Reinforcing and expanding the predictions of the disturbance vicariance hypothesis in Amazonian harlequin frogs: A molecular phylogenetic and climate envelope modelling approach

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2125-2146

  Lötters, Stefan ^a,b   van der Meijden, Arie ^a,b,c   Rödder, Dennis ^a   Köster, Timo E ^d   Kraus, Tanja ^e   La Marca, Enrique ^f   Haddad, Célio F B ^g   Veith, Michael ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c CENTRO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO EM BIODIVERSIDADE E RECURSOS GENÉTICOS   (Portugal)

^d JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

^f FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS   (Venezuela)

^g SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Atelopus; Bayesian inference; Bioclimate; MaxEnt; Maximum likelihood; Ripley's K function; South America

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BIOCLIMATOLOGY; CLIMATE CONDITIONS; CLIMATE MODELING; DIVERGENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; FROG; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); VICARIANCE;

AMAZONIA;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; ATELOPUS; LYSAPSUS;

EID: 77954033215     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-010-9869-y     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Antonelli A, Nylander JAA, Persson C, Sanmartín I (2009) Tracing the impact of the Andean uplift on Neotropical plant evolution. PNAS 106: 9749-9754.
2. Ardila-R MC, Ruiz-C PM (1997) Herpetología (anfibios/reptiles). In: Botero PJ (ed) Zonificación ambiental para el plan modelo Colombo-Brasilero (Eje Apaporis-Tabatinga: PAT). Editorial Linotipia Bolívar, Bogotá.
3. Asquith A, Altig R (1987) Anura. Atelopus spumarius. Vocalization. Herp Rev 18: 32-33.
4. Atteslander P (2008) Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, 10th edn. W. de Gruyter, Berlin.
5. Bärtschi A, MacQuarrie K (2001) Where the Andes meet the Amazon. Peru and Bolivia's Bahuaja-Sonene and Madidi National Parks. Patthey and Sons, Barcelona.
6. Benson DA, Karsch-Mitzrachi I, Lippman DJ et al (2004) GenBank: update. Nucl Acid Res 32: 23-26.
7. Broennimann O, Treier UA, Müller-Schärer H et al (2007) Evidence of climatic nich shift during biological invasion. Ecol Lett 10: 701-709.
8. Bruford MW, Hanotte O, Brookfield JFY, Burke T (1992) Single-locus and multilocus DNA fingerprinting. In: Hoezel AR (ed) Molecular genetic analysis in conservation. IRL Press, Oxford.
9. Bush MB (1994) Amazonian speciation: a necessarily complex model. J Biogeogr 21: 5-17.
10. Carnaval AC, Moritz C (2008) Historical climate modelling predicts patterns of current biodiversity in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. J Biogeogr 35: 1187-1201.
11. Duellman WE, Mendelson JR III (1995) Amphibians and reptiles from northern Departamento Loreto, Peru: taxonomy and biogeography. Univ Kans Sci Bull 55: 329-376.
12. Duellman WE, Salas AW (1991) Annotated checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Cuzco Amazonico, Peru. Occ Pap Mus Nat Hist Univ Kans 143: 1-13.
13. Duellman WE, Thomas R (1996) Anuran amphibians from a seasonally dry forest in southeastern Peru and comparisons among sites in the upper Amazon basin. Occ Pap Mus Nat Hist Univ Kans 180: 1-34.
14. Dutech C, Maggia L, Tardy C, Joly HI, Jarne P (2003) Tracking a genetic signal of extinction-recolonization events in a Neotropical tree species: Vouacapoua americana Aublet in French Guiana. Evolution 57: 2753-2764.
15. Elith J, Graham CH (2009) Do they? How do they? Why do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performance of species distribution models. Ecography 32: 66-77.
16. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson P et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29: 129-151.
17. Figueiredo J, Hoorn C, van der Ven P, Soares E (2009) Late Miocene onset of the Amazon River and the Amazon deep-sea fan: evidence from the Foz do Amazonas Basin. Geology 37: 619-622.
18. Gascon C (1989) The tadpole of Atelopus pulcher Boulenger (Annura [sic!], Bufonidae) from Manaus, Amazonas. Rev bras Zool 6: 235-239.
19. Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52: 696-704.
20. Haase P (1995) Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based Ripley's K-functions: introduction and methods for edge correction. J Veg Sci 6: 757-782.
21. Haffer J (1997) Alternative models of vertebrate speciation in Amazonia: an overview. Biodivers Conserv 6: 451-476.
22. Haffer J (2008) Hypotheses to explain the origin of species in Amazonia. Braz J Biol 68: 917-947.
23. Hall JPW, Harvey DJ (2002) The phylogeography of Amazonia revisited: new evidence from riodinid butterflies. Evolution 56: 1489-1497.
24. Hanley J, McNeil B (1982) The meaning of the use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143: 29-36.
25. Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Araùjo MB et al (2006) Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Progr Phys Geogr 30: 751-777.
26. Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL, Albert DL (2006) The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 29: 773-785.
27. Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Cruz M, Rojas E (2001) Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS. Plant Gen Resour Newsl 127: 15-19.
28. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL et al (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climatic surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climat 25: 1965-1978.
29. Hill LL, Zheng Q (1999) Indirect geospatial referencing through place names in the digital library: Alexandria Digital Library experience with developing and implementing gazetteers. Proc Amer Soc Inform Sci 1999: 57-69.
30. Holt RD, Gomulkiewicz R (2004) Conservation implication of niche conservatism and evolution in heterogeneous environments. In: Ferriere R, Dieckmann U, Couvet D (eds) Evolutionary conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
31. Holt RD, Barfield M, Gomulkiewicz R (2005) Theories of niche conservatism and evolution: could exotic species be potential tests? In: Sax D, Stachowicz J, Gaines SD (eds) Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution, and biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
32. Hoogmoed MS, Avila-Pires TCS (1991) Annotated checklist of the herpetofauna of Petiti Saut, Sinnamary River, French Guiana. Zool Mededel 65: 53-88.
33. Hoorn C (2006) The birth of the mighty Amazon. Sci Amer 294: 52-59.
34. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
35. Jakob SS, Heibl C, Rödder D, Blattner FR (2010) Population demography influences climatic niche evolution: evidence from diploid American Hordeum species (Poaceae). Mol Ecol 19: 1423-1438.
36. Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys Rev 106: 620-630.
37. Köhler J, Lötters S (1999) Annotated list of amphibian records from the Departamento Pando, Bolivia, with description of some advertisement calls. Bonn zool Beitr 48: 259-273.
38. Kok PJR (2000) A survey of the anuran fauna of Montagne Belvédère, county of Saül, French Guiana: field list with comments on taxonomy and ecology. Brit Herp Soc Bull 71: 6-26.
39. La Marca E, Lips KR, Lötters S, Puschendorf R, Ibáñez R, Rueda-Almonacid JV, Schulte R, Marty C, Castro F, Manzanilla-Puppo J, García-Pérez JE, Bolaños F, Chaves G, Pounds JA, Toral E, Young BE (2005) Catastrophic population declines and extinctions in Neotropical harlequin frogs (Bufonidae: Atelopus). Biotropica 37: 190-201.
40. Lehr E (2002) Amphibien und Reptilien in Peru. Natur- und Tier-Verlag, Münster.
41. Lescure J (1973 "1972") Contribution à l'étude des amphibiens de Guyane française. I. Notes sur Atelopus flavescens Duméril et Bibron et description d'une nouvelle espèce. Vie Milieu 23: 125-141.
42. Lescure J (1976) Contribution à l'étude des amphibiens de Guyane française. VI. Liste préliminaire des anoures. Bull Mus Nat Hist Nat Paris 265: 475-525.
43. Lescure J (1981a) Contribution à l'étude des amphibiens de Guyane française. VIII. Validation d'Atelopus spumarius Cope, 1871, et désignation d'un néotype. Description d'Atelopus spumarius barbotini nov. ssp. Donées étho-écologiques et biogéographiques sur les Atelopus du groupe flavescens (anoures, bufonidés). Bull Mus Nat Hist Nat Paris (sér. 4) 3: 893-910.
44. Lescure J (1981b) Reference à l'étude des amphibiens de Guyane française. IX. Le têtard gastromyzophore d'Atelopus flavescens Duméril et Bibron (Anura, Bufonidae). Amphib-Reptil 2: 209-215.
45. Lescure J, Gasc JP (1986) Partage de l'espace forestier par les amphibiens et les reptiles en Amazonie du nord-ouest. Caldasia 15: 707-723.
46. Lobo JM, Jiménez-Valverde A, Real R (2008) AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17: 145-151.
47. Lötters S (1996) The neotropical toad genus Atelopus. Checklist-biology-distribution. Vences and Glaw, Cologne.
48. Lötters S, Haas W, Schick S, Böhme W (2002) On the systematics of the harlequin frogs (Amphibia: Bufonidae: Atelopus) from Amazonia. II: redescription of Atelopus pulcher (Boulenger, 1882) from the eastern Andean versant in Peru. Salamandra 38: 165-184.
49. McDiarmid RW (1971) Comparative morphology and evolution of frogs of the Neotropical genera Atelopus, Dendrophryniscus, Melanophryniscus, and Oreophrynella. Sci Bull Los Angeles Co Mus Nat Hist 12: 1-66.
50. McDiarmid RW (1973) A new species of Atelopus (Anura, Bufonidae) from northeastern South America. Contrib Sci 240: 1-12.
51. Noonan BP, Gaucher P (2005) Phylogeography and demography of Guianan harlequin toads (Atelopus): diversification within a refuge. Mol Ecol 14: 3017-3031.
52. Noonan BP, Gaucher P (2006) Refugial isolation and secondary contact in the dyeing poison frog Dendrobates tinctorius. Mol Ecol 15: 4425-4435.
53. Noonan BP, Wray KP (2006) Neotropical diversification: the effects of a complex history on diversity within the poison frog genus Dendrobates. J Biogeogr 33: 1007-1020.
54. Palumbi S, Martin A, Romano S, McMillan WO, Stice L, Grabowski G (1991) The simple fool's guide to PCR. Version 2. Privately published document compiled by S. Palumbi. Department of Zoology, University Hawaii. Honolulu.
55. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37: 637-669.
56. Patzelt E (1989) Fauna del Ecuador. Banco Central del Ecuador, Quito.
57. Pearman PB, Guisan A, Broennimann O, Randin CF (2007) Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 149-158.
58. Peterson AT, Soberón J, Sánchez-Cordero V (1999) Conservation of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285: 1265-1267.
59. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Shapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190: 231-259.
60. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinform 14: 817-818.
61. Ripley BD (1977) Modelling spatial patterns (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 39: 172-212.
62. Rivero JA (1968) More on the Atelopus (Amphibia, Salientia) from western South America. Carib J Sci 8: 19-29.
63. Rödder D, Lötters S (2009) Niche shift or niche conservatism? Climatic properties of the native and invasive range of the Mediterranean Housegecko Hemidactylus turcicus. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 18: 674-687.
64. Rödder D, Schmidtlein S, Veith M, Lötters S (2009) Alien invasive Slider turtle in unpredicted habitat: a matter of niche shift or predictors studied? PLoS ONE 4: e7843. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0007843.
65. Rodríguez LO (1992) Structure et organization du peuplement d'anoures de Cocha Cashu, Parc nacional Manu, Amazonie péruvienne. Rev Ecol 47: 151-197.
66. Rodríguez LO, Duellman WE (1994) Guide to the frogs of the Iquitos region, Amazonian Peru. Spec Pap Mus Nat Hist Univ Kans 22: 1-80 + plates 1-12.
67. Santos JC, Coloma LA, Summers K, Caldwell JP, Ree R, Cannatella DC (2008) Amazonian amphibian diversity is primarily derived from late Miocene Andean lineages. PLoS Biol 7: e1000056.
68. Schlüter A (2005) Amphibien an einem Stillgewässer in Peru. Chimaira, Frankfurt/Main.
69. Swets K (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240: 1285-1293.
70. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of the progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl Acid Res 22: 4673-4680.
71. van der Meijden A, Boistel R, Gerlach J et al (2007) Molecular phylogenetic evidence for paraphyly of the genus Sooglossus, with the description of a new genus of Seychellean frogs. Biol J Linn Soc 91: 347-359.
72. Vences M, Thomas M, van der Meijden A et al (2005) Comparative performance of the 16S rRNA gene in DNA barcoding of amphibians. Front Zool 2: 5.
73. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2008) Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62: 2868-2883.
74. Wiens JJ, Graham CH (2005) Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 36: 519-539.
75. Wisz MS, Hijmans RJ, Peterson AT et al (2008) Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers Distrib 14: 763-773.