag 2002, 21(5).
24. Schumann S., Zheng G., Nolte L.P. Calibration of X-ray radiographs and its feasible application for 2D/3D reconstruction of the proximal femur. Proc EMBS international conference 2008 2008.
25. Besl P.J., McKay N.D. A method for registration of 3D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1992, 14(2).
26. Robertson D.D., Essinger J.R., Imura S., Kuroki Y., Sakamaki T., Shimizu T., et al. Femoral deformity in adults with developmental hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, 327:196-206.
27. Bradford Hill A. Principles of medical statistics 1971, The Lancet Ltd., London, p. 90. 9th ed.
28. Looney S.W., Gulledge T.R. Use of correlation coefficient with normal probability plots. Am Stat 1985, 39:75-79.
29. Welch B.L. The generalization of 'student's' problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 1947, 34:28-35.