Nanotechnology . . . What Is It Good For? (Absolutely Everything): A Problem Definition Approach

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 255-271

  Lindquist, Eric ^a   Mosher Howe, Katrina N ^a   Liu, Xinsheng ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agenda setting; Nanotechnology; Problem definition

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; COMPLEXITY; DATABASE; MASS MEDIA; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 77954002380     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: 15411338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00441.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Arnall A H. Future technologies, today's choices 2003, London, Greenpeace Environmental Trust
2. Aronson N. Nutrition as a social problem: A case study of entrepreneurial strategy in science. Social Problems 1982, 29(5):474-487.
3. Batt C A. Realizing the potential of nanobiotechnology. Food Technology 2002, 56:31-32.
4. Baumgartner F B, Jones B D. Agendas and instability in American politics 2009, 2nd, ed., Chicago, University of Chicago Press
5. Berger E. Experts discuss nanotechnology for energy crisis: Houston Chronicle. 2003, May 4, http://www.chron.com/, Retrieved July 2007, from
6. Chang J. Venture capital activity heats up in nanotechnology and catalysis. Chemical Market Reporter 2003, June 16, 263:17.
7. Chang K. In study, researchers find nanotubes may pose health risks similar to asbestos: New York Times. 2008, May 21, 22. p.
8. Cohen M D, March J G, Olsen J P. A garbage can model of organizational chaos. Administrative Science Quarterly 1972, 17:1-18.
9. Crow M M, Sarewitz D. 2000, Nanotechnology and societal transformation. Presented at the National Science and Technology Council Workshop on Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
10. Daviter F. Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 2007, 14:654-666.
11. Dean C. Handle with care: New York Times. 2008, August 12, http://www.nytimes.com, Retrieved August 2008, from
12. Drexler K E. Engines of creation: The coming era of nanotechnology 1990, New York, Anchor Books
13. Dunlop C. Up and down the pecking order, what matters and when in issue definition: The case of rbST in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 2007, 14:39-58.
14. Beyond the nanohype. The Economist 2003, March 15, 366:28. Economist.
15. Trouble in nanoland. 2002, December 5, http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?Story_ID=1477445, Economist.com., Retrieved from
16. The big down: From genomes to atoms. 2003, ETC Group., ETC Group
17. Feynman R P. There's plenty of room at the bottom. Engineering Science (Cal Tech) 1960, 23:22-36.
18. Nanotechnology: The next fantastic optical voyage. Fiber Optics News 2003, July 14, 23:1. Fiber Optics News
19. Firn D, Harvey F, Smith P. Will nanotech become the next biotech bubble: Financial Times. 2003, March 19, 13. p.
20. Hilgartner S, Bosk C L. The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology 1988, 94(1):53-78.
21. Joy B. Why the future doesn't need us. 2000, http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html, Retrieved March 7, 2002, from
22. Kim E. Directed evolution: A historical exploration into an evolutionary experimental system of nanobiotechnology, 1965-2006. Minerva 2008, 46:463-484.
23. Kingdon J W. Agendas, alternatives and public policies 1995, 2nd, ed., New York, Harper Collins
24. Kirby A. Nanotech may spark fierce ethical row. 2003, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2758191.stm, Retrieved October 7, 2003, from
25. Knight H, Pierce J. To kill a technology. Engineer 2003, 291:24-29.
26. Kondracke M M. Congress must increase Bush's science budget: Roll Call. 2005, April 25, http://www.rollcall.com, Retrieved July 2007, from
27. Kuennen T. Small science will bring big changes to roads: Better Roads. 2004, July, 20-30. pp.
28. Lane N, Kalil T. The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Present at the creation. Issues in Science and Technology 2005, 21(4):49-54.
29. Lindquist E. Setting the agenda in the transportation policy domain: The rise of intelligent vehicle highway systems. 2002, PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University
30. Lindquist E. Survival and institutionalization of an idea: The rapid rise of intelligent vehicle-highway systems. Review of Policy Research 2006, 23(4):887-902.
31. Mason J. Nano Inc. vs. Nano think. 2003, http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2003/09/02/nanotechnology/print.html, Retrieved September 2, 2003, from
32. McCray W P. Will small be beautiful? Making policies for our nanotech future. History and Technology 2005, 21:177-203.
33. McCray W P. From lab to iPod: A story of discovery and commercialization in the Post-Cold War era. Technology and Culture 2009, 50:68-81.
34. Mutz A. Nanotechnology part one: Taxonomy. 2002, http://www.codesta.com/knowledge/market/nanotech_part_one_taxonomy/index.jsp, Retrieved from
35. Small wonders, endless frontiers: A review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative 2002, National Research Council (NRC), Washington, DC, National Research Council
36. The National Nanotechnology Initiative at five years: Assessment and recommendations of the National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel. 2005, President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology
37. Princen S. Agenda-setting in the European Union: A theoretical exploration and agenda for research. Journal of European Public Policy 2007, 14:21-38.
38. Princen S, Rhinard M. Crashing and creeping: Agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 2006, 13:1119-1132.
39. Raloff J. Big worries about little tubes. Science News 2003, August 20, 164:142.
40. Regalado A. Greenpeace warns of pollutants from nanotechnology: Wall Street Journal. 2003, July 25, B1. p.
41. Rochefort D A, Cobb R W. Problem definition: An emerging perspective. The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda 1994, 1-31. Rochefort D A, Cobb R W. Eds., pp., Lawrence, University Press of Kansas
42. Roco M C. Nanoparticles and nanotechnology research. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 1999, 1:1-6.
43. Roco M C. Presentation at the National Science Foundation Nanotechnology Undergraduate Education review panel meeting. 2007, Arlington, VA, July
44. Roco M C. 2008, Presentation at the National Science Foundation Principal Investigator meeting, Arlington VA, August 28
45. Roco M C, Bainbridge W S. Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology 2001, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers
46. Focus on nanotechnology. 2003, http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/phil_maths/nanotechnology.html, Royal Society U.K., Retrieved October 16, 2003, from
47. Schattschneider E E. The semi-sovereign people 1961, New York, Holt, Reinhart and Winston
48. Schneider A L, Ingram H. Policy design for democracy 1997, Lawrence, University of Kansas Press
49. Selin C. Expectations and the emergence of nanotechnology. Science, Technology and Human Values 2007, 32:196-220.
50. Service R F. Is nanotechnology dangerous? Science 2000, 290:1526-1527.
51. Singer N. New products bring side effects: Nanophobia: New York Times. 2008, December 4, http://www.nyt.com, Retrieved December 2008, from
52. Stix G. Little big science. Scientific American 2001, 285:32.
53. Statement of Dr. Joseph J. Jen, Undersecretary, Research Education and Economics, United States Department of Agriculture. 2005, U.S. House of Representatives. Appropriations Committee, Agriculture Subcommittee
54. Statement of Dr. Raymond L. Orbach, Director of the Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy. 2005, U.S. House of Representatives. Appropriations Committee, Energy and Water Development Subcommittee
55. Statement of Sean Murdock, Executive Director, NanoBusiness Alliance. 2005, U.S. House of Representatives. Science Committee, Research Subcommittee
56. 2004, U.S. Senate. Appropriations Committee, Defense Subcommittee,
57. 2004, U.S. Senate. Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee,
58. 2004, U.S. Senate. Energy and Natural Resources Committee,
59. 2004, U.S. Senate. Judiciary Committee,
60. Clothes for the slob in your life: USA Weekend. 2003, Feb 28-March 2, 12. USA Weekend, p.
61. Effective global transportation in the twenty-first century: A vision document 1999, Volpe Center, Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Transportation
62. Walker J L. Setting the agenda in the U.S. Senate: A theory of problem selection. British Journal of Political Science 1977, 7:3-45.
63. Weiss J A. The powers of problem definition: The case of government paperwork. Policy Sciences 1989, 22:97-121.
64. Weiss R. Nanotech is booming biggest in U.S., report says: Washington Post. 2005, March 28, http://www.washingtonpost.com, Retrieved July 2007, from
65. Wood S, Jones R, Geldart A. The social and economic challenges of nanotechnology 2003, Swindon, UK, Economic and Social Research Council
66. Yonas G, Picraux S T. National needs drivers for nanotechnology. 2000, Presented at the Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Workshop, Arlington, VA