Traceability in viewpoint merging: A model management perspective

Proceedings - The 3rd ACM Int. Workshop on Traceability in Emerging Forms of Software Engineering, TEFSE 2005, Held with the 20th IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. Automated Software Engineering, ASE2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 44-49

  Sabetzadeh, Mehrdad ^a   Easterbrook, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

model management; requirements elicitation; requirements engineering; traceability; viewpoint merging

Indexed keywords

CORE ACTIVITY; MODEL MANAGEMENT; REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION; TRACEABILITY INFORMATION;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; MERGING; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

ENGINEERING;

EID: 77953996803     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1107656.1107667     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. M. Barr and C. Wells. Category Theory for Computing Science. Les Publications CRM, Montréal, third edition, 1999.
2. P. Bernstein. Applying model management to classical meta data problems. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, 2003.
3. P. Bernstein, A. Halevy, and R. Pottinger. A vision for management of complex models. SIGMOD Record, 29(4), 2000.
4. P. Buneman, S. Davidson, and A. Kosky. Theoretical aspects of schema merging. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Extending Database Technology, 1992.
5. P. Darke and G. Shanks. Stakeholder viewpoints in requirements de nition: A framework for understanding viewpoint development approaches. Requirements Engineering, 1(2), 1996.
6. S. Easterbrook. Domain modeling with hierarchies of alternative viewpoints. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, 1993.
7. A. Egyed. A scenario-driven approach to traceability. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, 2001.
8. A. Finkelsetin, J. Kramer, B. Nuseibeh, L. Finkelstein, and M. Goedicke. Viewpoints: A framework for integrating multiple perspectives in system development. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 2(1), 1992.
9. G. Fischer, A. Lemke, R. McCall, and A. Morch. Making argumentation serve design. Design rationale: concepts, techniques, and use, 1996.
10. J. Goguen. A categorical manifesto. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 1(1), 1991.
11. O. Gotel and A. Finkelstein. Contribution structures. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, 1995.
12. O. Gotel and A. Finkelstein. Extended requirements traceability: results of an industrial case study. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, 1997.
13. D. Gross and E. Yu. Dealing with system qualities during design and composition of aspects and modules: an agent and goal-oriented approach. In 1st International Workshop on Traceability in Emerging Forms of Software Engineering, 2002.
14. T. Gruber and D. Russell. Generative design rationale: beyond the record and replay paradigm. Design rationale: concepts, techniques, and use, 1996.
15. S. Melnik. Generic Model Management: Concepts and Algorithms, volume 2967 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
16. S. Melnik, E. Rahm, and P. Bernstein. Rondo: a programming platform for generic model management. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 2003.
17. T. Mens. A state-of-the-art survey on software merging. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(5), 2002.
18. N. F. Noy and M. Musen. Prompt: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. In Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Arti cial Intelligence, 2000.
19. R. Pottinger and P. Bernstein. Merging models based on given correspondences. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 2003.
20. D. Ross. Applications and extensions of SADT. IEEE Computer, 18(4), 1985.
21. M. Sabetzadeh and S. Easterbrook. Analysis of inconsistency in graph-based viewpoints: A category-theoretic approach. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003.
22. M. Sabetzadeh and S. Easterbrook. An algebraic framework for merging incomplete and inconsistent views. In Proceedings of the 13th International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2005.
23. M. Sabetzadeh and S. Easterbrook. iVuBlender: A tool for merging incomplete and inconsistent views. In Proceedings of the 13th International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2005. Tool Demo Paper.
24. R. Stamper. Social norms in requirements analysis: an outline of measur. Requirements engineering: social and technical issues, 1994.
25. S. Uchitel and M. Chechik. Merging partial behavioural models. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, 2004.