Don't just stare at me!

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 1241-1249

  Wang, Ning ^a   Gratch, Jonathan ^a  

^a University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

gaze; rapport; virtual agent

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; VIRTUAL AGENT; VIRTUAL WORLDS;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 77953984850     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753513     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (62)

1. Argyle, M. Bodily Communication (Second Edition). Routledge, Oxford, 1988.
2. Argyle, M. and Cook, M. Gaze and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976.
3. Bailenson, J.N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A.C., Lundblad, N., and Jin, M. The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: Digital transformations of teachers, students, and social context. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, (2008) 17, 102-141.
4. Beebe, S. A. Effects of eye contact, posture and vocal inflection upon credibility and comprehension. Australian SCAN: Jounal of Human Communication, (1980) 7-8, 57-70
5. th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, (Tokyo, 2008), Springer, 262-269.
6. Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L. and Johnson, T. Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication, (2002) 52, 566-580 (Pubitemid 37164239)
7. th Annual International Workshop on Presence, (Barcelona, 2007)
8. Beskow, J. Animation of talking agents., in Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Audio-Visual Speech Processing, (1997) 149-152.
9. Blizzard: http://www.wow.com
10. Burgoon, J. K., Coker, D. A., and Coker, R. A. Communicative effects of gaze behavior: A test of two contrasting explanations. Human Communication Research, 1986 (12), 495-524.
11. Burns, M., Rapport and relationships: The basis of child care. Journal of Child Care, 1984. 2, 47-57.
12. Cassell, J., Bickmore, T.W., Billinghurst, M., Campbell, L., Chang, K., Vilhjalmsson, H.H., and Yan, H. Embodiment in Conversational Interfaces: Rea. In Proceedings of Computer Human Interaction, 1999, 520-527.
13. Cassell, J. & Miller, P. Is it self-administration if the computer gives you encouraging looks? In Conrad, F.G. & Schober, M.F. Eds. Envisioning the Survey Interview of the Future, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2008, 161-178.
14. Cassell, J., Torres, O. and Prevost, S. Turn Taking vs. Discourse Structure: How Best to Model Multimodal Conversation. In Wilks, I., editor, Machine Conversations. Kluwer, The Hague, 1999.
15. Chartrand, T. L., and Bargh, J. A. The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (1999) 76, 893-910.
16. Cheek, J.M., The Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale (RCBS). Wellesley College, Wellesley MA, 1983.
17. Clark, H.H. and E.F. Schaefer, Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, (1989) 13, 259-294.
18. Cogger, J. W. Are you a skilled interviewer? Personnel Journal, (1982) 61, 840-843.
19. Colburn, R. A., Cohen, M. F., and Drucker, S. M. Avatar Mediated Conversational Interfaces. Technical Report MSR-TR-2000-81, Microsoft, 2000.
20. Drolet, A. L., and Morris, M. W. Rapport in conflict resolution: accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. Experimental Social Psychology, (2000) 36, 26-50.
21. Fry, R. and Smith, G. F. The effects of feedback and eye contact on performance of a digit-encoding task. Journal of Social Psychology, (1975) 96, 145-146.
22. Fuchs, D. Examiner familiarity effects on test performance: implications for training and practice. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, (1987) 7, 90-104.
23. Garau, M., Slater, M., Bee, S., and Sasse, M.A. The Impact of Eye Gaze on Communication Using Humanoid Avatars. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2001, 309-316.
24. Garcia, P. Move: Component groupware foundations for collaborative virtual environments, in 4th International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments, 2000, 55-62.
25. Goldberg, G. N., Kiesler, C. A., and Collins, B. E. Visual behavior and face-to-face distance during interaction. Sociometry, (1969) 32, 43-53.
26. th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, (Paris, 2007), Springer, 125-138.
27. Harrigan, J. A., Oxman, T. E., Rosenthal, R. Rapport expressed through nonverbal behavior. Journal of Non-verbal Behavior (1985) 9(2).
28. Heylen, D.K.J. and van Es, I. and Nijholt, A. and van Dijk, E.M.A.G. Controlling the Gaze of Conversational Agents, in Natural, Intelligent and Effective Interaction in Multimodal Dialogue Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2005, 245-262.
29. John, O.P. and S. Srivastava, The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, (1999), 2, 102-138.
30. th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, (Kos, 2005), Springer, 253-265.
31. th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (Estoril, 2008), 120-127.
32. th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, (Tokyo, 2008), 253-261.
33. Kendon, A. Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, (1967), 26, 22-63.
34. th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, (Marina del Rey, 2006), 28-41.
35. th European Conference Facial Expressions: Measurement and Meaning, (Durham, United Kingdom, 2005).
36. Lennox, R.D. and R.N. Wolfe, Revision of the Self-Monitoring Scale. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, (1984). 46: p. 1349-1364.
37. Lester, J.C., Stuart, S.G., Callaway, C.B., Voerman, J.L., and Fitzgeral, P.J. Deictic and emotive communication in animated pedagogical agents. In S. Prevost, J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, and E. Churcill, eds, Embodied Conversational Characters. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
38. Linden Lab: http://secondlife.com
39. Makena Technologies: http://www.there.com
40. McNeill, D. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992.
41. Morency, L.-P., Sidner, C., Lee, C., and Darrell, T. Contextual Recognition of Head Gestures. In 7th International Conference on Multimodal Interactions, (Toreno, 2005), 18-24.
42. Mutlu, B., Hodgins, J.K., and Forlizzi, J. A Storytelling Robot: Modeling and Evaluation of Human-like Gaze Behavior. In Proceedings of the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, (Genova, 2006), 518-523.
43. st Annual Meeting on Association For Computational Linguistics - Volume 1 (Sapporo, 2003). Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, 553-561.
44. Numedeon: http://www.whyville.net
45. O'Connor, B., and Gifford, R. A test among models of nonverbal intimacy reactions: Arousal-labeling, discrepancy-arousal, and social cognition. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, (1988), 12, 6-33.
46. Oppenheim, A. V., and Schafer, R. W. From Frequency to Quefrency: A History of the Cep-strum. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, (2004) 9, 95-106.
47. th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, (Kloster Irsee, 2003), Springer.
48. Rosenthal, R. Interpersonal expectancy effects: A 30-year perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, (1994) 3, 176-179
49. Scheier, M.F. and C.S. Carver, The Self-Consciousness Scale: A revised version for use with general populations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, (1985) 15, 687-699.
50. Short, J.A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1976.
51. Swaab, R. and Swaab, D. Sex differences in the effects of visual contact and eye contact in negotiations, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2009) 45 (1) 129-136.
52. Tatar, D. Social and personal consequences of a preoccupied listener. Department of Psychology. Stanford, CA, Stanford University: Unpublished doctoral dissertation (1997).
53. Thompson, L., & Nadler, J. Negotiating via information technology: Theory and application. Journal of Social Issues, (2002), 58, (1), 109-124. (Pubitemid 34268221)
54. Thórisson, K. R. and Cassell, J. Why Put an Agent in a Body: The Importance of Communicative Feedback in Human-Humanoid Dialogue. In Proceedings of Lifelike Computer Characters, (1996) 44-45.
55. Thórisson, K. R. Layered modular action control for communicative humanoids. In Computer Animation. IEEE Computer Society Press, Geneva, Switzerland, 1997.
56. Thórisson, K. R. Natural turn-taking needs no manual. In I. Karlsson, B. Granstr̈om, and D. House, eds, Multimodality in Language and speech systems,. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002, 173-207.
57. Tickle-Degnen, L., Rosenthal, R. The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates, Psychological Inquiry, (1990) 1, 285-93.
58. Tixeo Soft: http://www.workspace3d.com
59. Tsui, P., & Schultz, G. L. Failure of Rapport: Why psychotheraputic engagement fails in the treatment of Asian clients. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, (1985) 55, 561-569.
60. Vertegaal, R. The GAZE Groupware System: Mediating Joint Attention in Multiparty Communication and Collaboration, in Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (Pittsburgh, 1999), ACM, 294-301,
61. Ward, N., & Tsukahara, W. Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, (2000) 23, 1177-1207.
62. th regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1970.