The effect of audience design on labeling, organizing, and finding shared files

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 777-786

  Rader, Emilee ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

audience design; common ground; file labeling and organizing; group information management

Indexed keywords

AUDIENCE DESIGN; COMMON GROUND; COMMUNICATION PROCESS; FILE LABELING AND ORGANIZING; FOLDER HIERARCHY; ONLINE EXPERIMENT;

DESIGN; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; LABELING;

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

EID: 77954011571     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753440     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. L. M. Berlin, R. Jeffries, V. L. O'Day, A. Paepcke, and C. Wharton. Where did you put it? Issues in the design and use of a group memory. In CHI '93, pages 23-30, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993. ACM Press.
2. B. M. Bolker, M. E. Brooks, C. J. Clark, S. W. Geange, J. R. Poulsen, M. H. H. Stevens, and J.-S. S. White. Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24(3):127-135, 2009.
3. A. L. Byers, H. Allore, T. M. Gill, and P. N. Peduzzi. Application of negative binomial modeling for discrete outcomes: A case study in aging research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(6):559-564, 2003.
4. J. M. Carroll. The role of context in creating names. Discourse Processes, 3(1):1-24, 1980.
5. H. H. Clark and S. E. Brennan. Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley, editors, Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, pages 127-149. APA, Washington DC, 1991.
6. S. R. Fussell and R. M. Krauss. The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(3):203-219, 1989.
7. D. N. Gujarati. Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 4th edition, 2003.
8. G. Mark and W. Prinz. What happened to our document in the shared workspace? the need for groupware conventions. In IFIP TC13 Int'l Conf. on HCI, pages 413-420, 1997.
9. M. L. Markus. Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. J MIS, 18(1):57-93, 2001.
10. R. S. Nickerson. How we know - and sometimes misjudge - what others know: imputing one's own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6):737-759, 1999.
11. R. S. Nickerson. The projective way of knowing: A useful heuristic that sometimes misleads. CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, 10(5):168-172, 2001.
12. P. Pirolli. Rational analyses of information foraging on the web. Cognitive Science, 29(3):343-373, 2005.
13. E. Rader. Yours, mine and (not) ours: Social influences on group information repositories. In CHI '09, pages 2095-2098, 2009.
14. N. S. Shami, K. Ehrlich, G. Gay, and J. T. Hancock. Making sense of strangers' expertise from signals in digital artifacts. In CHI '09, pages 69-78, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
15. J. C. Tang, C. Drews, M. Smith, F. Wu, A. Sue, and T. Lau. Exploring patterns of social commonality among file directories at work. In CHI '07, pages 951-960, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
16. G. Verbeke and E. Lesaffre. A linear mixed-effects model with heterogeneity in the random-effects population. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(433):217-221, 1996. (Pubitemid 126353382)
17. S. Voida, W. K. Edwards, M. W. Newman, R. E. Grinter, and N. Ducheneaut. Share and share alike: exploring the user interface affordances of file sharing. In CHI '06, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2006.
18. T. Whalen, E. G. Toms, and J. Blustein. Information displays for managing shared files. In CHiMiT '08, pages 1-10, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.