Software engineering practice versus evidence-based software engineering research

Proceedings of the 2005 Workshop on Realising Evidence-Based Software Engineering, REBSE '05

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Rainer, Austen ^a   Jagielska, Dorota ^a   Hall, Tracy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

adoption; evaluation; evidence; persuasion strategies

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; EVIDENCE BASED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; PERSUASION STRATEGY; RESEARCH COMMUNITIES; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PRACTICES;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

EID: 77953986711     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1083174.1083177     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Basili, V.R. and Rombach, H.D. The TAME Project: Towards Improvement-Oriented Software Environments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 14 (6). 758-773, 1988. (Pubitemid 18640017)
2. Bhattacherjee, A. and Sanford, C. Persuasion strategies for information technology usage: an elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quarterly, In review.
3. DTI, DTI's Office of Science and Technology's Public Engagement with Science and Technology, Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), http://www.dti.gov.uk/ost/ostbusiness/puset/puset.htm, 18th February 2005, 2005
4. Dybå, T., Kitchenham, B. and Jorgensen Evidence-Based Software Engineering for Practitioners. IEEE Software, 22 (1). 58-65, 2005. (Pubitemid 40714956)
5. Fenton, N. and Ohlsson, N. Quantitative Analysis of Faults and Failures in a Complex Software System. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26 (8). 797-814, 2000.
6. Fisher, A. The Logic of Real Arguments. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
7. Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L., Pickard, L., Jones, P., Hoaglin, D.C. and Rosenberg, J. Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28 (8). 721-734, 2002.
8. McCroskey, J.C. An introduction to rhetorical communication. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1997.
9. Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B. and Weber, C.V. Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1. IEEE Software, 10 (4). 18-27, 1993.
10. Paulk, M.C., Goldenson, D. and White, D.M. The 1999 Survey of High Maturity Organizations, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2000.
11. Perloff The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st Century. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., 2003.
12. Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. The elaboration liklehood model of persuasion. Advances in experimental social psychology, 19, 1986.
13. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., Strathman, A.J. and Priester, J.R. To think or not to think: exploring two routes to persuasion. In Shavitt, S. and Brock, T.C. eds. Persuasion: psychological insight and perspectives, 1994.
14. Petty, R.E. and Wegener, D.T. The elaboration liklihood model: current status and controversies. In Chaiken, S. and Trope, Y. eds. Dua-process theories in social psychology, The Guildford Press, New York, 1999, 41-72.
15. Rainer, A. and Hall, T., Identifying the causes of poor progress in software projects. In 10th International Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS'04), (2004).
16. Rainer, A.W. An Empirical Investigation of Software Schedule Behaviour. PhD Thesis, Department of Computing, Bournemouth University
17. Rainer, A.W., Hall, T. and Baddoo, N., Persuading developers to 'buy into' software process improvement: an exploratory analysis. In ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineeing (ISESE), (University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Italy, September 30th - October 1st 2003, 2003).
18. Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, 1995.
19. Williams, L. On the need for a process for making reliable quality comparisons with industrial data. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 29 (5), 2004.