Designing storm-water controls to promote sustainable ecosystems: Science and application

Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 504-511

  Palhegyi, Gary E ^a  

^a ENTRIX   (United States)

Author keywords

Effective design approach; Erosion potential; Flow duration control; Geomorphology; Hydromodification; Low impact development; Sustainable solutions; Work index

Indexed keywords

DESIGN APPROACHES; EROSION POTENTIALS; FLOW DURATION; FLOW DURATION CONTROL; LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION;

DECISION MAKING; GEOMORPHOLOGY; HYDROLOGY; LANDFORMS; STORMS; WATER;

DESIGN;

DECISION MAKING; DESIGN; EROSION; FLOW CONTROL; GEOMORPHOLOGY; HYDROGEOLOGY; STORMWATER; STREAM CHANNEL; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 77954005072     PISSN: 10840699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000130     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Hydrograph modification management plan 2007, Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program (ACCWP), ., Alameda County Public Works Agency, Alameda, Calif.
2. Annear T. Instream flows for riverine resource stewardship 2004 Instream Flow Council, Cheyenne, Wyo.
3. Design and construction of urban storm-water management systems. Manuals and Reports of Engineering Practice No. 77 1992, ASCE ASCE, Reston, Va.
4. Bledsoe B. Watson C. Effects of urbanization on channel instability. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2001a, 37(2):255-270. JWRAF5, 1093-474X, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb00966.x
5. Bledsoe B. Watson C. Logistic analysis of channel pattern thresholds: Meandering, braiding, and incising. Geomorphology 2001b, 38:281-300. GEMPEZ, 0169-555X, 10.1016/S0169-555X(00)00099-4,
6. Booth D. Stream channel incision following drainage basin urbanization. Water Resour. Bull. 1990, 26:407-417. WARBAQ, 0043-1370
7. Booth D. Hartley D. Jackson R. Forest cover, impervious surface area, and the mitigation of storm-water impacts. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2002, 38(3):835-845. JWRAF5, 1093-474X, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb01000.x
8. Booth D. Jackson R. Urbanization of aquatic systems: Degradation thresholds, storm-water detection, and limits of mitigation. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1997, 33(5):1077-1090. JWRAF5, 1093-474X, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb04126.x
9. Draft general NPDES permit for construction activities. General Permit No. CAR000002. 2007, California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Sacramento, Calif.
10. Reducing storm-water costs through low impact development strategies and practices. 2007, EPA Rep. No.EPA 841-F-07-006, EPA, Washington, D.C<> (Nov. 2008).
11. A technical study of hydrology, geomorphology and water quality in the Laguna Creek Watershed 2007, Geosyntec Consultants Upper Laguna Creek Council, Sacramento, Calif.
12. Hanson G.J. Cook K.R. Apparatus, test procedures, and analytical methods to measure soil erodibility in situ. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2004, 20(4):455-462 0883-8542
13. Surface water design manual 1998, King County Seattle Department of Public Works, Water and Land Resources Division, Seattle.
14. Lane W.E. The importance of fluvial morphology in hydraulic engineering. Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1955, 81:1-17. PACEAJ, 0097-417X
15. Leopold L. Wolman M. Miller J. Fluvial processes in geomorphology 1964, and Dover, New York.
16. MacRae C. The role of moderate flow events and bank structure in the determination of channel response to urbanization. Proc45th Annual Conf. of Canadian Water Resources Association 1992, 2.1-12.21. Shrubsole, N.Y.
17. MacRae C. An alternate design approach for the control of in-stream erosion potential in urbanizing watersheds. Proc6th Int. Conf. on Urban Storm Drainage 1993, 2:1086-1098. H. C. Torno, edVolNiagara Falls, Ontario, Canada
18. MacRae C. Experience from morphological research on Canadian streams: Is control of the two-year frequency runoff event the best basis for stream channel protection. ASCE Engineering Foundation Conf. on Effects of Watershed Development and Management on Aquatic Ecosystems 1996, 144-162. Snowbird, Utah
19. Storm-water quality manual for development projects Marin County, guidance for applicants. A low impact development approach. 2008, Marin County Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (MCSTOPPP) MarrfCalif.
20. Nehrke S. Roesner L. Effects of design practice for flood control and best management practices on the flow-frequency curve. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 2004, 130(2):131-139. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:2(131)
21. Palhegyi G. Modeling and sizing bioretention using flow duration control. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2009, JHEND8, 0733-9429 posted online ahead of print Oct. 22, 2009. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000205.
22. Palhegyi G. Potter C. Dean C. Strecker E. Evaluating the effectiveness of flow controls at protecting streams from the effects of hydromodification in urbanizing watersheds. AWRA Annual Water Resource Conf. 2005, , and Seattle.
23. Low-impact development design strategies: An integrated design approach 1999, Prince George's County Prince George's County, Maryland Dept. of Environmental Resources Programs and Planning Division, Marlboro, Md.
24. Rohrer C. Roesner L. Matching the critical portion of the flow duration curve to minimize changes in excess shear. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54(6-7):347-354. WSTED4, 0273-1223, 10.2166/wst.2006.590
25. Hydromodification management plan, Final report. 2005, Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP) Santa Clara, Calif.
26. Soar P.J. Thorne C.R. Channel restoration design for meandering rivers. 2001 Final Rep. No.ERDC/CHL CR-01-1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Miss.