Gluteal-sparing approach for posterior iliac crest bone graft: Description of a new technique and assessment of morbidity in ninety-two patients after spinal fusion

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 14, 2010, Pages 1396-1400

  Merritt, Andrew L ^a   Spinnicke, Anthony ^a   Pettigrew, Kate ^a   Alamin, Todd F ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Grafting technique; Iliac crest bone graft; Morbidity; Postoperative outcome

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN 2;

ADULT; AGED; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; BONE PAIN; CHRONIC PAIN; CLUNEAL NERVE INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEBRIDEMENT; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DONOR SITE; EPIDURAL HEMATOMA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE NONUNION; GLUTEUS MAXIMUS MUSCLE; GRAFT INFECTION; HUMAN; ILIAC BONE; ILIAC CREST; INTERVIEW; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; NERVE INJURY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PELVIS PAIN SYNDROME; PERONEUS NERVE PARALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRESSURE SENSATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINE FUSION; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; BUTTOCK; CALIFORNIA; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGERY; THORACIC VERTEBRA; TRANSPLANTATION; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; BUTTOCKS; CALIFORNIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILIUM; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORBIDITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE;

EID: 77953985647     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cabf69     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Ahlmann E, Patzakis M, Roidis N, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84A:716-720
2. Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, et al. Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;(329):300-309
3. Delawi D, Dhert WJ, Castelein RM, et al. The incidence of donor site pain after bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest may be overestimated: a study on spine fracture patients. Spine 2007;32:1865-1868
4. Dimar JR, Glassman SD, Burkus KJ, et al. Clinical outcomes and fusion success at 2 years of single-level instrumented posterolateral fusions with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2/compression resistant matrix versus iliac crest bone graft. Spine 2006;31:2534-2539
5. Fernyhough JC, Schimandle JJ, Weigel MC, et al. Chronic donor site pain complicating bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest for spinal fusion. Spine 1992;17:1474-1480
6. Heary RF, Schlenk RP, Sacchieri TA, et al. Persistent iliac crest donor site pain: independent outcome assessment. Neurosurgery 2002;50:510-6; discussion 516-517
7. Johnsson R, Strömqvist B, Aspenberg P. Randomized radiostereometric study comparing osteogenic protein-1 (BMP-7) and autograft bone in human noninstrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: 2002 volvo award in clinical studies. Spine 2002;27:2654-2661
8. Robertson PA, Wray AC. Natural history of posterior iliac crest bone graft donation for spinal surgery. Spine 2001;26:1473-1476
9. Skaggs DL, Samuelson MA, Hale JM, et al. Complications of posterior iliac crest bone grafting in spine surgery in children. Spine 2000;25:2400-2402