Reproducibility of rasterstereography for kyphotic and lordotic angles, trunk length, and trunk inclination: A reliability study

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 14, 2010, Pages 1353-1358

  Melvin, Mohokum ^a   Sylvia, Mendoza ^a   Udo, Wolf ^a   Helmut, Sitter ^b   Paletta, Jürgen R ^c   Adrian, Skwara ^c  

^a Department of Physical Therapy ^*  (United States)

^b Institute of Theoretical Surgery   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Body mass index; Rasterstereography; Reliability; Spine deformity; Surface topography

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY POSTURE; BODY SURFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EVALUATION AND FOLLOW UP; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RASTERSTEREOGRAPHY; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STANDING; STEREORADIOGRAPHY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TRUNK; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BODY MASS INDEX; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; MALE; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPINE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954031764     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cbc157     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Betsch M. Entwicklung einer Messmethode zur berührungslosen Erfassung von Haltungsparametern der Wirbelsäule unter dynamischen Bedingungen. Dissertation. University Tuebingen; 2008:1-111.
2. Klos SS, Liu XC, Lyon RM, et al. Reliability of a functional classification system in the monitoring of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007; 32:1662-1666
3. Bradford D. Adult scoliosis: current concepts and treatment. Clin Orthoped 1988;229:70-87.
4. Hoffman DA, Lonstein JE, Morin MM, et al. Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic X rays. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81: 1307-1312
5. Kalmar JA, Jones JP, Merritt CR. Low-dose radiography of scoliosis in children. A comparison of methods. Spine 1994;19:818-823
6. Kushner DC, Cleveland RH, Herman TE, et al. Radiation dose reduction in the evaluation of scoliosis: an application of digital radiography. Radiology 1986;161:175-181
7. Levy AR, Goldberg MS, Hanley JA, et al. Projecting the lifetime risk of cancer from exposure to diagnostic ionizing radiation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Health Phys 1994;66:621-633
8. Nash CL Jr, Gregg EC, Brown RH, et al. Risks of exposure to X-rays in patients undergoing long-term treatment for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61:371-374
9. Hackenberg L, Hierholzer E, Potzl W, et al. Rasterstereographic back shape analysis in idiopathic scoliosis after anterior correction and fusion. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18:1-8. (Pubitemid 36071315)
10. Drerup B, Hierholzer E. Back shape measurement using video rasterstereography and three-dimensional reconstruction of spinal shape. Clin Biomech 1994;9:28-36.
11. Stokes IA, Moreland MS. Measurement of the shape of the surface of the back in patients with scoliosis. The standing and forward-bending positions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:203-211
12. Stokes IA, Moreland MS. Concordance of back surface asymmetry and spine shape in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1989;14:73-78
13. Theologis TN, Fairbank JC, Turner-Smith AR, et al. Early detection of progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by measurement of changes in back shape with the Integrated Shape Imaging System scanner. Spine 1997; 22:1223-1227, discussion 8.
14. Hackenberg L, Hierholzer E, Potzl W, et al. Rasterstereographic back shape analysis in idiopathic scoliosis after posterior correction and fusion. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18:883-889 (Pubitemid 37324356)
15. Drerup B, Hierholzer E. Objective determination of anatomical landmarks on the body surface: measurement of the vertebra prominens from surface curvature. J Biomech 1985;18:467-474
16. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry: report of a WHO expert committee. WHO Tech Rep Ser 1995;854:1-452.
17. Drerup B, Hierholzer E. Automatic localization of anatomical landmarks on the back surface and construction of a body-fixed coordinate system. J Biomech 1987;20:961-970
18. Goh S, Price R, Leedmann P, Singer K. Rasterstereographic analysis of the thoracic sagittale curvature: a relaibility study. J Musculoskelet Res 1999;4: 137-142
19. Hackenberg L, Hierholzer E, Bullmann V, et al. Rasterstereographic analysis of axial back surface rotation in standing versus forward bending posture in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2006;15:1144-1149
20. Gille O, Champain N, Benchikh-El-Fegoun A, et al. Reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients. Spine 2007;32:568-573
21. Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, et al. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1587-1592